What's Wrong With Being Athiest?


That priest really overreacted. He didn't said you can't be Catholic, don't fault him for being Atheist than.

"Smoking kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life."-Brooke Shields

reply

It was just to add drama and conflict to the movie, Hammer films did these kinds of things all the time, you shouldn't take a 1968 B horror film so seriously.





reply

I think the point was that he comes off as wanting man to be honest but, when it comes down to it, he wasn't ready for THAT much honesty from the young man. There are certain lines you don't cross and I guess that was one of them.

reply

God doesn't believe in atheists.

reply

Yet he supposedly created man, which means he doesn't believe something he himself created. Then again, we all know man created god and has been creating new gods for centuries.

reply



I was glad the film did not overtly cast atheism in a bad light though. Sure, from the perspective of the Monsignor it was bad, but the film's overall point of view did not do so.

He did give the sign of the cross at the end but I was worried he would be the one praying and that did not occur.


.

reply

This was set in the late Victorian age; the kid was sitting at the dinner table of a Monsignor of the Catholic Church; the kid came there to impress his girlfriends' mom (and presumably her uncle she lived with as well). The line is just there to build tension and to give Maria an excuse for sneaking around later in the film; and to show his spiritual growth by the end of the film.

reply

You cant use cross agaisnt vampires.

--------------------------------------------------
If you want horror - tune in the news channel.

reply

I think the monsignor was extremely religious so the fact that someone came to his house and denied the existence of God offended him very much so. I believe he interpreted it as Paul saying it was silly for them to believe in God because there is no possible way something like God could exist. That isn't what he was saying at all, but that's how the monsignor interpreted it.

Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.

reply

I think it is important to note that Paul realises the importance of Faith at the end.Hammer horror films were deeply conservative (and much the better for it I say !),Religon is always respected (although individual practitioners not necessarily so), the "old ways" shown to be effective,and of course,evil is defeated and the status quo restored by the end of the movie.

Gordon P. Clarkson

reply

Yes, that's what I love about Hammer films. Good always triumphs over evil and everything is the way it should be in the end. Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy gloomy endings for some movies, but it's also nice to be reminded that no matter how bad things get there is still always hope.

Death lives in the Vault of Horror!

reply

[deleted]

Ultra religious people can at times be offended by what they perceive of as rejection of God, especially in the time and place of this film... My Grampa was not a priest, but quite religious and would've had a similar but milder reaction had I announced I was atheist at, say, thanksgiving dinner.

reply

I am not an atheist, but I don't think there's anything wrong with it if the persons concerned are educated and honest.

The film did not really have a problem with Paul's atheism. We know he's an atheist from the start, and he's already being portrayed as courageous and sincere.

The script assigned Paul a character arc, however. After having seen supernatural vampirism as "the real deal", and seeing how the Count was vanquished and banished via total physical dissolution through liturgical means, Paul quite logically, given the story line, concludes that the supernatural, and supernatural evil, are real ... and that the Church was right about vampires and how they can and should be defeated. So embracing religion ends up looking like the sensible thing for Paul to do.

reply

I think it was the fact that Paul is a guest in the monsignor's home and is dating his niece (who he clearly loves like a daughter and for whom he has become a surrogate father). It was sort of a double insult to him then.

If Paul had been some stranger off the street, the monsignor likely would've have had such a strong reaction.

To the monsignor's credit, when he found Maria upset later he seemed to be willing to accept Paul in her life (once he'd had a chance to cool down a bit). And, when he learns Dracula is alive and the priest from the village is apparently under the vampire's control, Paul is the only person he trusts to protect Maria.

I sort of suspect that Paul being so blunt earlier impressed him. Even if he couldn't accept or agree with Paul's beliefs (or, lack of), his courage in saying what he did made the monsignor think that at least Paul has a great deal of courage.

reply