MovieChat Forums > Diamonds Are Forever (1971) Discussion > Had George Lazenby stayed and done Diamo...

Had George Lazenby stayed and done Diamonds are Forever and Beyond


He would be easily developed in all 4 dimensions as a serious pen-pushing, woman-bedding and cocky Englishman for a patriotic deadly assassin, akin to how Ian Fleming developed 007 in his original Bondverse, similar to how Pierce Brosnan and Daniel Craig would play the role in the Bondverse films years later and a HUGE far outcry from Sean Connery's Bond and his films' surrounding Swinging 60s influence that is eschewed to showcase harsh reality of living in a counterculture world like The IPCRESS File.

Now, Diamonds are Forever. 1971 - USA was hitting the box office with the likes of Dirty Harry, the French Connection, Straw Dogs - R-rated grindhouse psychological crime thriller B-movies with troubled yet hardened protagonists fighting back against inhuman cruelty in any shape, form and no good deed goes unpunished.

Had the film been directed by Peter Hunt and starring George Lazenby as James Bond, the film as On Her Majesty's Secret Service Part 2 yet a novel accurate R-rated psychological crime thriller with a troubled hardened MI6 agent out for vengeance. That film would make America (and Lazenby's native Australia where grindhouse B-movies were also big thing) earn an absolute killing. Broccoli and Saltzman would be gobsmacked at first then realise "We don't need Connery or Goldfinger after all. We just need to pay attention to the goddamn books! Ian ought be proud of this, Harry!"

Diamonds would earn over $210 million in worldwide box office and have minor criticism for its darker and yet slightly camp tone but praise universally for its performances, music, plot and story development and faithfulness to the source material.

Unlike Roger Moore, who wouldn't have got the job and brightened the film with his charm and humour, George Lazenby's Bond would have made Live and Let Die a more down-and-dirty grindhouse exploitation action film in odds with the other action B-movies of the 70s.

Lazenby would've done The Man with the Golden Gun, in which would have been more suited for him than it did for Moore, but would still have it's criticisms and he would then intend to end it on a high note with The Spy Who Loved Me, a film that would easily tie-in with the continuity of the Connery films and OHMSS/DAF. But, if Lazenby accepted the option to do an additional film to further fill his contractual needs - salary-wise and offers from other decent acting doors in future - he would have gone with more of a mega-big-bang high note by starring in a more novel-accurate and serious film adaptation of Moonraker.

Jaws would still be in it as he was in Spy, but imagine Lazenby's Bond in England for the whole story with the same cast from prior films, Hugo Drax would still be played by Michael Lonsdale but no outer space influence or Star Wars inspiration and Lazenby would not have been a fan of Bond going into space and Gala Brand would be the main Bond girl instead of Dr. Goodhead.

George could then end it there with For Your Eyes Only bringing in a new actor as Bond with potential canditidates like Lewis Collins, Michael Billington, Ian Olgivy and Timothy Dalton

reply

I like the way you talk about a more serious Bond trend as though you come from an alternate dimension in which this actually occurred. Your pleasant fiction sounds great. However, Diamonds are Forever was so terrible that I don't see Lazenby's presence changing any of the utter shit in that film. DAF is a mess. Only the oil rig fight is salvageable.

LaLD and Moonraker are similarly blighted. I don't see those being better without a 80% rewrite.

reply

That's funny, I thought DAF was ok until they started blowing things up with space laser. The oil rig fight in the end was weak also.

LALD and especially Moonraker are one of Moore's best.

reply

Same feelings here. I thought the first half of Diamonds of Forever was fantastic, especially the elevator fight with the other assassin, and the chase sequence in downtown Las Vegas. Then it started getting goofier near the end.

reply

TSWLM, TMWtGG, and VtaK are the only Moore films I like. On the fence about FYEO. Some changes (like the music) could push it barely into the light of good.

reply

Yes!

This is a brilliant post, and I have to concur with AnubisRaydeen that it reads like all of this happened in some alternate universe where Lazenby put his ego aside and became the Bond we needed him to be.

It really bothers me now because after having seem him in On Her Majesty's Secret Service, I really wanted to see him in more films. He really was the quintessential Bond (him having to bide his time waiting for the safe to crack by reading the Playboy magazine and then stealing the fold out pinup from the magazine as he headed back to the elevator had me laughing something fierce; it's the sort of thing you would expect an average guy to do).

But your post does leave me wondering if Lazenby as Bond would have kept the darker tone that was introduced with his iteration of the character? I would have loved to have seen Live and Let die with Lazenby in the role and depicted as an inverted Blaxploitation film, and The Spy Who Loved Me as a more grounded espionage flick. I could definitely see The Man With The Golden Gun being a much better suited film for Lazenby, especially the fight sequence in the dojo, which would have better suited his martial arts background far more than Moore. Although, I still hold out reservations on Moonraker, unless it received a pretty big overhaul to be more... grounded.

Even still, your post infuses bittersweet sense of imagination because it gives a lot of "What if...?" scenarios that I wish had been able to play out as intended. But what we ended up with is still entertaining, just not necessarily as good as films as they could have been.

Oh well.

reply