MovieChat Forums > Oliver! (1968) Discussion > Do you think Faggin ever slept w/ any of...

Do you think Faggin ever slept w/ any of the boys?


Like, if he got very desperate. He seemed to favourite Artful Dodger. lol And it's not like he could find a date!

reply

This argument has been raised in conjunction with the character of Fagin in OLIVER TWIST many times. The novel, while never specifically saying, certainly gives the character of Fagin plenty of suspect to which the reader could assume Fagin had more devious intentions than just teaching the boys he housed to steal from him. This of course, is and will always be part of the controversy surrounding the character of Fagin. Alec Guinness's interpretation of FAGIN has more "hints" of this than does Ron Moody or Ben Kingsley in the Polanski version.

There is NO CREEPIER Fagin than Alec Guinness. Nothing lovable about the character in the way he looked or played the part. In fact, his Fagin is RIGHT UP THERE with Robert Helpmann's CHILD CATCHER in CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG in overall creepiness. Like the Child Catcher, he makes you think that he could be capable of ANYTHING.

reply

Cliff has it right about Guiness' portrayal of Fagin. That man is extremely creepy and at times seems to have somewhat of a lecherous look on his face (e.g. when Oliver is playing the game with him in the morning while the rest of the kids are "at work"). Ron Moody's version, on the other hand, is quite tame and more of a "foster father" type who doesn't have any alternative to stealing.

I suppose if Fagin got really, uhm, desperate, he could go to the local brothel and pay a woman for uhm, certain favors. He did have quite a few riches in his treasure chest.

reply

Fagin strikes me as the type of character that doesn't want or need sex. Certainly, the way Ron Moody plays him he was, i.e. in the line, "a wife you can keep anyway, I'd rather sleep anyway".

The Alec Guinness portrayal? That's another story entirely. Nothing remotely nice or endearing about him.

reply

One of the dirty secrets of the Victorian Era, both in GB and elsewhere, was the prevalence of child prostitution, which is mentioned in such classics of erotica as MY SECRET LIFE. There were plenty of Fagin-type pimps who prostituted orphans, both boys and girls.

God is subtle, but He is not malicious. (Albert Einstein)

reply

This has nothing to do with the discussion but I am watching the movie on Netflix and the above line came on just as I viewed the OP. Too funny.

reply

It's funny because on another thread here I posted a few minutes ago about how I always found the scenes of Ron Moody with the boys charged with a certain homoeroticism. I prefaced this by saying I expect people will think I was imagining it...

reply

I thought the same thing when watching the film recently,even the name fagan suggested to me of the deragatory term for homosexual *beep* even thought some of the songs were suggestive of homosexuality and sexual innuendo.''Consider yourself One of us....If it should chance to be.We should see Some harder days.''The orphans are metaphorical for outsiders or different as homosexuals often are.

reply

While I can see why this question was asked was there ever anything,even as a subtext, in Dickens' novel which suggested it? I doubt it, we really should not bring modern day sensibilities to older works.

That is not to say that this sort of thing did not happen in 19th century just as it does today.

reply

Oh I definitely didn't see the subtext in Dickens' novel. I just fancied I saw it in the way Ron Moody's Fagin and his boys were played and directed. Though I am not yet convinced my mind wasn't bringing it to the scenes myself.

reply

As Fagin himself tells us, he'd rather sleep, anyway! I'd say that the marked absence of soap, heat, running water and flushable toilets would tend to put a damper on even the most urgent erotic impulse. P.U.!

reply

I'm sure it's hinted that he is a pedophile.

_____________________________________________________

PAVI! SHUT THE *beep* UP!

reply

I've heard of a book called The Friendly Dickens, which goes deeper into the character of Fagin and what Dickens may have been intending him to be. Pedophelia was not really something that people in Victorian times discussed regularly and openly, so Dickens couldn't actually be open about it in the novel. This is probably why he went with pickpocketing instead of child prostitution (although many children were trained to be thieves during the time).

reply

I have a copy of The Friendly Dickens, and you're quite right...Dickens may have been "speaking in code" to hint at what he couldn't say. He may have also hinted that Fagin may be gay--in the novel, he seems to have a bit of a lisp and calls everyone "dear".

As for pimping/prostitution, Nancy does say (in the novel and the stage version, I can't remember if it's in the movie) that she'd started thieving for Fagin when she was six, and now the streets were the only home she'd have until her death. The hint is that, for girls like Nancy at least, they start off by picking pockets and "graduate" to...other things. (The boys, it's hinted, graduate to higher crimes like house-breaking...Bill Sikes "started small.")

That book also mentions another intriguing fact...Dickens named Fagin after a worker at the factory he was shipped to as a child. Bob Fagin looked after twelve-year-old Charles when the younger boy was sick and taught him the ropes of the factory. Charles repaid his kindness by...naming a loathsome villain after him. Jeez, with friends like that...

So why would Dickens do this when Bob had been kind to him? (One wonders how the real Bob Fagin felt if he ever read his old charge's novel.) Norrie Epstein, the book's author, speculated that it could have been a case of Dickens associating Bob, no matter how kind the older boy was, with a painful time in his life that Charles saw as dirty and degrading. To claim friendship with one of the warehouse boys would have meant that Charles WAS one of them...and this was something he wanted to deny.

Or, alternately, perhaps Bob Fagin's "friendly overtures" toward Charles had
an ulterior motive... (Remember that in Victorian England, homosexuality was not only believed to be a sin but was an actual crime, as it would be until the 1960s.)

To quote Ms. Epstein herself:

...perhaps, and here one can only be tentative, he felt shame about some of the activities that went on there...Bob Fagin may have looked out for Charles in the same way older students at public schools dote on younger ones. Always sensitive to nuances in emotions and behavior, Charles might have sensed that Bob's feelings for him were more than that of a friend...[I]t is unlikely that Dickens participated in any sexual activities. But he must have known about them, and as a child, he must have felt part of the sordid atmosphere...It just might be that Bob Fagin, the man who was such a "friend" to Charles, might not have been a friend after all.


If this speculation is true, maybe this gave rise to the homosexual tendencies that many critics have seen in Fagin?

reply

I'd say quite possibly. He looks like he's capable of anything.

reply

Like, if he got very desperate. He seemed to favourite Artful Dodger. lol And it's not like he could find a date!


Just WHAT happened in this movie to make you jump to such a loathsome conclusion?

Also, is your LOL in reference to an adult sexually assaulting a child?

reply

I think it's just the fact that Fagin lives with all those young boys that made the original poster jump to that conclusion. There is no indication that Fagin ever abused the boys sexually. He only abused them through grooming them to be criminals, having them believe they'd be "the greatest men of all time" when he knew they wouldn't amount to squat.

reply

I'm going to go ahead and say that pedophelia didn't exist in the world this fantasy musical inhabits. Otherwise during the song 'Boy for Sale" Oliver would have been snatched up a lot quicker.

reply

I'm going to go ahead and say that pedophelia didn't exist in the world this fantasy musical inhabits. Otherwise during the song 'Boy for Sale" Oliver would have been snatched up a lot quicker.


By this guy, no doubt :D

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/67/Herbert_-_Family_Guy.png

reply

Why would you even ASK a question like this??? #1 Your question suggests a morbid twisted curiosity on your part.. And #2.. It's a freakin movie!!! Nothing more.. Get a life...honestly!

reply