A great film


The Last Valley should be required viewing in every high school history class. History textbooks comment that the Bill of Rights, and the first amendment in particular, were in large part a response to the religious wars of the previous century. This film shows what that means in vivid detail. It certainly answers the question "What might our lives look like without the Bill Of Rights?"

reply

It's also interesting for students to see a vivid depiction of something that barely rates a mention in the average high school history text.
In addition, it's incredibly well written and acted.
And lastly, while Europe engulfed itself in a horrific religious/political struggle, settlers were busy carving out a new life in a New World, in an attempt to get away from the conditions that caused and sustained the conflict.

reply

The splendid Vladek Sheybal is in it too.

Marlon the Cat 1991-17th October 2005

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Well said, Bilwick. I purchased the DVD of "The Last Valley" and was impressed by the authenticity of the production. Like many conflicts, religion is but a convenient scapegoat. The real source of conflict is power and man's lust for it.

reply

The Bill of Rights is not perfect. It is simply a set of guidelines based on an underlying premise- the dignity and value of each and every citizen. That sounds simple, but a society that is oblivious to that concept produces horrors. Unlike most societies in history in which only the rich and influential had any chance for a decent life, at least we have identified the goal. An American complaining that the Bill of Rights is not perfect is like a shipwreck survivor complaining about the substandard decor of the lifeboat that is keeping him from the sharks. Of course, the Bill of Rights is not worth the paper it is printed on unless people believe in it and defend it.

reply

I haven't seen The Last Valley yet, but it sounds like I would really love this one. I'll be on the look-out for this film.

"Dry your eyes baby, it's out of character."

reply

Or the internal combustion engine or antibiotics or regular armies with regular pay.

reply

Yes, it was a great but largely unknown film. I saw it in the spring of 1970 while in the U.S. Navy at age 19. It made quite an impression on me and I realized for the first time why people fled from Europe to the new world.

It was sad to see the fatalist Captain die the way he did. One can pretty much guess what he would have said to Vogel as he expired: "If you find God, tell him we created..." Sure, one can fill in the blank without too much trouble: "We created this mess and we are paying for it", or "we created the disorder and awful situation. It's not His fault."

The music of the film is hauntingly beautiful and the scenery is so good that I found myself wishing that the photography had offered long glances at the mountains. There wasn't enough of that.

The topic post said: "This film shows what that means in vivid detail. It certainly answers the question 'What might our lives look like without the Bill Of Rights?'"

No, that isn't so. What the film revealed was what things are like for people without the knowledge of the true and living God, the God of scripture. Catholicism, state church protestantism, and atheism combined in the same population will result in superstition, confusion, and eventually war. The real gospel results in peace for any people who humbly believe it.

"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord." from the book of Psalms.


reply

If none of them had 'known' God, why, they'd have been as right as rain.

Pat a wet nun?

reply



I think the captain was going to say we created "Paradise" or something like it. Although it would be near-sinful to call the Valley/Village "Paradise" they truly accomplished something great there, and would probably have settled there forever if the Thirty Years' War hadn't raged on beyond the snowy mountain passes...

reply

I think the captain was going to say we created "Paradise" or something like it.

Although it would be near-sinful to call the Valley/Village "Paradise" they truly accomplished something great there, and would probably have settled there forever if the Thirty Years' War hadn't raged on beyond the snowy mountain passes...


Yes. Great analysis to a good conclusion of an overlooked film.

Passenger side, lighting the sky
Always the first star that I find
You're my satellite...

reply

Well said Martyrs55...I completely agree.

reply

What the film revealed was what things are like for people without the knowledge of the true and living God, the God of scripture. Catholicism, state church protestantism, and atheism combined in the same population will result in superstition, confusion, and eventually war. The real gospel results in peace for any people who humbly believe it.


That's an interesting interpretation, but what you're describing is the way it is in most areas of the globe in the modern era, like the USA & Canada.

The Captain was originally going to slay Vogel as soon as he met him, but after wintering in the valley he sets Vogel up as the leader while he leaves to go back to the business of war. He obviously had a change of heart concerning Vogel. Mortally wounded, he returns to the vale, his only sanctuary from the evils of battle and plague. His dying words to Vogel are: "Vogel, if you find God tell him we created..." This shows that he was no longer an atheist in the strictest sense; he now even hoped their was a Creator and wanted Vogel to find truth, love & happiness. But it was too late for him. Or maybe not?

One can pretty much guess what he would have said to Vogel as he expired: "If you find God, tell him we created..." Sure, one can fill in the blank without too much trouble: "We created this mess and we are paying for it", or "we created the disorder and awful situation. It's not His fault."


This fits my interpretation above.

Another possibility is what a couple other posters on this thread suggested, which also occurred to me when viewing: "Vogel, if you find God tell him we created... a paradise in this hidden vale."

I favor the first position though.

reply

I don't want to rain on everybodies parade, but as I'm sure you're all aware the colonization of the americas was not somekind of mystical peacefull fantasyland. From the getgo there were native casualties even worse than the 30 years war, and the fighting may not have been as intense due to lack of resources, but all of the european conflicts of the time managed to find their way over here.

"No man is just a number"

reply

And accurate history lesson along with the film would be also necessary because without it there would be more people like in this thread who doesn't know that the biggest religious bigots in Europe were the ones who escaped to America when the churches started to go softer and loose their power.

reply

the colonization of the americas was not somekind of mystical peacefull fantasyland. From the getgo there were native casualties even worse than the 30 years war


Except that AmerIndians aren't "native" to the Western Hemisphere; their progenitors arrived to the Americas via Beringia and thus they're the progeny of settlers from Asia. The Australoids, by contrast, are an example of genuine Natives.

Furthermore, your post supports the laughable myth that the Americas were a peaceful paradise before Euros & others arrived when nothing could be further from the truth. For instance, when Columbus' expedition landed on Guanahani (San Salvador) they readily noticed that some of the islanders had visible wounds to which they explained they were in conflict with the predominant tribe from a nearby island (in what is today the Bahamas). These neighbors tried to capture/enslave them.

So the Americas were anything but a peaceful paradise in the pre-Columbus era. Tribes were in constant warfare with each other. One tribe took from another if they had the numbers/unity/might. For instance, the Lakota took from other tribes to acquire "their" land in the Black Hills. What about the captives some tribes took and heinously tortured, like gouging out their eyes or genitals so they couldn't see or have sex in the hereafter? What about the human sacrifice committed thinking it nourished their "gods"? What about the headhunters, such as the Shuar?

Without the new colonists AmerIndians wouldn’t have had friggin’ horses (imagine the plains Indians without horses). New Americans wanted the land & resources while AmerIndians wanted their technology and other resources. Both sides used treaties to make peace while still trying to get what they wanted when war was too expensive.

Lefties love to cite the atrocity of the Sand Creek Massacre, but the worst massacre was actually committed during the Dakota War of 1862 where Santee Sioux went on the warpath and murdered between 600-800 Euro settlers -- settlers, not soldiers -- which constituted the largest death toll inflicted upon American civilians by an enemy force until 9/11.

reply

It's aged pretty well. The ending is a little abrupt. But what else could they had done, I guess?

reply

I agree, I found it very entertaining

reply