R-version on DVD


Anyone know what was cut for the R-version, that is coming to DVD in March?

reply

My guess is that absolutely nothing was changed. It's just that what was X in 1970 is now R in 2005. "Midnight Cowboy" was X. Now it's PG, and nothing has changed, except ourselves.

reply

[deleted]

Very true. Just look at 2005 TV vs 1970 TV. The Brady's in bed (and I don't think they were the first) was a giant leap.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

There is both an "R" rated and a "PG" rated version of MASH.

reply

OK--let's clear this up

"MASH" was R rated originally. Some blood and gore was cut to make it a PG--the one on DVD is uncut.
"Midnight Cowboy" was X rated. The rating was lowered to an R with no cuts when it was nominated for an Academy Award as Best Picture.
"Myra..." was X and (as far as I know) there are no cuts in the DVD. And, as some people have said--an X in 1970 is an R today. Not always though--"Beyond The Valley of the Dolls" has an NC-17. The MPAA requested a lesbian sex scene (which wasn't much) be cut to get an R rating. The studio refused so it has an NC-17 today

reply

I believe MYRA got her "R" from the earlier X when Fox tried to market the movie as a "midnight movie" in the late 70's ala ROCKY HORROR SHOW. They reapplied the film to the ratings board and it received an "R". Most people would agree that the ratings board gave out "X" ratings a little too freely in the early 1970's when it should have been limited to just pornography not mainstream films with adult themes.

reply

Now just to clear THIS up: X was a regular MPAA rating for mainstream films, just like R, PG, and G. It had nothing to do with pornography. Porn is not and never was rated by the MPAA. Movies that were judged to have "adult only" themes were given the X rating. It could have been for any number of reasons - sex, nudity, violence, taboo subjects - basically pushing the envelope like it had never been before. This is fairy common in movies today, but back then it was daring film making.

However, because the X-rating was not trademarked, anybody could apply it to their films, including pornographers who began to advertise their movies as "X-rated" in order to emphasize their adult nature. Because the X rating then became associated with pornography, studios were forced to make whatever cuts were necessary in order to avoid an X rating, or release it unrated. Either way, distributors knew that these films would not have been allowed in most theaters. Eventually the X rating was replaced with "NC-17" by the MPAA.

reply

The big difference between X and NC-17 is that the latter rating - introduced in 1990 to relieve the stigma of X - is a registered trademark and cannot be self-applied.

reply

[deleted]

"...the ratings board gave out "X" ratings a little too freely in the early 1970's when it should have been limited to just pornography not mainstream films with adult themes." That was the whole idea behind the "X". The plan was not to censor films, but to guide parents. The "X" indicated the film as a whole, or in part contained themes, which most parents would consider too adult for children. The MPAA was adamant that an "X" did not indicate a film was pornographic, though pornographers were free to slap an "X" on their product, as the "X" was the only rating symbol which was not trademarked.
The concept of an "X" was to allow filmmakers to pursue adult themes in mainstream pictures, without fear of local jurisdictions raising hell when minors went to see their movies, because now, minors were prohibited. It was only when sanctimonious politicians nosed in, hypocritical newspaper publishers and broadcasters refused ads for "X"-rated pictures and shopping malls prohibited "X"-rated movies to be shown in their theaters, that an "X" proved to be box office poison. Should a major star, in a major picture slapped with an NC-17 today, stick to his/her guns and demand the film be released as rated, and publicize the film per the norm, I would guess said movie would gross well, and remove the stigma of an NC-17. "Showgirls" almost pulled off the feat, but was just too over the top for a mainstream audience--and BTW, when I saw, "Showgirls", I encountered an irate father, angry because the management would not allow his 14-year old kid into the theater. Idiots like that guy, are one reason the "X" and NC-17 were devised.

reply

The word "mother" was bleeped in original X-rated version,too. Was supposedly "funny" (but it wasn't)--that they could say F word but not "mother." Haha! No difference between original X version and one that plays on TV all the time. Times change.

reply

an interesting footnote: I have the original 1-sheet movie poster from "Myra" with the year 1970 at the very bottom. It has an R-rated sticker which somebody half-pulled off, revealing the original 'X' underneath.

reply

[deleted]

Wow, you seem unnecessarily hostile there, alexfioren. And speaking of Alex... A Clockwork Orange was initially rated X. A few minuscule shots of violence and nudity were subsequently trimmed to get it an R rating. Funny thing happened though... when the movie got released on video in the '80s, they screwed up and used the original X-rated print, releasing it with an R rating. Nobody at the studio ever caught it. All subsequent home video releases have been of the X rated version, with an R rating slapped on the packaging.

But back to the subject of Myra Breckinridge, according to another thread, there's one brief scene from the original X-rated version that's not in the R-rated cut (I don't have either DVD yet -- which is the reason I'm on this board; planning to get one), so I dunno if it's on the special edition DVD or not:

"Just before the rape of Rusty there is a closeup of Myra brushing her lips across Rusty's butt and comparing what she sees to a rose bud about to open."

reply

[deleted]

If such a scene were filmed (doubtful), never made it to original 1970 theatrical release. This sounds like a description of something that appeared in the book.

reply

I have a hunch something must've been cut out. The DVD isn't mature enough for a Walt Disney cartoon. It's possible an oral fantasy scene between Rex Reed and Raquel was shortened, and I can't believe Farah Fawcett and Raquel would share the same bed together for a bear hug. Of course, the "ride em cowboy" scene where Raquel played doctor looks nasty but I don't have any idea what they did off camera. Also, the drama school where students were taught how to do nude scenes must've been clipped from the original release of the movie.

reply

[deleted]

the director discussed it during the commentary (its pretty good by the way, Raquel provides commentary on another track and dishes a bit, she wasn't sending mae west Christmas cards for sure)

reply

I saw the original version in a theater when it was released. There are two scenes I remember from long ago that were not in the DVD version I just saw. Neither of them were controversial. One scene was the Lincoln Continental in a scene where it was parked under a shade tree. It was like a car commercial. They have lots of scenes of that car, but not the beauty "hero" shot in the DVD. Also the scene where John Huston is waiting for Raquel Welch to enter. We hear the footsteps as she gets closer. In the original that scene went on for a long time and the worry built up in Huston's face as he went from confident to weak. It was just speeded up in the DVD version by cutting out maybe ten or more seconds. I would guess many things were chopped... pun intended.

reply