MovieChat Forums > Badlands (1974) Discussion > Interesting movie that stays with you

Interesting movie that stays with you


I have to be in the mood for a Malick movie, and last night was a mood. This movie stuck with me after. It was... almost quiet. Calm. Devoid of passion. It made the acts of violence seem shocking, but even they weren't grotesque or gratuitous.

The desolation and bleakness of South Dakota seemed like a character itself. I felt like the sheer boredom of the area was drenched in the psyche of the characters. Everyone seemed as bland as their surroundings.

When Kit's buddy died in the house there were no final gasps, no begs for help, just fading away. When the murders occurred Holly seemed indifferent. When her father was killed she seemed barely shook up. When Kit finally gave up he seemed resigned to his fate with almost zero emotion. Holly's monologues were flat. When talking about Kit's fate and the murders she seemed oblivious of what she actually was a part of.

Everyone/Everything was so dull that even when these two went to such extreme lengths they were still, well, dull. Devoid of emotion. I couldn't help but feel how empty and meaningless it all was, which I suppose is the point. They wanted to live while they were together, but even together they were struggling to get out of the doldrums.

The more I digest this movie the more I like it.

reply

It’s great. For a debut director to trust that an audience will stick with the film despite it almost trying to alienate you is some bravura shit.

I think the key is that we empathise with their victims, who are brief windows of sanity in the vapid universe occupied by these two delusional sociopathic kids.

That haunting feel of that vapid universe is what stays with you long after the credits.

reply

Although there is always a subjective quality to films, I believe your interpretation puts into words rather nicely what the director was trying to convey. There is a pervading and lingering note of vacuity throughout the film, as the morally bankrupt protagonists mirror the barren landscape which they inhabit.

Perhaps the most interesting element is a scene where Kit and Holly are staying in the rich man's house. As they peruse the objects, each character withdrawing into themselves, a knock is heard on the door. When Kit opens, we see Terrence Malick carrying blueprints. The blueprints not only represent Malick's character as the architect, but Malick himself as the writer and director of the film. Just as the character he portrays would like to leave a message to the rich man, so too does Malick wish to leave a message to the audience. We subsequently see Kit, realizing the inherent risk of lingering in the mansion any longer, quickly discard the note and tell Holly to pack her bags, as they must move on. What this scene subtly intimates is that just as Kit neglects to read the architect's message, so too has the audience neglected to read Malick's.

A similar meta-narrative display is seen in The Shining, where during the maze scene, Jack, in following Danny's footsteps, gets lost. What this symbolizes is that the indexical quality of the footprints; that is, what the audience sees, is not to be taken at face value. The footprints—much like the symbols and images in the film—have led Jack astray, just like the audience.

reply