I realized that pre recovery I was Michael, he is a bitter alcoholic who has been on the wagon five weeks and the wheels fall off the wagon on Harolds birthday.
To me, Michael's biggest emotional problems are: 1) being ashamed of his sexual orientation, 2) feeling that he's plain and unattractive, 3) being ashamed of his lack of economic discipline. I'm not certain if all of those problems are ones that you identify with, or if it's only his alcoholism. But you say you have experienced a "recovery," which I'm glad to hear, whichever of Michael's problem you relate to the most, so that problem, or those multiple problems, don't bother you any more. That's great. Michael said near the end, "If we could only learn not to hate ourselves quite so very much." One has to learn to overcome those kinds of problems.
I thought Cliff Gorman was fabulous as Emory and I also loved Reuben Greene as Bernard.
At least one critic has praised Leonard Frey's performance as the best in the cast. As far as I'm concerned, they were all outstandingly great actors.
My impression was that Michael was clearly in love with Harold and that the histrionics were an attempt to attract attention.
Well, that's not my impression of who Michael is in love with. Michael and Harold are
very much alike (like Harold said), and I certainly see platonic affection, but I don't see any budding romance between them. Michael's foremost "love" is Donald. They have slept together, and the only reason they didn't end up as lovers is because "We got to know each other too fast." I take that to mean that they realized they both have the same problem of depression, and they couldn't effectively make a romantic relationship work because they likely would feed each other's depression, rather than help each other overcome it. But out of all of Michael's feelings toward his circle of gay friends, it's Donald is the one he comes the closest to being in love with. (It's even more obvious in the play than in the movie; I've never seen the play performed but I have a copy of the script for the play, and I've noticed some crucial lines of dialogue and physical action were omitted in being adapted to the big screen. The omitted bits would have made it clearer than Michael and Donald's feelings for one another are on the verge of being love, but it's the fact that they are both too depressed that gets in the way.)
I avoided the film for years because it has something of a bad reputation, but the dialogue and the performances sparkle. I got the impression that Harold was going to let Cowboy go home once he had helped him drop off his birthday presents, that Cowboy would escape untouched. Harold really seemed to be much more caring about the feelings of others, even when he hated the sweater that Hank had brought him he didn't show his displeasure, just a roll of the eyes to those who could see.
I wish I know who would try to give this movie any kind of bad reputation. Whoever bad-mouths it probably does so because it hits "too close to home," and exacerbates some of their own emotional problems. I'm glad you watched it and realized it is an outstanding story, with extremely well-written dialogue. Mart Crowley's a genius at crafting dialogue that is both realistic/believable and yet also gives off tons of insight into the character's emotions.
Again, because I've read the script for the play, I recognize which lines of dialogue were cut from the play, and a few too many of the cut lines were pretty juicy bits that would have helped movie-watchers get even more into the heads of the characters. And in terms of "production values," I have a couple of gripes about the editing. But still, Boys in the Band is among my favorite movies of all time. I'd rank it as the second-best gay-themed movie I've ever seen.
reply
share