'Valley of the dolls' vs. 'Beyond the valley...'
I'm sure somebody already did a thread like this. but I mean, who cares.
I saw the original Valley of the dolls movie a while back. and I wasn't sure how I felt about it at first, except it was a bit boring
then yesterday I saw 'Beyond the valley of the dolls' for the first time in my life & I loved it.
so I just had to watch it again. and then I saw the first 'Valley of the dolls' movie again.
anyway. I wanna know which one you prefer. and why
I obviously like Beyond the Valley better. but I don't hate Valley -to differentiate them I'll just use the word 'Valley' to refer to the first movie (the one based on Susann's novel) and 'Beyond' whenever I talk about the Russ Meyer flick.
Ok.
So, I like Beyond better cos. ok. where do I start
Valley is a potentially good film. it has a good story. the book was a best-seller or something. but it just didn't work w/ that script.
are you serious? it was just like a soap opera. only that worse. and then that conventional cinematography. flat like neely's tits.
oh, neely. she's the only good thing about the film, y'know.
of course you know.
but i mean, that's it. the only real good reason to watch Valley is Patty Duke. she like saved then movie from being the most forgettable thing in film history after that dude stuart townsend or whatevs.
Sparkle Neely, Sparkle! and all that jazz. but that is it.
and it wouldn't be nearly as bad IF the movie didn't beg to be taken seriously. what with that script and all.
and that is why Beyond is better. it's camp. and while Valley is dead serious in its drugs-are-bad-kids message -did anyone else think of educational videos (the kind shown in schools) while watching this?- Beyond's fun lies in its tongue-in-cheek essence. and ultimately bc of this it's more entertaining.
and all that thanks to R. Meyer. I mean