Snoozefest


After watching this movie I had a headache and collapsed in bed

reply

It's definitely a headache for the majority of people. Probably 90% or maybe higher. You have to have the mindset to like this kinda movie. That's why I don't even recommend it to anyone anymore, even though I consider it to be one of the greatest films ever made.

btw, did you watch this before or after Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull ?(checked out your profile) Now THAT movie was a horrendous piece of junk. Imagine, two of the richest and most popular directors/producers of all time, having all the experience, resources, actors and hunderds of other people working for them, and all they come up with is a painful trite. Yet we still have millions flocking to see it.

It's just different mindsets.



reply

[deleted]

gauli, I have noticed you have posted several messages about this film so enlighten us with a full and detailed critical assessment as to why this is such a great film?

reply

BwlBoy, first, as it was the whole point of my initial post, I expected you to realize why I don't want to, as you say, "enlighten" you about this film, especially someone who's already seen it and did not like it. So I'm not going to do that. Why? Because there's nothing to enlighten. You didn't like it. There's no "secret message" that the original poster did not perceive.. It was all on screen.

That's usually the attitude I have toward certain "art films". It's not.. some artificial anatomy that needs to be perfected, because it's straight from the director's mindset. No traditional narrations, no standardization based on current filmmaking.. and no explanation.. It's very subjective. That's probably why it's easier to classify the new Indiana Jones movie as a "horrendous piece of junk"; Because it literally failed to do its job.

As for me, I liked Sayat Nova because it felt naturally exceptional. Mirror is another good example, where you(not you) watch with fascination and wonder what's the trick(specially in the point of view of another filmmaker). Why does such bizarre imagery make so much sense? In this case, Parajanov is like a magician, with his "secret" buried from me, the viewer. His work cannot be replicated(watch The Fountain, or The Fall). not with a larger crew, not with better resources, and specially not with a bigger budget.

that's usually what happens with great "art films". It's not just the color or the beauty, but the intention of the director that intrigues me so. There's something visually absurd and true about Parajanov's work, it's very hard to put in words.

reply

gauli, I have to give you credit for the passionate way in which you try to defend the merits of this film.

reply

[deleted]

gauli, you articulated exactly the feeling I had when the film was over, that whatever it is -- and who could possibly articulate THAT? -- it is above all "true." Even if it were in a language I spoke, the film itself speaks its own imagistic language, with each image something between a word and an ideogram. And the story that is told in that imagistic language -- something about the life of the "poet," which could be a metaphor for any of us I suppose -- that story is true.





There, daddy, do I get a gold star?

reply

[deleted]

Imagine: One embarks into the parallels of war. Years later, one returns, triumphant, with a headache and will most likely collapse into bed and indulge in what is to be a "Snoozefest". So, I agree, this movie is a lot like war... with additional beauty... and inspiring perfection.


I was trying my hardest to make a Jacques Tati movie.

reply

[deleted]

I didn't snooze, but I didn't like this film overall. Not saying it's a crap...it isn't. I respect a lot of the amazing staging in some of the scenes. I also like movies with a lot of abstraction, for example I love Jodorowsky. For whatever reason, I just didn't feel anything for this one. Not sure that I have enough background or knowledge about Armenia to appreciate it as others do.

.

reply