But don't be so hard on the Rona Barretts and Rex Reeds of the world because the film -- although well made, artistic, realistic and unique -- deals with very unsavory things, like a house of ill repute in the Old West and grim slayings. It's the furthest thing from a fun, upbeat, wholesome experience and so it's no wonder that some people don't like it or have mixed feelings about it. I personally value it, but I understand why others don't. For instance, I put it on for my wife & I to watch and she walked away in half an hour!
that's all true, but i feel no need to make a safe space for those who make a safe space for the banal professionally, and knock down the more adventurous, the less conventional.
PK's basic critique of criticism still holds true.
...keeping in mind that a conventional film can be greatly entertaining while an adventurous atypical one can be dull as dishwater, not to mention pretentious; it all comes down to filmmakers' resources, skill and execution. Since we're talking about Westerns, "North to Alaska" is a good example of the former while Altman's dreadful "Buffalo Bill and the Indians, or Sitting Bull's History Lesson" is a good example of the latter.