MovieChat Forums > The Godfather (1972) Discussion > Anyone else prefer Al Pacino in this mov...

Anyone else prefer Al Pacino in this movie?


He was better than Marlon Brando(who was great himself) imho

reply

Yeah, Brando was fantastic, but Pacino deserved the Oscar.

reply

I prefer Brando, but to be fair the two were great: Brando as the commanding but paternal crime boss, and Pacino as the innocent who slowly grows into his dad's world and role.

I think Pacino did much better in The Godfather 2, which was more his own role.


07/08/06... 786... the sentinel of Allah has arrived.

reply

[deleted]

Brando and Pacino were entirely different characters. Brando's Vito represented the "old guard" Sicilian immigrant Mafioso and Pacino's Michael was the more modern, American born (and Americanized) businessman (coldblooded)godfather. They are both good, albeit very different, and it seems wrong to compare them; that is, either one or the other. Michael is essentially Vito's legacy.

reply

Al Pacino was great in this. This movie is what made him a legend.

Metallica, Iron Maiden and My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fan.

reply

This is my favourite Al Pacino role, partly because it is so quiet and understated - totally different to his 'shouty Al' persona. When he does let loose at the end, when Kay asks him if he had Carlo killed, it's all the more shocking and effective, because he's kept a lid on those emotions so far. Even when he hits Sollozzo and McCluskey there are no histrionics....

reply

Yeah, the "pent up Pacino" is much better - though also less seen - than the "shouty Al." I think he was also better in Carlito's Way than in his more vociferous variant.

reply

Yes, good call. Great film, and I completely agree.

reply

What about Pacino in TGF2 & TGF3?

Also he has an understated quiet performance in both Bobby Deerfield and Insomnia.



Global Warming, it's a personal decision innit? - Nigel Tufnel

reply

So unfair pacino didnt get an oscar for this.

reply

I think part of it is because Pacino has the better character arc. His is far more developed and nuanced than Brando's.

Don Vito started the movie off with a powerful presence. But with Michael, we get to watch him develop into that powerful presence by the end.

Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead.

reply

Me. I personally think Pacino gave the strongest and most memorable performance than any actor in these 3 films. And as good as De Niro was in TGF2, I thought Cazale gave a more moving performance and should've been nominated.



Global Warming, it's a personal decision innit? - Nigel Tufnel

reply

That may say something about his impact.
However, this is MICHAEL'S STORY!

"It's the system, Lara. People will be different after the Revolution."

reply

I prefer Pacino here over Brando and preferred Pacino over De Niro in TGF 2 as well.

reply

Brando and De Niro> Pacino in all The Godfathers

Al’s impressive but from both a performance and character standpoint, I find the two Don Vito’s more mesmerizing, interesting, and far less exhausting to watch (not exhausting at all I should say). The way some question was what so compelling about De Niro as Vito (or even Brando), is the same way I feel about Al... at least in Part II.

Perhaps his storyline doesn’t interest me all that much, but while Pacino effectively carries the film, De Niro’s subtle yet more varied performance is the one that amazes me the most. And let’s not forget both Vito performances are significantly smaller compared to Al’s, but yet they leave a long-lasting impression. So the Vito performances all the way!

reply