MovieChat Forums > Klute (1971) Discussion > boring and tedious

boring and tedious


not a thriller

reply

What category would you put it in, Hownos?

reply

drama

reply

Drama, yes, I suppose that fits better.

reply

maybe romance as well

reply

Yes, in fact, it could be squeezed into the category of Romance. I suppose, though, that back in the 70s, to call a film about prostitutes a "Romance" might have been a little controversial.

reply

Yeah, I agree it wasn't very good. I rated a 5/10.

reply

that is very low for you allaby.

reply

Yes, I really did not like the film.

reply

You mean you didn't like it; not that it wasn't very good, yes? :)

I quite liked it. The pacing was just right for the story, I thought. The music helped a lot, too. And the cinematography was excellent.

reply

I didn't like it because I think it wasn't very good. I wasn't impressed with the performances or the story and it was not a very interesting or well made film, in my opinion.

reply

Horses for courses, I suppose.

But I am surprised that you didn't think it was well-made.

reply

I class it as 'character study' and on that level it works beautifully.

As a thriller it's okay but not particularly memorable. I still rate it a 7/10 and consider it a seminal film for Fonda's brilliant performance.

reply

Speaking of her performance, there is a scene where her acting fails, but ever so slightly. She's walking across a city street, and you can see a slight smile, where there's no reason for her to smile. I thought that was perhaps because there was a crowd of onlookers watching the scene being filmed, and she couldn't help but smile a little bit.

reply

That's an interesting observation... I don't recall the scene specifically but I must admit I have been known to smile to myself for no reason that would be apparent to observers... perhaps she was remembering a funny story?

reply

It seemed to me that she was a bit self-conscious because of the onlookers, who would certainly have been gawking at her being filmed. An actor walking across a New York street with klieg lights and cameras pointing at her would be bound to feel a little embarrassed. Maybe someone in the crowd said something out loud, or there was some other extraneous noise that she knew would have to be edited out.

reply

I’m more than halfway through and wondering why it’s reputation is so good. The story is dullsvile, man. Nothing has happened but a lot of talking. Fonda is fine but the greatest? She was better in They Shoot Horses. And maybe it’s watching it on demand but the film is so darkly lit.

reply

Fonda broke through in They Shoot Horses... and there's no question that that is the much better film, and the one which revealed her to be a great actress rather than the lightweight 'sex kitten' of the sixties. But I disagree on her performance in Klute, which for me is a landmark in screen acting, one of the finest performances of the '70s and the greatest work of her career imo (Julia runs it very close, and that's also a much stronger movie). I think she's magnificent and makes the film seem better than it actually is. I agree that the story/script are no great shakes, but Fonda kept me enthralled.

reply

A majority of the films labeled “thriller” by IMDB are not even close to being a thriller.

reply

i agree.

reply

Yes I thought this movie was just a vehicle to display Jane Fonda's acting chops (which were fine), and to get her a Oscar.

reply

It had some very suspenseful scenes and the soundtrack was sublime

reply

Agree 100%. The movie revealed the killer just over half way through and all the “investigation” scenes were half-hearted after thoughts. This was anything but a thriller.

reply