MovieChat Forums > The Split (1968) Discussion > This is a great movie!

This is a great movie!


They show it once in a while on tv so be on the lookout for it. It is one of Jim Brown's best but the rest of the cast is excellent too.

reply

i havent seen it i would love to see it

reply



Just saw it on TCM

Quite good indeed.

Excellent cast.

reply

One of my favorite casts of character actors ever, including Jack Klugman, Ernest Borgnine, Gene Hackman before he became a star, Warren Oates, Donald Sutherland and James Whitemore.

reply

I didn't find the film to be anything great, but it does boast one terrific line:

Donald Suthernland to Warren Oates: "Calm down, guy. The last man I killed was for $5,000. For $85,000, I'll kill you seventeen times."

Steve V.

reply

A great cast to be sure - and from my favorite era in film - but the last 30 minutes are an indulgent, aimless mess. Should have been so much better.

reply

I also liked it. I like heist movies in general and this sounded like a remake of Kubrick's The Killing with a nice cast. It didn't disappoint me, but although the title clearly hints at it, I was a bit disappointed that the main focus wasn't the heist itself so much. They could have made that part of the movie a bit longer IMO.

reply

Yes, the whole cast is great. For my money, Julie Harris really stands out-completely cast against type, as the ruthless ''brains'' behind the robbery. She is (as usual) teriffic!.

reply

Just found my VHS copy of this and watched it last night. I could've tossed the last 20 or so minutes, but thoroughly enjoyed it up to then. It occurred to me there'd be no way they'd be able to pull off a similar heist nowadays because most people would buy their playoff tickets with credit cards or online! And those ticket prices floored me: $5 to $7.50 for a playoff game. Seeing all that cash made me wanna rob somebody!

"May I bone your kipper, Mademoiselle?"

reply

Not really - the pacing and the presentation of the story were rather clumsy and kind of jarring throughout and on top of that, a lot of the stuff was pretty ridiculous (like the whole notion of McClain staging these "tests" for his prospective accomplices early in the movie - a flimsy excuse to stage a string of action sequences if ever there was one. And the romantic interlude at the red-lensed beach as well as the scene where the bizarrely overacting landlords offs the broad are just plain silly). It's a truly outstanding cast, of course, but none of the big name players is anywhere near their top form - and how could they be, considering the not-so-convinving character writing and the often stilted dialogue they're given (Hackman seems to have gotten a good dry-run for Popeye Doyle, though). I did rate the film 6/10, but that's mainly because I really have a soft spot for these late 60's - early 70's urban crime movies and this little number had these basic vibes I dig, too... and the Quincy Jones score fit like a... well, glove, I guess.



"facts are stupid things" Ronald Reagan

reply

Nice time capsule. Quincy Jones score. But doesn't hold up along side the better heist films.

reply