MovieChat Forums > Wuthering Heights (1971) Discussion > This is an adaptation ... but only of ha...

This is an adaptation ... but only of half the book!


This is an adaptation ... but only of half of the chapters of Bronte's novel. I recently discovered this whilst studying the novel. I decided to rent out a version of the tale that I could watch on screen. I interestingly noted that the cut of this version said 83 on the video jacket, whereas in my movie guide it said 104 minutes! Where was this 21 minutes of footage lost? One of my friends remarked that it would be absurb for 21 minutes of footage to be taken out for the Australian cut. I watched the film, constantly wondering for how long would it run. It ran 83 minutes, all right. I was following the story with some study notes and realised that when it ended, the movie had reached only Chapter 17. Out of 34 chapters!

Was the movie purposedly made on only half the book?
Were the extra chapters lost in the 21 minutes?
Do all the WUTHERING HEIGHTS versions only chronicle half the novel?

Can somebody offer any answers?

reply

... we have a truly ancient form of the human being! We use the designation of sol- every time we attempt to mention such a peculiar life form.

He used to talk to himself regularly with no one else actually bothering to give him an answer.

No little boy, don't touch there! That's his leg. You can easily understand how underdeveloped this human being was simply by looking at it, so please stay away.

Anyway, this is how our visit ends. Hope you enjoyed learning some basic information about such an interesting being. Once again, please bother to collect some more info on this rare organism by following the next link: http://akas.imdb.com/user/ur1355003/boards/

Thank you and enjoy a very good day.

Cheers!

www.imdb.com/Name?Bottoms,+Timothy

Hooded for President

reply

Absurd or not, I just copied the American version on my TiVo and it runs 104 minutes.

I understand the 1939 version covers only 23 chapters of the book. I assume this one does as well. So what? It's an excellent movie.

reply

It's 104 minutes. The plot has been cut short on purpose. They changed some important aspects of the novel: at Heathcliff's return to the Heights, he finds Hindley's son is dead (in the novel Hareton outlives his father and Heathcliff himself and marries the younger Chatherine), in the film Heathcliff dies when shot at by Hindley (in the novel Hindley misses his target and Heathcliff of course makes him pay for trying to kill him afterwards when Hindley is drunk), etc

The adverts for the film stated that they wanted to highlight the novel's true spirit but at the same time they tried to make the book attractive to young audiences.

They did edit the film horribly. A few key scenes were left out, and the final scene, with a wounded Heathcliff dragging himself up to the Crags, lasted much longer. In an interview given a few months afterwards, Timothy Dalton says they cut out about 30 minutes of film:

"In one sense, 'Wuthering Heights' was put down by the critics quite justifiably. But I'd like to get the record straight on two points. Firstly, Anna Calder Marshall and I were damned for playing Catherine and Heathcliff as being too young. But Catherine died at the age of nineteen in the novel. The first part of the book covers them as teenagers. It's in the second part, after her death, that Heathcliff grows into this towering, awful man. We based the relationships on a physical toughness which is there in the language and landscape of the book. It's a savage, analytical book. Now just at this time 'Love Story' came out. The producers decided that this is were the money was - and they cut 30 minutes, key scenes of the film. All the "nicer" scenes were left in. We filmed an ending of total despair - Heathcliff collapsing on the moors haunted by Catherine's ghost. Three months later, the producers went off and filmed two extras running down a hill hand in hand as ghosts living happily ever after. But those producers could never understand that the greatest romance is the HARDEST romance - the one that goes through the trials and bad times, and ends up as some kind of torture. That's what the great poets have always talked about."

Taken from Timothy Dalton's authorized site: www.timothydalton.com/rwuther.html

"To live, for me, is to stand on a crater crust that may crack and spue fire any day"

reply

I don't think a version truly faithful to the book has ever been made, but in my opinion, the characterizations of Cathy and Heathcliff in this version were very authentic.

reply

I don't think this version was the worst of them, but it did have it's moments that just made me laugh out loud. Like when Heathcliff finds out Cathy is dead, he does this "AAAAAHHHHHHAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!??!!!" thing and then DOOSH smacks his head on a tree. And the bit where Heathcliff chases all these women with what looks like a red-hot poker...his James Bond exit, kisses the girl, leaps on the horse, gallops off into the distance. Fantastic. Don't know how Emily Bronte would feel about it though.

"A film is-or should be-more like music than like fiction..." Stanley Kubrick

reply