"Snoopy explained it to him"
It's weird how Snoopy can't explain anything in the specials / movies, because he can't talk. In the comics, he's not even a dog, he's an antropomorphized demon-people or something, I have no idea what the heck he's supposed to be.
In any case, why is Snoopy not shocked by it? I know dogs are carnivores, but he's always shocked even by some dog pun and dog sayings, but not ACTUALLY systematically industrially murdering all kinds of animals - people even eat bunnies, which Snoopy is a good friend of.
People even eat cats and dogs in Asia, but we're not supposed to know or talk about it, right? Because it's SO wrong to murder a dog and eat its bloody flesh, while it's SO right to do the same to a cow, pig, birds, bunnies, turkeys, frogs, camels, horses, you name it. Right?
Animal casually explaining the cruelty industry to another animal, and only that other animal being shocked about it, is weird and hypocritical in my opinion.
There's SO much hypocrisy going on with this topic anyway - vegetarians are seen as 'evil brainwashers', while those that psychopathically and cruelly murder and consume bloody flesh like demons, are seen as some kind of 'normal people' or even angelic.
However, this is pretty accurate in how people see all this; even I have been guilty of this a long time ago, when I didn't know better.
This information and especially the visuals of what goes on behind the scenes is kept hidden and a deep secret, because if people KNEW just how brutal it is, if people could SEE where their muscle pieces come from and how the animals are treated, many people would quit giving these animal-murderers money (just watch 'Meet Your Meat'). In fact, there WAS a campaign that showed the brutality of slaugherhouses and animals being murdered in little TV screens in grocery stores.
People's reaction? "It's SO wrong!".."..to SHOW us all this in the stores."
Yes, people were shocked and appalled that they are SHOWN this stuff!
reply
share
avortac4 (3457)
2 years ago
I mean, they weren't shocked about animals being TREATED badly, they were shocked and appalled by being TOLD and SHOWN about it.
They didn't want to know, they didn't want to see or hear the animal squeals and screams, they just wanted to buy the 'stuff' from the shelves and go home to consume it.
The Woodstock-scene perfectly depicts people's ATTITUDE and IGNORANCE about this crap; they, as even I did in the past, see the painfully and brutally murdered innocent animals' muscle pieces and strands as 'FOOD MATERIAL' on a store shelf.
They look at tomatoes, eggs, 'meat' the same way. It's all equally "food stuff I can buy", and as it sits neatly packaged on a shelf, there's NO NEED to think about it any further. It's just "food I can grab from a shelf and buy", just like cookies, pineapple, bread or ketchup. It's just "STUFF" in a store, there's NO THOUGHT beyond that, so people don't even think about it any more than Woodstock did.
In THAT sense, it's brilliantly accurate. But this whole thing is so horrifying, because it's so true what happens in the world.
If there was 'human meat' in the store, I would not be ANY more shocked about it than I am about 'cow muscles and bloody pig flesh' on the same shelf. It's equally unethical, except that the cows and pigs were probably treated WAY worse and had more miserable and painful 'life' (if you can call it that) in a damp, cold dungeon with bad, malnourishing 'food' and being treated unfairly and without any value.
I am sure if 'human meat camps' ever become a thing, they're STILL treated better than any 'meat animals' ever have.
reply
share
avortac4 (3457)
2 years ago
But sure, blame those EVIL VEGETARIANS for brainwashing Schultz (I write it with a T, because that's how I remember it) into showing that there might be a tiny problem with how people consume things without thinking. How DARE those evil vegetarians live a healthy, ethical and environmentally sound life! What horrible people to brainwash Schultz into showing people the truth!
reply
share