A Question.....


I enjoyed this movie, but I have to wonder. If the cannibals could get out of the underground to obtain their "raw meat" as it were why were they still underground? OK I get that there was a cave in, but obviously, they could not have gone "generations" before discovering how to get out. I know I am overthinking the plot, but that really started to niggle at my mind yesterday after I finished watching it. It seemed that the caved in part was extremely well finished so it did not make any sense that they would not spend the money to find the survivors. Anyways, thats just my take on it. I'm sure some of you cinephiles will enlighten me.

reply

as the money goes--the story in the film says there WAS no more money.

As far as why they never got out other than for "hunting," I suspect that, much as language was lost, eventually the idea of any world outside their subterranean one was also lost, so they didn't think there was a reason to leave (whatever generations were around by the time they finished digging)

reply

This plot had so many holes it made it hard to suspend logic. Let's assume (which is a BIG assumption) that 12 people were abandon because of a lack of funds to save/find them. When one has language, one does not loose that language, even though successive generations are living underground. The language and mores of the original "survivors" would be intact.

An example of this, handled more realistically was presented in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome. Here children from past generations of isolated adults have language but the tales (tells from TV) are amusingly distorted. Distortions in stories and history occur but LANGUAGE is not lost.
In Raw Meat we have the survivor practically unable to speak at all - muttering only "mind the doors" for every occasion and need!

Additionally, once a survivor found others, along with hearing the outside noises, from hunting, one or more would have left to explore that outer world - as our human ancestors have done since the beginning of time.

I realize that one must suspend some logic for many movies but, when that "logic" goes to such extreme distortions, it becomes big plot holes in the story line. The underlying premise is too unbelievable.

I also agree with others that the pacing and odd juxtaposition of Pleasence's humor become a bit too much and make for an "out of balance" project.

Interesting for a few minutes but overall an illogical bore and waste of talent.

reply

I agree with you hugely. A gigantic padded out waste of film stock. I hope London has less ineffectual coppers today as this crowd was lazier than a 99 year old lawn bowling team. Donald turned in his usual horror movie performance except for some yelling and "The Man" who was mumbling something about possibly being "Norris" or once drove a "Morris" or lately knew "Dorris," what a dork. He definitely did not reach the heights of Daniel Day Lewis. The only thing memorable was the room where the moldering dead lay. They turned in some really smashing performances.

Let it be unsaid: insignificance is the locus of true increpation.

reply

Inbred cannibals who have lived underground for years probably experience the urge to hide. When they venture forth to find some raw meat, for example, the response they get from that raw meat probably does not inspire them to socialize with "above-grounders." Rather, it probably inspires them to hide.

Underground is a place to hide.

It's a terrific movie.

Matthew

reply