Significance of Arab prayer/chant during film's close with Kinderman and
Dyer?
To show evil still existed in the world?
Some spirituality?
Dyer?
To show evil still existed in the world?
Some spirituality?
That prayer/chant opens the film and closes it for reasons mentioned in another thread.
It makes the film more powerful to recognize both these major religions, and by doing it this way the film actually catches the attention of that region of the world and engages their spirituality as well. The supernatural occurrences and the evil depicted feels so much realer for a number of reasons; the decision to include the Islam Holy prayer is one of them.
Also: Isn't William Peter Blatty himself an Arab raised by Catholic parents or something like that?
I'm not a control freak, I just like things my way
Also: Isn't William Peter Blatty himself an Arab raised by Catholic parents or something like that?
It doesn't surprise me, considering Christians' track record for extending the long arm of their God's law to every possible portion of the planet. I just wasn't sure if I had Blatty confused with M. Night Shyamalan or not. The latter is an Indian raised Catholic, I believe.
I'm not a control freak, I just like things my way
It's the Muslim call to prayer. It also appeared in the beginning titles, before merrin passed many worshippers praying in iraq.
shareThe opening scenes imply that the demon is of Middle Eastern origins, or at rather an entity worshipped by pre-Christian/pre-Islamic people in the Middle East. Merrin was made aware of its presence during his archeological dig at a Sumerian/Babylonian site in Iraq.
The closing Muslim call to prayer was just a reminder of its Middle Eastern origins as the story came full circle with Merrin's death and the exorcising of the demon.
When exactly is this closing call to prayer?
In TVYNS, Kinderman and Dyer have their dialogue, they cross the street, and we hear Tubular Bells. Then the credits roll.
What have I missed?
Really curious. Thanks.
[deleted]
In the audio commentary,Friedkin said something like "It's to show that the only solution is faith and God to fight evil".
shareThat quote doesn't explain the OP's question at all.
Additionally, it's funny how that quote probably wouldn't answer any questions at all. It's the vaguest thing ever, but I noticed that many artists (or filmmakers) are vague in explaining their work, almost as if they don't want to spoonfeed us the message or the many ideas presented through subtext in their films. At least I hope that's the reason. In commentaries directors rarely address head-on and with accurate detail the subtext in their films; I hope it's because they've consciously decided that they don't want to explain it all, and prefer us to decipher it for ourselves.
That quote in particular is painful to read in its vagueness and annoyingly generic quality.
What are you talking about ? Friedkin said that's why he used it twice so it answers the question.
share