Hey Clint,
Dean's body of work may be small because of his death at 24 years of age, however, his body of work consisted of more than three films. A lot of folks think only of "Rebel Without A Cause," East Of Eden," and "Giant" as his only films; the first two released in 1955 and the last in 1956. Dean also has minor roles in at least four other films between 1951 and 1953.
More importantly, he had several stage roles and received good reviews for "The Jaguar" in 1952 and "The Immoralist" in 1954. Between 1951 and his first big film success with "Rebel" in 1955, he was probably in thirty or more television dramas some of which were notable and others of lesser quality. While about seven years younger than Paul Newman, Dean actually beat Newman to TV by a year, and he beat Newman to film by about three years.
Now please do not interpret my above comments to mean that I was/am a James Dean fan on some personal level. Like I said earlier, I think Dean, like Blake, were both flakey in so many ways in their personal lives. On the screen, however, both of these guys created some pretty good characters in my opinion. Paul Newman also created some great characters for me. On the flip side from Dean and Blake, however, Newman's personal life seems to have been a lot more closely aligned to most of the personal values I think the two of us share.
Newman's body of work is obviously massive compared to Dean's simply because of his longevity compared to Dean. I may like both Dean and Newman's works, but I am pretty sure I would much rather have had Newman for a neighbor than Dean.
Best wishes,
Dave Wile
reply
share