Conchis=Ben Kingsley
Nicholas=Paul Bettany
I also thought of a director: Michael Radford. I interviewed Radford in in 1994 in Portland, Oregon when he was on a press tour of the U.S. for IL POSTINO. He's a cultured and highly intelligent man, and I enjoy his films tremendously. I thought he'd be absolutely perfect to direct THE MAGUS. I thought I'd throw him the idea, so I wrote him a letter through his official website. There was no reply, but I wasn't expecting one.
Here's a slightly abridged version of the letter I wrote to him:
Dear Michael Radford,
My name is Kirill Galetski. I am a Russian-American journalist who interviewed you almost ten years ago in Portland, Oregon on the press tour in conjunction with the film IL POSTINO. I am now writing from Moscow, where I currently live and work.
I am compelled to write to you at this point in time because I have long been cogitating over an idea for a film which I feel you could realise in the most definitive way. Before I go on, I must emphatically say that I am not offering a script or the possibility of myself writing a script, but merely an idea which you would take or leave at your discretion and develop entirely through your own channels and capacities. My hope is that you will take it and run with it, for at least from this end, it seems like a journey well worth undertaking.
The idea I have in mind is a film adaptation of John Fowles' novel THE MAGUS. I received the book as a gift from an Irish friend of mine who is particularly fond of the author. I have been imbued with some of that fondness since reading THE COLLECTOR and THE MAGUS.
While reading THE MAGUS, I couldn't help but imagine it as a film. In finishing the book, I had a vivid picture in my mind of the story as a film directed by Michael Radford, with Paul Bettany as the protagonist Nicholas Urfe. I can't really go into why I saw it this way - that would be the subject of self-analysis which I won't go into here and now - but I see that at this point in your life, you are in a good position, having the means and resources at your disposal, to see such a project through to realisation.
I have also read some reviews of the book, and in one of these, a phrase caught my attention which may sum up why one would undertake the transformation of this book into visual media and a different temporal field: namely, the reviewer described the book as "leading us to question both the reality of our own lives and the relationship between a work of fiction and reality." This may seem like a gross generalisation, but it reminded me of what a possible reason for adapting 1984 to film could have been.
I understand that you may not have the same affinity for Fowles' book as I have, but I urge to examine (or re-examine, as the case may be) the world of the novel and consider it for a possible project. My intuition is that it should have a certain appeal for you. It would also be a better excuse than many for spending time on a Greek island - a setting not too far removed geographically from your favourite Mediterranean stomping grounds.
At any rate, I've been meaning to write this letter for a long time, and so now I've done so. I do not expect a personal response, but would certainly welcome one should you have the inclination.
Sincerely,
Kirill Galetski.
reply
share