MovieChat Forums > Don't Look Now Discussion > This film is flawless

This film is flawless


That's all

reply

[deleted]

way to live in a dream world, the movie was and is utter crap.

reply

Cokey, you are embarrassing yourself. Crap films aren't repeatedly voted among the greatest films of all-time. If you don't like it that's more a reflection of your own poor judgement than the film's quality.

reply

Should I even be answering an imbecile who watches films like "HTTYD"?

reply

Should I even be answering an imbecile who watches films like "HTTYD"?


Says the guy who's entire posting history consists of little more than calling out trolls. Congratulations, you actually made 1 complete post without spelling or grammar errors! Things must be looking up for you!

reply

The actual response should be, why should anyone respond to an obvious imbecile such as yourself?

reply

really rated among the best films of all time? where?

reply

Sight and Sound
http://explore.bfi.org.uk/sightandsoundpolls/2012/film/4ce2b6a91da80): The decennial Sight & Sound poll see it ranked at #127 on the 2012 critics list, and #91 on the directors list.

Horror polls
http://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-100-best-horror-films-the-full- list?pageNumber=5: A 2014 Time Out poll sees over 100 horror experts rank it at #12 in the horror genre.

British polls
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/455170.stm: A 1999 BFI poll of 1,000 industry professionals sees it ranked #8 among British films.
http://www.timeout.com/london/film/100-best-british-films-the-full-lis t A 2011 Time Out poll of 150 inustry professionals see it selected as the #1 British film.

Those are all pretty serious lists, that polled critics and people who work in the industry. Industry opinion repeatedly ranks it among the great films.




reply

You know, I ain't the one to fall back on fallacious arguments such as relying on the majority opinion, but in this case it should be pointed out that both DLN's IMDb rating as well as the accolades it keeps receiving, are pretty good proof that fans of this film ain't "living the dream world".



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

Flawless?

No, I'd say the pace was a little too slow at places. Some of the cues weren't fair (why were the police inspector and the bishop sooo creepy, for example? -- no reason was ever provided to justify why they were presented in ways that suggested they were sinister characters). The sex scene was too long and didn't really do much to advance the story. And the climax scene at the ending was a bit of a let down -- granted, I didn't see it coming, but after that huge build up, I was expecting something more.

reply

[deleted]

27,000 IMDb voters give it an average of 7.4 out of 10.
'Nuff said.

reply

[deleted]

Why can't you just accept the fact some people like "Don't look now" and some people don't ? Please respect other people's opinions, whether you like them or not.

reply

[deleted]

Cops and religious figures are inherently creepy, and director Nicolas Roeg wanted to convey this. What's the problem?

They weren't nearly creepy enough, if that's what he was going for.

That scene is legendary. It's romantic, erotic, beautiful and innovative in its construction. Only a prude would find something to dislike about it.

Experiments for experiments sake.

reply

[deleted]

Really? Not even the bright red fake blood?

reply

Well the bright fake blood was part of the aesthetic. It was purposefully chosen to be bright red so it would match the color of the macs, so they weren't exactly striving for authenticity. In other words you can disagree with it as a creative decision but ultimately it looked how it was supposed to so it wasn't really a flaw.

reply

I didn't know that. Is there like an interview that talks about it?

reply

I think Roeg discusses it on his commentary for the UK Optimum release.

reply

Haha, what the hell? Just stop. It was just the type and colour of blood they used in films back then. They didn't specifically select that blood for the aesthetic. Watch any other 70s horror (or been western) film, like Dawn of the Dead; they used the same crayola red fake blood paint.

It wasn't until around the 80s that they began using corn syrup and dye capsules / icing gel / food colouring for realistic blood look, flow, consistency. Before that, in silent horror films, they used chocolate syrup.

----------
Who are you carrying all those bricks for?

reply

It's really not.


"Why couldn't the monkey arrange this from INSIDE the garbage can?"

reply

Yeah, it really is! Aren't you due back on the "America's Next Top Model" board?




Everyone's opinions are equal. Except mine includes a Nielsen box.

reply

Who pissed in your Cheerios, buddy? What do you care what I think of this movie? I didn't say it was bad, I said it is not flawless.

I have to say that I made a pretty benign comment (not even approaching anything else I have seen on this board against this film) yet you're so bothered that you go to my history to see what else I comment on? That's pretty creepy, actually. More disturbing than this movie. :P


"Why couldn't the monkey arrange this from INSIDE the garbage can?"

reply

It only takes 1 click to find out a posting history of an IMDb user... If you think that constitutes some sort of "creepy" and "disturbing" behavior, well, you have some really paranoid tendencies. Or you just think too much of yourself.



"Shake it, but don't break it. Wrap it up...and I'll take it!"

reply

"An exercise in film grammar", that's how the editor describes Roeg's approach to the film. I have to agree; there's more of trying out techniques than settling down to tell a story. That's a flaw.

Julie Christie is painfully thin. I don't know if she was on a diet, or anorexic or what, but her bones are omnipresent. That's a flaw.

reply

Hmm. Okay, no, flawless is different ... .
But a really good one. I am tempted to give it 10/10 for the subcategory of 'buildup of suspense without blood, cries, more blood, realistic gun shots, torture'.
It works just on cinematography. It starts with the blood on the church window, and the red accompanies us throughout the movie. Be it the candle when the bishop lies awake, or many other scenes. That's what they don't do any more in movies of our time. You see it, it kind of shocks you, you know it is there for purpose, and yet, no violence. Violence is elsewhere.

I suggest to watch this movie more often, in order to get all the connections. Again, here is a rare movie that has a lot to show, and doesn't do it the straightforward realistic way of the current days.

As an example, even if considered overdone, of course I have an idea to whose funeral the three ladies drive that are visible for a split second. They are all clad in black, look seemingly sad and determined. No spoilers here, but a premonition of a great kind.

I am still pondering about the medium, though, and her place in the story. Since she isn't the only one with such powers, why is she there? Maybe only on the sideline ... .

This movie is recommended to everyone who wants to watch an 'old-fashioned' movie, that has what a movie needs, without the boring hundert percent clear-cut violent plot. Rather something that develops inside the member of the audience, half cognitively and half sub-consciously.

reply

This is my favorite film of all time, but it's not quite a "perfect" film. At least, not from a technical standpoint. There are several moments where the ADR doesn't match the actors' lip movements, and little things like that. I don't solely judge films based on their technical merits, though, and have no problem declaring it my favorite. Not many films are perfect from a purely technical standpoint, which is why I see no reason to pay attention to film critics. Everyone should judge every piece of art for himself, and tune out what anyone else has to say about it. At least initially so a personal opinion can be formed.

My IMDb lists: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur5570856/lists?ref_=nv_usr_lst_3

reply

That is stunning. It's not even Roeg's best film and it's Sutherland's worst performance. Julie Christie wasn't all that great either. What's #2 Bicycle thieves?...sigh Seriously though, you're entitled to your opinion, but I was hugely disappointed and I loved Roeg's "the man who fell to earth" which is also not loved by most, but it's nowhere near a favorite 25 film.

reply