MovieChat Forums > Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970) Discussion > Was this America's worst military humili...

Was this America's worst military humiliation ever?


Does anything in the annals of US diplomatic/political/military history top P.H. for sheer incompetence and ineptitude?

reply

Sad attempt at trolling. First of all, you're asking for an opinion as if it could be fact. Next, you're asking for historical information on a movie fan site. Go do some research and make your own conclusions.

Derp.

reply

to the first part, I agree, He's just being a sad troll, and failing.

to the second part, not so much. Look around you, there are numerous real world historical discussions on this board concerning Pearl Harbor, and WW2 in the Pacific at large. It is NOT limited (except in your mind) to talking of FILM only.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

How's that Empire going? Oh yeah, the sun set on it ages ago.


MrsPrimitiveBoomstick's bit of stuff

reply

To answer the OP, I would say no. Caught with our pants down, yes. Soundly beaten, yes. But the commanders at Pearl had no reason to think an attack was that imminent. But realistically, it turned out to be the catalyst to victory down the road. The Doolittle raid was a bigger embarrassment to Japan than Pearl was to us. As to what I thought was a bigger embarrassment, I'd say Operation Eagle Claw was far bigger.

reply

Obviously a deliberate wind up question, but in an attempt at a serious answer: IMHO Pearl Harbor was not a humiliation for the US. Sure, there were various warnings of Japanese intent but the USA were not ready for WW2, in the same way that most of the allied combatants weren't, and it is possible to view the loss of The Philippines, the defeat at Kasserine Pass, and the first week of the second Ardennes offensive as more serious and humiliating setbacks than Pearl Harbor in terms of the loss of men, materiel and morale. All the allies suffered serious setbacks in their first years of participation. Most of the countries in western Europe actually lost their independence and were occupied, which was very much more humiliating and traumatic than anything suffered by the USA during the war. The British had to evacuate at Dunkirk and Narvik and Crete, while their defeat at Tobruk was a serious blow to morale. Their surrender of Singapore and Hong Kong against much smaller Japanese forces were serious humiliations on a scale much more serious than Pearl Harbor. Surrendering 100,000 men and a vital strategic element against a Japanese force of 20,000 or so remains the biggest British military disaster to this day, and yet it has been largely ignored as a subject for film makers.

Oh, and I'm British BTW. Just hate all this xenophobic points scoring between what seem to be equally ignorant Limeys and Yanks on this board.

reply

Oh, and I'm British BTW. Just hate all this xenophobic points scoring between what seem to be equally ignorant Limeys and Yanks on this board.


THANK YOU!

Between the Brit, "We were doing just fine without America"!

to the American, "We single handedly won WW2"!

I just wanna slap them both upside the head.




I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

For the record, Americans have never said we won WWII single handedly.

reply

For the record, there have been a great many of us on these very boards claiming just that. Just as ignorant as the Brits claiming they were doing just fine and would have won without us Yanks.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

"Americans have never said we won WWII single handedly"

Is this a joke? Many yanks say it a lot on the internet. "It wasn't until the good ol' US of A entered that the tide changed" which ignores the victories of other countries before the US entered, as well as ignoring that the US (like all countries) had it's share of defeats too after entering, like the Battle of Kasserine Pass, Hurtgen Forest and Rapido river.

reply

IMO, the worst humiliation of WWII for the US was probably the surface battle between US/Australian and Japanese cruisers at the beginning of the Guadalcanal campaign. Unlike Pearl Harbor, we did know we were at war, we knew the enemy would respond to the invasion eventually, so we should have been ready. Instead the Japanese wiped the floor with us in the most one sided surface engagment for the US Navy since the HMS Leopard dismantled the USS Chesapeake in the early 1800's.

reply

Or the various naval battles during the Japanese occupation of The Dutch East Indies -the Japanese literally wiped the floor with the US, Royal Dutch, British and Australian navies...heck almost nothing survived those damnable long lance torpedoes.

reply

Humiliation yes, but.... Most people today regard the attack on Pearl Harbor as a huge mistake on the part of the Japanese. True, it was a stinging blow for America on a momentary, localized basis, but from a big-picture perspective, the attack on Pearl Harbor proved to be a colossal strategic blunder for Japan.

Not only did the attack fail to sink any American carriers at Pearl Harbor (the intended target(s), btw), but the attack mobilized the American public - which up to then had been largely opposed to entering the ongoing global conflicts of early WWII - into a passionate, Japan-hating war-fighting juggernaut.

Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.

reply

It was not nearly as bad as the IJN's mopping of Prince of Wales & Repulse and Hermes....

reply

And it's not even in the same league as the Loss of Singapore....

reply

It might come near the fall of Tobruk....

reply