MovieChat Forums > Easy Rider (1969) Discussion > The film's message (it might not be what...

The film's message (it might not be what you think)


What makes "Easy Rider" great is that it's more than just a road adventure with a modern Western garnish (i.e. cowboys on motorized "horses"). The film has depth that separates it from the typical biker flicks of that era. It's really about quest for freedom or the lack thereof. Wyatt and Billy certainly have some grasp of freedom – and they desperately pursue it – but they're ironically so shackled by their OWN carnal desires and growing addictions that the most they attain is a piece of it.

Wyatt laments near the end: "We blew it; we really blew it" as he realizes freedom has slipped through their fingers like water. Nicholson's character, George, has more of handle on what's going on, but he obviously has his own issues.

The hippies at the commune seem to have escaped society's shackles but to what end? There's a reason communes never really caught on in America, and the film shows why.

In an interview with Rolling Stone in the early 70s Fonda pointed out that Wyatt represented everybody who feels that freedom can be bought, that you can find freedom through other things, like riding motorcycles across the country or smoking pot. He confessed that "Easy Rider" is actually about the LACK of freedom in America and, by extension, modern Western Civilization. Wyatt and Billy are not right, they're wrong.

The only thing the writers (Fonda & Hopper) could do in the end was kill the characters. In a sense, committing self-destruction, which Fonda claimed America was doing. He said viewers often respond to the end by lamenting, "Look at those terrible rednecks, they killed those two free souls, blah, blah, blah." But "Easy Rider," he pointed out, is a Southern term for a whore's man, not a pimp, but the dude who lives with her. He's got the easy ride. And that's what he claims happened to America – liberty's become a whore, and we're all taking the easy ride.

So what's the answer? The answer's there and it's pretty clear, but I'm not going to hand-feed it to anyone. Seek (or, rather, watch) and you will find.

reply

I think you hit the main points well. Those who are looking for freedom, and we all are, become dangerous when they see people actually free. It shows that we are conditioned to follow society's written and unwritten rules some of which are outlined in the film. The symbols of a free individual and society may have changed since the 60s and 70s, but the idea behind it is still true today.

One of the big questions one has to ask themselves is if big money (a big score in the movie) isn't the ultimate goal, then what is? Money certainly gives one some freedom, but it isn't the only thing. It does buy pleasure, but does not buy love, happiness, joy or honor. Those come in other ways.

I wasn't sure if the ending represented a killing. Billy may have been an accident. No question, the redneck should not have pointed a shotgun at Billy so he's at fault. Afterward, it turned into a murder.

While I do enjoy riding a big motorcycle across the country, it may or may not be freedom. Certainly, it makes one feel in control and experience what freedom feels like. However, we know there are laws to be followed and we can't just do what we want to do unless there is no one around. We also are bound by society's unwritten rules. Thus, with freedom comes responsibility. It isn't that one can do whatever they want even if they have the bread, man. While it is an exhilarating feeling, the freedom does not last. What true freedom means to me is one is willing to give up what is precious to them for what is right. To be able to know what is right and stand up for it.

reply

Money certainly gives one some freedom, but it isn't the only thing. It does buy pleasure, but does not buy love, happiness, joy or honor.


It also doesn't provide pure purpose, noble motivation or ultimate reality.

Anyway, thanks for the well-said feedback. A saying comes to mind:

“Everything is permissible for me”—but not everything is beneficial or constructive. “Everything is permissible for me”—but I will not be mastered by anything.

I aspire to live by this principle: I'm free to do whatever I want, but I understandably reject anything that's not beneficial or constructive -- physically, mentally or spiritually. I'm free to do what I want, but I refuse to be mastered by anything because once you're mastered by something you're no longer free.

I haven't seen the movie for years, but the answer is there; and it's pretty clear (at least to me it was), yet understated, the way Peter wanted it. I'm not going to say any more because it's better if the person discovers for himself/herself.

reply

☮️🕊️✌️Far out, man! That’s deep! ☮️🕊️✌️

reply

Thanks for the feedback, Louis.

reply

Maybe it’s my age...but this movie has always been in the back of my mind and more so as I near retirement.

It’s the only dream I have left...

...a long last ride.

reply

It's a great movie with depth that separates it from the pack of biker flicks from that period.

reply

Well, it certainly stands head and shoulders and a skyscraper above the vomitable “C.C. and Company”.

To this day I still think Joe Namath is a RETARD.

reply

I have that movie on DVD and agree with you. But William Smith is entertaining and the curvy blonde is notable.

reply

"Money certainly gives one some freedom, but it isn't the only thing. It does buy pleasure, but does not buy love, happiness, joy or honor."

Well money does buy motorcycles, and gas. Which in turn, provides the illusion of freedom, a freedom which will end when they run out of gas money.

Tell me, does the movie ever mention where how these guys paid for their motorcycles and enough gas to cross the country?

reply

Well money does buy motorcycles, and gas. Which in turn, provides the illusion of freedom, a freedom which will end when they run out of gas money.


That might be one of the reasons Wyatt laments near the end: "We blew it; we really blew it" as he realizes freedom has slipped through their fingers like water.

I can't remember offhand how they acquired enough money for their motorcycles & long trip. I'm assuming it's implied in the movie, but I haven't seen it for at least five years. I'll give it a re-watch soon.

reply

I always had the impression that they were dealers.

reply

The classic Odyssey.

Always a duo.

Like Tom and Huck trekkin’ down the mighty Mississippi.


♞🖤👹🖤♞

reply

I always had the impression that they were dealers.


That's what I was thinking, but my memory's foggy.

reply

Dugee will do that to a person.

I vaguely recall.

reply

I wouldnt be surprised, but I honestly dont remember.

But yeah, they never had anything but the illusion of freedom. I suspect that the people who hated them werent actually jealous of their supposed freedom, but either pitying or resentful of freeloaders.

reply

They sold a suitcase full of dope to Phil Spector and had the gas tanks of their bikes filled with rubber hoses stuffed with money. A closeup of the hose being fed into Wyatt's stars & stripes gas tank is a visual metaphor for f--king America with money.

reply