it's on TCM titled 'One is a Loneley Number'
and in IMDB it's titled "Two is a Happy Number".
Wonder whats up with the title discrepency?
and in IMDB it's titled "Two is a Happy Number".
Wonder whats up with the title discrepency?
I'm watching it now and really like it. I suppose it's not on dvd.... : (
shareThe movie is readily available as digital stream or download on Vudu, Google Play, and Youtube channel for Warner video on demand. Forget DVD and GO DIGITAL. The digital version of this movie is only $3 to rent and $10 to buy. If it were on DVD it would probably cost $20 like most of the Warner MOD DVDs and good luck finding a place that rents them.
shareThe Release Info page on IMDb says One Is a Lonely Number was the original title, then it was changed to Two Is a Happy Number in the U.S.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069044/releaseinfo?ref_=tt_dt_dt
Mag, Darling, you're being a bore.
I just finished watching this on TCM. Robert Osborne explained that MGM changed the title after initial poor box office returns because they felt that "One Is A Lonely Number" was possibly too depressing and kept moviegoers away. I don't remember if he said whether or not it did better with the happier()title.
I like the original title better. "Two... " is too forced/phony.
[deleted]
I first saw this on network TV back in the late-seventies playing as One Is a Lonely Number. I've never seen it billed as Two Is a Happy Number at any time since, just by its original title. I think that IMDb needs to change it back to its original title.
share