MovieChat Forums > The Godfather (1972) Discussion > Other ways of dealing with McCluskey?

Other ways of dealing with McCluskey?


Did Michael have to kill him? Can't they use their political influence to get him fired from the police or something?

reply

Considering he was a direct eyewitness to Michael assassinating Solozzo, yes, Michael had to kill him. A few shell-shocked innocent bystanders is one thing, but McCluskey is both a NY Police Captain and a hired goon in the pocket of the Barzini family. Leaving him alive would mean a death sentence for Mike, either in the prison he is locked up in, or eventually in Sicily when more of Barzini's thugs come for him.

reply

michael-judd is right: Mccluskey HAD to be killed. The Corleones had to have him dead, to protect Vito, and the Barzinis had to have him dead, for failing to get Vito assassinated.

Once he was involved, there was no safe way out, for him.

- Lord, have mercy on a country boy

reply

Killing him was the 'masterstroke', with McCluskey, Sollozo thought he was untouchable, and McCluskey thought HE was untouchable, even the cruelest thug wouldn't dare to kill them, let alone a civilian who let himself being slapped in the face, Michael went against the odds and knew it was the right thing to do and it worked, because it was the only was it could work. There was no political influence to use, the Don was sick and it's to preventing from further murder attempts that the Turk and McCluskey had to be killed asap.

Darth Vader is scary and I  The Godfather

reply

You know, it really didn't occur to me until I read this post, but this was the way the Corleone Family should have dealt with McCluskey: rather than have Mike shoot both McClusky and the Turk, they should have used their contacts and influence in the press to publish information regarding McClusky's affiliation with Solluzo. Once the news about McClusky being mixed up with the rackets was reported, he would have had no other choice but to resign from the NYPD. This would have made the Turk "vulnerable," in contrast to how Hagan characterized him, and would have enabled Sonny to go with his original plan to have the Turk knocked off. Of course in the movie Michael's plan was to kill McClusky first, then have the newspapers release stories about his mob involvement. Maybe Sonny was right--Mike was taking the fractured jaw "very personal."

reply

Publishing any information while McCluskey was alive would have backfired on them sooner or later, if McCluskey resigned from NYPD, he'd have nothing to lose and might still work for the Turk as a bodyguard so why making a second enemy when you can have zero? And supposing the Turk loses his protection, how to kill him then? Without a serious protector, there's no way that the Turk would try to negotiate with the Corleones or meet any of them. The opportunity of killing the Turk came with McCluskey, he was the key.

Now, it's true Mike took it personally but I don't think it was because of the 'jaw', but simply because the cop was involved in the second murder attempt against HIS father, you bet that was personal to him.

Darth Vader is scary and I  The Godfather

reply

Absolutely correct. If they had McClusky fired from the NYPD, Barzini and Sollozzo would have known the Corleone's weren't interested in a truce and Sollozzo would have gone into hiding. The Corleone's would be left in a waiting game, ever watchful for the next attempt on Vito's life. As Michael himself said "we can't wait".

reply

They should've got someone else to do the killing and make a run for it-say disguised as a black.

reply

That will probably be the solution in the (probably horrible) remake....

But yes, McCluskey had to go right then

reply

But that would not be justice.

reply

Other ways of dealing with McCluskey?


No.

reply