MovieChat Forums > Frenzy (1972) Discussion > Favorite Shot: Rusk with the Wheelbarrow

Favorite Shot: Rusk with the Wheelbarrow


Hitchcock often tried to get people not to focus just on "the content" in his films; he asked folks to try to enjoy their style. His not-terribly-witty line was "Its as if a painter does a painting of an apple and you ask if the apple was sweet or sour."

His point is well taken though. So often "what happens" in a Hitchcock movie("Detective Arbogast walks up to a house" in Psycho) isn't nearly important as HOW it happens("A man in a business suit walks up the ancient stone steps to an American Gothic mansion lit against a night sky, its uppermost window brightly lit in the room of the killer he will unknowingly meet.") Its all texture and tone and meaning. And style.

---

The shot I love in "Frenzy" that is this way(and that, a moment later, ties INTO that Arbogast climbs the hill shot) is this one:

It comes right after a profile shot of Inspector Oxford at home at the dinner table saying:

"We have to catch the killer before his appetite is whetted again."

CUT TO:

London. The dead of night. A medium shot: the stone step, surrounded by black iron spikes, outside the entrance to the stairwell of the flat of Bob rusk. It is empty but for a millisecond, and then a Covent Garden worker appears, a cap on his head and an apron on his body, pushing a wheelbarrow with a large and lumpy potato sack on it. The worker's head appears framed between two of the black iron spikes fence posts.

And our minds race to figure everything out: That's not just ANY Covent Garden worker. It's BOB RUSK. And we already know he's a rapist-killer, "The Necktie Killer" stalking London(we saw him rape and strangle Brenda Blaney.)

And that's not JUST a potato sack. The last time we saw Bob Rusk, he was luring innocent barmaid Babs Milligan into his flat and her imminent murder was pracically guaranteed.

So in a sad little moment, we realize: inside that potato sack is the body of Barbara Milligan.

Hitchcock holds this shot just long enough for everything to "register" (Its not a worker with a potato sack; its Rusk with his latest victim) and to take in the sheer atmosphere of the moment. Hitchcock adds something crucial: SOUND. Namely, the brief "clickity-clack" of the wheelbarrow wheels coming out onto the stop, and of the wooden wheelbarrow creaking under the weight of that dead body.

It is all of a piece. We'd been prepared for this by all the early shots of Covent Garden workers pushing food in their caps and aprons; and in the plot point that a potato vendor had to ship some potatoes by truck north that night. A truly great shot(it became a publicity still for "Frenzy" that was first published in a June 1972 issue of Time Magazine.)

And it leads to ANOTHER great shot. As Rusk pushes off from the stoop and guides the wheelbarrow out onto the deserted street in front of him, Hitchcock cuts to a long, high angle on the whole area below, with Rusk pushing the wheelbarrow towards a distant row of trucks(with skull-like faces) under a night skyline of London, not a soul around, a killer at work with body disposal. (This shot of a small figure moving across a big landscape is much LIKE the shot of Arbogast climbing the hill to the Bates House in Psycho, which is much like the shot of Cary Grant climbing a hill to the Mount Rushmore house of James Mason in NBNW.)

---

And so: the very late-breaking Hitchcock film "Frenzy" brings at least some classic power to bear in this one simple, moody, meaningful and atmospheric shot.

reply

Great interpretation ecarle, thank you.

The disposal of bodies is, I think, not something that is often covered in murder/thriller movies. But what a problem it must create for the killer. Hitchcock does try to deal with this issue in Frenzy – one woman is disposed of in the river, Babs in a load of potatoes being taken back to the country to be ploughed under, no need to get rid of Brenda Blaney, and the last victim is to be put in a large trunk…And then what? Stored in left-luggage at a railway station? How very 1920s!

I think about Frenzy a lot, as clearly do you. To quote the title of Charlotte Chandler’s biography, “It’s only a movie” but I would dearly love to know who Hitchcock imagined (if he ever did) who the other victims were, what they did, how did they attract Rusk’s attention.

The girl in the river; who was she? In Foery’s book it is stated that the initial treatment was to have her floating up wearing one red fishnet stocking with the other used to strangle her still around her neck. Red fishnets in 1972 - does this suggest a prostitute?

I have always thought that the girl in bed was a prostitute because of the garish bangles she is wearing. That, and the (admittedly throwaway) line early in the film that American tourists expect London to be fog-shrouded and “littered with ripped whores.”

Frenzy is fiction of course and nobody’s imaginative property, so the victims can be whatever I want them to be!

Finally, I tried to establish for years who the actresses playing the first seen and last victims were; thanks to the Net I now know they are stunt-girl Roberta Gibbs in the river and Susan Travers in bed.

reply

The disposal of bodies is, I think, not something that is often covered in murder/thriller movies. But what a problem it must create for the killer.

---

Indeed. Hitchcock dealt with body disposal a few times. He made one entire movie on the subject: "The Trouble With Harry."

Prior to that, "Rope" opened with a murder and the victim being placed in a cedar chest -- upon which food is soon served for a small dinner party and we spend the whole movie knowning the body is there.

"Rear Window" had a killer solving his body disposal problems by cutting the body up -- pieces in the East River, the head in a flower garden and then a hatbox. All described, none shown. 1954.

