MovieChat Forums > Dr Jekyll & Sister Hyde Discussion > One of the better Hammer horror films

One of the better Hammer horror films


In my opinion, DR.JEKYLL and SISTER HYDE is one of the better, more innovative horror films to come out of Hammer Films. I know some critics panned the female Hyde concept but I considered a highly imaginative one. Who else would have thought of it?

SPOILERS*****SPOILERS*****SPOILERS

I liked all the characters and thought they were well-chosen. Ralph Bates did an excellent job as the obsessive compulsive good doctor, barely concealing an unbalanced personality that was already there before the funky, transgendering elixir of life appeared. How he had so much money to begin with the movie never explains.

Upstairs lives a middle-class prim and proper widow with her two grown, polite and very likeable children, Howard and Susan, but look as if they are in need of companionship with the opposite sex. Howard chances upon the lovely Mrs. Hyde (played by the stunningly beautiful Martine Beswick) who obligingly gives the none-too-handsome Howard a one-night stand that most men can only dream about. Howard never knew just what a extremely dangerous person he was laying with on the couch. And it was for the better that he never did learn the truth. Susan is a pretty 17 to 18 year-old who is obsessively infatuated with Dr. Jekyll almost to the point of stalking. Brother Howard and younger sister Susan are in dire need of sexual companionship but nonetheless continue to be sympathetic characters. Susan Broderick, a pretty young actress for five years, disappears off the acting radar after this movie and no one knows what became of her.

One critic on imdb didn't like the idea of blending Jekyll, Jack-the-Ripper, and Burke and Hare. But I thought it was brilliant. Burke and Hare were artistically depicted by two, scummy-looking characters. It made your skin crawl to think of them being close to you.

The star of the movie is the delightfully gorgeous Martine Beswick, at the height of her youthful beauty, who by a stroke of luck was the second choice for the part. As it turns out, she should have been the first choice to begin with. Look for Martine Beswick displaying an absolutely womanly curvaceous and athletic figure with the most shapely legs in, 'One Million Years B.C.'.

The concept of a beautiful woman who is darkly evil is seldomly exploited in horror drama films. It was expertly done in this Hammer classic. It's just too bad that Martine Beswick's acting career wasn't more successful. She had the potential. Martine Beswick is the perfect, evil Mrs. Hyde. She's tall, beautiful, strong, self-confident, and dangerous! And she loves wearing RED. Martine Beswick looked to be one of those beautiful Caucasian women with some background of either Spanish, Italian, or dark Irish in her. She was so perfect as Jekyll's female doppelganger. She had the same fair complexion, dark hair and eyes that made the gender transformation reasonable.

If you watch the movie closely you will notice several subtle touches and nuances, all fascinating. Howard bumps into Jekyll exiting a store. Howard asks Jekyll how is his sister, Mrs. Hyde. Jekyll inexplicably responds in a deadpan way, "Excellent. I am in excellent health". Howard is momentarily baffled and says that he is referring to the sister. Then Jekyll reaches out, almost touching Howard's cheek, and croons affectionately, "...Howard". Howard is perplexed and put off, like most guys would be in the same situation. Jekyll comes to his senses and realizes his alter ego has been influencing his own behavior and actions. Departing the scene quickly, without word, Howard notices the store Jekyll walked out is a women's dress and corset retailer, leaving him even more baffled.

reply

[deleted]

Hammer actually pulled it off, and I am impressed. I had heard about this film back in the 1970s, but I had never seen it until tonight. I was always curious to see it, but I didn't know if all the plot elements could be thrown together to make a good film. I found "Dr. Jekyll And Sister Hyde" to be interesting, and it had Hammer's usual high production values. The movie has a lot of atmosphere to it, and the makers did a great job recreating the era.

reply

It ws a good twist on the Jekyll & Hyde story and they pulled it off.

Its that man again!!

reply

It was sanguine good piece, rightoh!

How shall the stars on the cheeks of this mandrill find a number?

reply

I was fortunate enough to see it when it was absolutely brand new (at the old Santa Rosa Theatre, in Houston)! And I concur...it was fantastic!

reply

It's one of my favourites from Hammer as well. Beautifully shot, tons of atmosphere and acting that made what could've been a silly film into a film that's creepy and tense.

"Hey! Ladies! That was fun!"

reply

SPOILER.I was initially put off by the title thinking it a silly horror comedy,but this is probably the best Hammer I`ve seen so far with a superbly atmospheric setting in foggy,creepy,sleazy Victorian London.Martine Beswick is clearly enjoying herself and should have gone further in her career judging by this performance-gorgeous to boot and the more relaxed censorship of the 70`s means we can see a bit more!Excellent script,solid direction with tension cranked up as Sister Hyde stalks the young virgin near the end.I was half-expecting/hoping Jack The Ripper might suddenly appear and murder Sister Hyde rather than have her fall from the roof but the ending works well nonetheless.

reply

Glad you enjoyed it, but I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree here. This movie honestly had a really dumb script that tried to be clever by mixing Robert Louis Stevenson's story with Jack the Ripper and Burke and Hare, but wound up just creating a clusterfuck of a narrative that completely lost sight of the point of the original text. The Dr. Jekyll presented in this film, goes from good-natured scientist to psychopathic murderer in the span of a heartbeat, with none of the duality or conflict from the book intact. At first, I thought the film was hinting at something along the lines of repressed homosexuality as the duality this version of the character battles, but that doesn't to be the case as Jekyll seems genuinely interested in pursuing a romantic relationship with Susan towards the end.

So basically, the film removed the entire thematic crux of Robert Louis Stevenson's text just to do a gimmicky retelling of the classic story with elements of Jack the Ripper and Burke and Hare thrown in. And top of that, the film is also littered with plot contrivances and thinly sketched character motivations. Lame.

reply

Yeah, I've just been watching it again, for the first time in twenty or thirty years, and it is not good. The screenplay is a completely unfocused mess. Jekyll has no personality but what can be conveyed by Ralph Bates being, essentially, the same casually psychopathic character he played in The Horror of Frankenstein. We have endless cutaways to the people upstairs, a frequently appearing blind guy who will inevitably lead the police to Jekyll in the last few minutes... and... that woman singing the sad and sappy song (music and lyrics by Brian Clemens) in the pub...forever. They clearly had the one idea Ralph Bates turning into Martine Beswick and just spun a paper thin story round that.

Of course, this is Hammer, so it's got nice sets and competent actors and is generally a well made film. And it does have some nice sequences in the last third...

reply

Definitely. I thought it was great.

reply