MovieChat Forums > Mosquito Squadron (1970) Discussion > We need more movies like this!

We need more movies like this!


Being a World War II aviation fan and war movie fan to boot, MOSQUITO SQUADRON gives both and delivers. The exploits of the Rolls Royce Merlin-engined British fighter bomber Mosquito and the extremely brave men who flew it are the stuff of legends. Why didn't the British produce more war films like this beside, "633 Squadron", is beyond me.

The British, twin-engined Mosquito started its existence as a high-altitude capable, high-speed, light bomber whose potential for a high-speed fighter bomber was immediately recognized. In its bombing role, the Mosquito relied on speed for defense, which proved effective...most of the time.

There was nothing else quite able to match the superlative, twin-engined, Mosquito. Yes, the Americans had their excellent twin-engined P-38 Lightning, which however was designed from the outset as a high-altitude interceptor, a role it fulfilled very well. The P-38 Lightning proved adaptable nonetheless, and as a fighter bomber it could well lay claim to equal status with the Mosquito. But that's neither here nor there. What matters is that the British were fortunate to be equipped with an utmost effective twin-engined fighter bomber that fulfilled other vital roles. The Germans tried to develop their own twin-engined fighter but largely failed. The twin-engined, purpose-designed, Heinkel Owl could be a contender but it was purpose built for night interception of the British night-flying bombers. The 'Uhu' (Owl) did shoot down a number of Mosquitoes but there would never be enough of them to seriously challenge the Mosquito. Only the advent of the German, twin jet-engined Me 262 'Swallow' and Me 262 'Stormbird' spelled the obsolescence of the prop-driven Mosquito.

World War II is full of the valorous and victorious exploits of the British bombers, fighters, and fighter bombers and there could literally be a hundred such movies produced. Yet in the past 65 years only a handful of such movies have been produced. I must ask the British, why?

reply

Our cinema is run by Americans that's why.
Look at 633, the star is a Yank but in the book he's British.
We have very little control over our films made which is why you always get the obligatory yank in them.
It's a shame.

reply

Bloody Yanks! (Guilty as charged!)

reply

The last thing we need is more movies like this. It's like watching an am dram production with lash ups of official RAF promo films from the late 40s. It just doesn't hold up against the better production values of more recent war films; it looks execrable even compared to its contemporaries like The Battle of Britain and 633 Squadron.

The plot is absurdly full of every cliche in the book. If this is the British film industry's testament to real Mosquito crews' celebrated precision bombing raids on Copenhagen and Amiens prisons, it's an embarrassment.

reply

Long story short...

What films get made is all about the financing, where it's coming from, what priorities they have, strings attached etc.

Up to about the 1950s, early 1960s, the UK box office (plus it's empire) was enough to support a proper film industry which could regularly make films which could make a profit without necessarily attracting a US or rest of the world audience. At least up to a certain budget level. This meant that many films were made with little or no obvious US appeal. (Even so, US fading stars were common in even the cheapest UK films.)

US major companies had long been investing in British films and had often owned UK physical studios all through this period but as the purely UK industry declined this became even more vital. Fortunately for the UK, Britain became "cool" in the 1960s after Hammer, Bond and The Beatles so US Majors invested in larger bugeted films set and made in Britain throughout the 1960s.

By the end of the decade though this was tailing off and Mosquito Squadron came at the end of this period as one of several MGM-British knock-offs of it's own slightly higher budget 633 Squadron. (Although their other similar projects had US stars like Cliff Robertson and Lloyd Bridges, David McCallum was, in effect, a US star after The Man From Uncle)
MGM British studios itself closed in 1969 and although they then shared MGM-EMI Studios across the road, their and other US investment in the UK was much reduced for decades.

Any UK film now comes from a house of cards financing package. The only films of any size which don't have a US input tend to be at least partly funded by TV or quasi-government money and they aren't interested in funding anything remotely like a modern equivalent of Mosquito Squadron.
The US money would be more interested in finding a US equivalent, so there's the problem.

reply

The film is cheap rubbish but I enjoyed it."Hellboats","Attack on the Iron Coast","Submarine X-1" and others all in a similar vein.You`ve also got the cheap Italian knock offs:"Eagles Over London","Churchill`s Leopards" etc made when they got tired of making cheap westerns.US equivalent: maybe if George Lucas gets bored sitting on his billions he might inflict Red Tails the next chapter on us or Mustang Squadron.

reply

I saw a bit yesterday - I rather enjoyed Charles Grey chewing the scenery as Dinsdale Landen flaunted his moustache and thought about mutating into Rik Mayall forty years hence....

Marlon, Claudia and Dimby the cats 1989-2005, 2007 and 2010.

reply

God, jeff, were you on drugs? Or have you got irreversible cataracts and earwax?

reply

Just don't understand why McCallum had to have the "Canada" patch on his shoulder. He's clearly perfect to play a British character, since he was wildly popular in America as someone who DIDN'T play a North American character...so why not just let him play a Brit? That's basically how Americans saw him anyway.

It's a mystery.

reply

Uhm, he's Scottish. Scots as a rule, prefer not to be referred to as British. Nor do the Welsh, the Northern Irish, and as a general, genetic rule of thumb, do the Cornish.

Just FYI.

Oops!!! Sorry. Easier to edit than delete. Believe me I tried! Several times.I am guilty of knee jerk posting...

I realize now that you were not referring to him AS a Brit, but referring to to him as well suited to PLAYING a Brit.

reply

Whoever he was supposed to be playing he looked totally uncomfortable.

reply