And then "Psycho" had Hitchcock devoting an inordinate amount of screen time to the disposal of the body of shower victim Marion Crane...all the better to mourn her death and meet Norman Bates. (Hitch spends all of five seconds on the disposal of the body of detective Arbogast...a shot of Norman at the convenient swamp near the Bates Motel tells all.)

---

Hitchcock does try to deal with this issue in Frenzy – one woman is disposed of in the river, Babs in a load of potatoes being taken back to the country to be ploughed under, no need to get rid of Brenda Blaney, and the last victim is to be put in a large trunk…And then what? Stored in left-luggage at a railway station? How very 1920s!

---

Like some real-life serial killers, I see Bob Rusk as a bit of a showboater. His necktie motif is part of it, but he seems to want to be creative in never disposing of a body the same way twice -- this also helps avoid detection, I suppose, otherwise every potato truck in town would be staked out.

Brenda Blaney he just leaves in her office, but I expect she was a "special" victim..not the sort of woman Rusk could lure to his flat, and he wanted to kill HER to hurt(or frame) Richard Blaney.

---

I think about Frenzy a lot, as clearly do you.

---

Afraid so. In my case, very very carefully. My attraction to it stems from the fond fan memories of Alfred Hitchcock "returning to relevance" with a bunch of rave reviews in 1972, and my attendant excitement at his comeback. But over the years, I've actually paid attention to the movie and...the rave reviews were right, but it is a dark, sick film.

And its darkness and sickness are part of its greatness. Hitchocck relates these issues with great taste, some humor, and no lack of tragic sadness.

That said, my forays to the "Frenzy" board are intermittant. The movie attracts the wrong kind of people, sometimes.

Odd, though: Once upon a time, it was Psycho that was "the sickest Hitchcock film ever made." Today, THAT Hitchcock film is treated like a quaint PG period piece. I expect the sexual component of Frenzy has made it the sickest Hitchcock film ever made, and the close-up look at Bob Rusk during the main murder and when disposing of bodies.

---

--

To quote the title of Charlotte Chandler’s biography, “It’s only a movie” but I would dearly love to know who Hitchcock imagined (if he ever did) who the other victims were, what they did, how did they attract Rusk’s attention.

The girl in the river; who was she? In Foery’s book it is stated that the initial treatment was to have her floating up wearing one red fishnet stocking with the other used to strangle her still around her neck. Red fishnets in 1972 - does this suggest a prostitute?

I have always thought that the girl in bed was a prostitute because of the garish bangles she is wearing. That, and the (admittedly throwaway) line early in the film that American tourists expect London to be fog-shrouded and “littered with ripped whores.”

---

I would tend to agree that hookers were the targets. Again, in real life, hookers are the easiest, least missed, and most vulnerable targets for serial killers...especially killers who hate women and their very sexuality. And this goes way back: Jack the Ripper killed hookers(hence the line in the movie.)

"Frenzy" never gets into the issue, but I expect that Rusk decided one day to torment his "friend" Dick Blaney by killing women close TO Blaney. At a minimum, Blaney would be fingered for the killings...but these were "Blaney's women." Rusk got to share them sexually WITH Blaney, even if one was an "ex".

By the time we get to the dead woman in Rusk's bed, Brenda and Babs are dead, he's done framing Blaney, and probably indeed back to killing hookers.

---

Frenzy is fiction of course and nobody’s imaginative property, so the victims can be whatever I want them to be!

---

I suppose so. Recall that in "Psycho," the shrink reveals that Norman Bates(as Mother) killed two women before shower victim Marion Crane. In the shower as well? Were they guests? Psycho IV: The Beginning said "No" -- the first was a teenage slut who tired to seduce Young Norman in Mother's bedroom; the second an older floozie whom Norman tried to seduce in a car near the motel, with Mother overriding his lust.

But that was just one writer's idea(Joseph Stefano's! He wrote the screenplay for "Psycho" too!)

Me, I think the earlier two women WERE guests at the motel, and that in ten years, only three times did women alone STAY at the Bates Motel.

---

Finally, I tried to establish for years who the actresses playing the first seen and last victims were; thanks to the Net I now know they are stunt-girl Roberta Gibbs in the river and Susan Travers in bed.

---

Ah! Now we know. There is footage on YouTube of Hitchcock directing Susan Travers in the bed...she's alive and well(and topless) and Hitchcock asks how her mother is and then suddenly...he yells action, and she's "dead."

There is also footage on the "Frenzy" DVD documentary of ANOTHER woman who played "Babs in the potato sack" for the scenes of Rusk manhandling the body from the breasts down. A very pretty brunette, wearing the sack like a dress, with a hole cut out on top for her head to poke out. Her head is never shown in the potato truck sequence...just Anna Massey's on the highway at the end.

---

I have taken the liberty of "bumping" my old post "The Necktie Killer: How Many Victims" to show how the script lays out exactly how many women Rusk kills, if not exactly who all of them are.

Seven. All women. One more than the six victims(four women, two men) killed by Norman Bates.

reply

The woman in the potato sack is a Barbara Allen. Apparently a “potato bikini” was created for her in the truck scene to save her and Barry Foster’s blushes. This information comes from a Cinema Retro magazine, Volume 8: Issue 24, 2012. There is a 10 page article on the film in it.

reply

It's also worth noting the reason Hitch asks Susan Travers how her mother is, her mother is Linden Travers who starred in The Lady Vanishes for Hitch!
'Give her my best' he says, which is not part of Hitchcock's 'persona' just proof of what a gent he was!

reply