This movie has aged rather well

I first saw this in the Seventies and was very disappointed. They had taken, I felt at the time, too many liberties with Chandler and the 60's fit wasn't a good one. Having revisited the film, I think it looks quite a bit better now. It is still imperfect...the sets are a bit obvious, there really isn't much variation in shots, the intrusion and quick elimination of Bruce Lee (who obviously did much better work in other films) is a time-waster, and there isn't the "sense of place" Chandler (or MacDoanald) could give. But the look of the film isn't bad otherwise, Garner makes an engaging Marlowe, the sisters are played well, and Rita Moreno is sensational. As far as taking liberties with Chandler, well, it's "The Little Sister", for crying out loud, not "The Big Sleep" or "The Long Goodbye." (And I am still angry about what Altman, who I love, did with the latter novel.) The movie sits a bit better with me now.