bruce lee




This film is worth it for the scene when Bruce does some damage in the office alone!!!

------------------------
Hi, hi, hi, Mr. Deltoid!

reply

I knew Lee was in this movie before seeing it. But this perhaps the only movie where a SINGLE person gets the better of him--or at least his character--in a physical confrontation.
*SPOILER*
He tried to take out Jim Garner and ended up doing himself in as he took a flying leap off the side of a building. All Garner had to do was duck!

reply

"I knew Lee was in this movie before seeing it. But this perhaps the only movie where a SINGLE person gets the better of him--or at least his character--in a physical confrontation.
*SPOILER*
He tried to take out Jim Garner and ended up doing himself in as he took a flying leap off the side of a building. All Garner had to do was duck!"


The best bit about that scene was the line Garner said to Lee to provoke him: "You're light on your feet- or are you just a bit gay?"

reply

"The best bit about that scene was the line Garner said to Lee to provoke him: "You're light on your feet- or are you just a bit gay?"

I used to think he said gay when I first saw the movie but over time I've come to realise that he actually say "giddy" and the actual line is "you're a little light on your feet Winslow, are you just a little giddy huh?" and for those who don't know the meaning of the word giddy ..

Main Entry: gid·dy
Pronunciation: 'gi-dE
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): gid·di·er; -est
Etymology: Middle English gidy mad, foolish, from Old English gydig possessed, mad; akin to Old English god god

1 a : DIZZY <giddy from the unaccustomed exercise> b : causing dizziness <a giddy height> c : whirling rapidly

2 a : lightheartedly silly : FRIVOLOUS b : joyfully elated : EUPHORIC

reply

I just watched the movie and James Garner definitely does NOT say "giddy". He very clearly says "gay". Besides, why would Bruce Lee's character get mad enough to accidentally kill himself if Garner/Marlowe had only said "giddy"? Despite the somewhat sympathetic (a relative term here) portrayal of Marlowe's attitude toward his officemate - the obviously gay hairdresser - his line to Bruce Lee/Winston Wong is just another example of Hollywood's then-current homophobia (as is so well documented in "The Celluloid Closet"). However, I would hasten to point out that Marlowe's use of the word "gay" in the inflammatory context of the face-off with Bruce Lee/Winston Wong does not necessarily indicate that Marlowe is homophobic but, rather, that he knows that most straight men of the era were and would be vulrenable to such provocation. Pretty canny, if politically incorrect.

reply

"Gay" wasn't a major slur, if one at all, for homosexuals back then, genius. It meant essentially the same thing as "giddy" or that you're happy like you're walking on air. Go talk to an old person and get some perspective.

reply

Wiki:

"The sixties marked the transition in the predominant meaning of the word gay from that of "carefree" to the current "homosexual". By 1963, a new sense of the word gay was known well enough to be used by Albert Ellis in his book The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Man-Hunting. Similarly, Hubert Selby, Jr. in his 1964 novel Last Exit to Brooklyn, could write " [he} took pride in being a homosexual by feeling intellectually and esthetically superior to those (especially women) who werent gay...""



reply

ah, no doubt, Bruce was good....but can you say...."acting"....many could have taken him "out"....It's called image and marketing.

reply

Read some biographies. He was confronted many times by many fighters,
and always easily won. He was a streetfighter first, an actor second.

reply

Sadly, Lee was one of the best actors in the film, next to Gardner, but it is a simple crime story, and Lee is just playing a simple henchman. He comes off as one of the greatest characters in the movie, in spite of being a henchman that bites it very quickly. Bruce is only in the movie for less than FIVE MINUTES, and it just becomes a wierd detective story again.

Not a bad movie, but after Lee's exit, I just can't get into it. I am shocked that Lee couldn't get more TV work as a henchmen, but I guess he hated that as much as other stereotypes. Today, when Winslow Wong walked into Marlowe's office, he might have even been the big cheese. I'd buy the VHS just for Lee's five minutes of fame, but just expect a cool actor (Jim Garner) playing a slightly different version of Jim Rockford, and then it actually works.

reply

[deleted]

For Bruce Lee fans, the office scene mentioned can be found on the Enter The Dragon Special Edition 25th Anniversary DVD in the interview with Bruce on the reverse side.

reply

I like the whole movie...especially at the end when Rita Moreno does her strip act. Strippers in those days had a whole routine and some class. Rita is a great dancer and adds some nneded pizazz to the last reel. But I love the whole movie, James Garner certainly had lots of charisma.

reply

I dunno, it´s just silly and stupid and terribly out of place. There´re quite a few such things in this movie, in fact.



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

I was shocked to turn on TCM the other night and discover Bruce Lee playing a villain. I thought I'd seen all of his films and I certainly wasn't aware that he'd ever played a villain.

I think I knew what was going to happen to him from the start though, when he first appeared in the office. James Garner couldn't out fight him, Bruce Lee wouldn't have agreed to that anyway, and shooting him would have been anticlimactic. I knew they'd find a location with a high elevation and that Bruce Lee was going to defeat himself. Sure enough, he did exactly what I thought he would.

The scene itself was still very intense though, very suspenseful. You could just feel the kicks flying inches away from Marlowe's face. Bruce Lee's two scenes were easily the best parts of the film.

And Marlowe's reaction when he went back inside was priceless.

reply

To be honest I haven't seen much Bruce Lee movies and I only knew it was him after checking the IMDB page for this movie, but the fact that it's him does make the whole scene a lot funnier.

reply

The scene itself was still very intense though, very suspenseful. You could just feel the kicks flying inches away from Marlowe's face. Bruce Lee's two scenes were easily the best parts of the film.

--
Pretty much so. They made Marlowe famous on "The CBS Friday Night Movie" shown nationwide on TV; moreso that its original failed theatrical release.

I'd say the other famous scene -- usually cut way down on TV -- was Rita Moreno's quite erotic strip tease while Marlowe questions her from the side of the stage.

Marlowe had a "TV series" look and some of that "late 60's" agedness, but it kept the hard edge of the source material. Garner was fine. Lee was memorable. The women were beautiful(as required) and available(and Marlowe turned most of them down). And there's Archie Bunker playing the "cop sidekick." And even rough-faced redhead Kenneth Tobey(he of the original Thing and other 50's Sci Fi) as Bunker's side man.

---

And Marlowe's reaction when he went back inside was priceless.

--

Ha. Yes...demonstrating a high dive with two cupped hands to Lee's mobster employer!


PS. I wouldn't doubt that Quentin Tarantino showed the Bruce Lee scenes in this movie to the actor playing Bruce Lee in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. The arrogance of Lee's character in Marlowe transfers to the "real" arrogant Lee in OTATIH.

reply

[deleted]