MovieChat Forums > The Boston Strangler (1968) Discussion > Earliest film I've seen that 'gay' was u...

Earliest film I've seen that 'gay' was used


There must be earlier ones, but I was surprised in the bar scene when the man refers to himself as being 'gay.'

reply

Yeah it's not easy to imagine why this movie was so controversial back in 1968. The gay stuff wasn't the last of the controversial subject matter in this movie. It's pretty good too.

What's the Spanish for drunken bum?

reply

The 1938 film "Bringing Up Baby" has the word "gay" (and yes, it's used to mean homosexual).

reply

There's also The Detective with Frank Sinatra from the same year that has a gay character and also shows homosexuals hanging out but in way less flattering light. And there's also Advise & Consent from way back in 1962, also with Henry Fonda where homosexuality is also shown in a very depraved way. And, of course, The Children's Hour from even earlier - 1961. All the ones except Boston Strangler have homosexuality as a plot device and are time capsules of the twisted way gays were made out to look in the public's eyes back then. So this film actually treats homosexuality rather liberally for its time.

I'm here, Mr. Man, I can not tell no lie and I'll be right here 'till the day I die

reply

[deleted]

Well, I wasn't writing about the way certain characters in those movies acted towards homosexuals, I meant the general way homosexuality was presented. In the universe of The Children's Hour, which was most likely true to life, MacLaine's character was forced to lead a repressed life and finally commit suicide because of how society looked upon being gay. Now, you might take that character's tragedy as social criticism about the bad way gays were treated back then, but I think that wasn't quite the intention. The author of the orginal play personally stated that it wasn't about homosexuality, it was about what a child's lie can do. That would make the aforementioned tragdy just a plot device that shows lesbians as innerly twisted people that can only end in tragedy. Even MacLaine herself said in an interview that at the time of filming she took her character killing herself without any surprise. It was just the way things were back then and the way gays were protrayed in cinema.
I must admit I haven't actually seen Advise & Consent and The Detective, but I watched a very informative documentary on homosxuality in movies called The Celluloid Closet. The standpoint that I took in my previous post is taken from that movie. It not only analysed all the aforementined movies and illustrated the views expressed with plenty of clips, but also featured interviews of homosexuals that lived when those movies were first released. The interviewees talk about what it was like to see such films on their initial run and what the general atmosphere towards gays of the time was. I really think The Celluloid Closet is a must-see if you're trying to have a discussion abot homosexuality in the moves. But I don't recall The Boston Strangler being mentioned in it...

I'm here, Mr. Man, I can not tell no lie and I'll be right here 'till the day I die

reply

** Well, I wasn't writing about the way certain characters in those movies acted towards homosexuals, I meant the general way homosexuality was presented. **

The word "homosexuality" is vague when you are referring to what characters actually say or do at the instigation of screenwriters and directors. Say you are referring to "the general way homosexuality is presented" in the 21st century. To continue your approach in a "general way" would you lump The Kids Are Alright and Brokeback Mountain together with gay porn? Consider that any kind of porn movie was difficult for most Americans to find in the year 1968 when Boston Strangler came out. So what was the "general way homosexuality was presented" in the era before home video made porn available? Would you include the lyric in Gee Officer Krupke in which Riff (Russ Tamblyn) sings "My brother wears a dress" in 1961? When you go general about something that never existed (Gore Vidal said in the 1960s there are no homosexual people, there are just homosexual acts) you have to sweep together every small detail.

** In the universe of The Children's Hour, which was most likely true to life, **

How do you know? Did you attend a private girls' boarding school in Massachusetts in 1961 or prior ? (Lillian Hellman said it took place in Massachusetts.)

** MacLaine's character was forced to lead a repressed life and finally commit suicide because of how society looked upon being gay. **

Nobody is forced to commit suicide. You can argue that a screenwriter or playwright can force a fictional character to commit suicide. In what way does Martha (MacLaine's character) deserve a comparison with any allegedly closeted gay person who committed suicide, such as Hemingway? Hemingway was real. Martha wasn't.

** Now, you might take that character's tragedy as social criticism about the bad way gays were treated back then, but I think that wasn't quite the intention. The author of the orginal play personally stated that it wasn't about homosexuality, it was about what a child's lie can do. That would make the aforementioned tragdy just a plot device that shows lesbians as innerly twisted people that can only end in tragedy. **

Martha is the only possibly lesbian or bi-curious character out of dozens in the two - hour movie. How did the Children's Hour screenwriter or director William Wyler show lesbians in general as "innerly twisted?"

I have seen The Celluloid Closet. It is available to anyone for free viewing on You Tube in multiple parts. I disagree with some of its innuendo. How do we know the gay people featured in soundbite interviews speak for all or even a majority of LGBT people from back in the day? Read some of the work of Gertrude Stein. She loved many movies, books and plays even if they had no lesbian characters with whom she could identify.

The Celluloid Closet gives me the false impression that every single person who ever performed a same - sex act had the same emotional reaction to sitting through a movie that alluded to opposite sex relationships only during its 90 minutes, two hours or four hours (i.e. Gone With The Wind). The documentary insinuates that all these categorized people, including everyone who has been labeled a closeted gay by some gay historians (and who committed suicide like Hemingway), secretly longed to sit through a two - hour movie starring a sympathetic "gay" character. They would have loved to see and hear James Baldwin's David from the 1956 book Giovanni's Room or to see and hear Gertrude Stein's persona ... but no! Hollywood studio moguls like Jack Warner forced them to think that homosexuality (people? acts?) was twisted.

The studio executives in Hollywood forced millions of these poor emotionally suffering people to watch a lot of "heterosexual" characters and a few twisted "homosexual" ones. The moviegoers' inner turmoil increased until some committed suicide and others became nasty, hateful queens like Perez Hilton.

I don't buy that. For one thing, what about the millions of secondary characters whose sexuality never was alluded to ? Like the characters Tony Randall played in several Rock Hudson films ? What about Eve Arden? She was a star of a television sitcom who had an occasional boyfriend there, but in movies she was a supporting character who rarely, if ever, paired with the leading man in the end. Does that mean she was supposed to be gay like Selma Blair's character of Vivian allegedly was (not verified) in Legally Blonde?

Secondly, people who were annoyed by a lot of movies in the 1950s and 1960s were being told by their parents and schoolteachers to read books, instead. James Baldwin created "David" for millions of people to enjoy in 1956. There was no Internet to distract you from reading. These are more reasons I am tired of hearing about an alleged anti - gay holocaust in the 1950s and 1960s -- featuring a few invisible Americans who were a lot like Joseph Goebbels.

I know some nice older gay men who were perfectly happy to identify with "heterosexual" characters -- especially female ones like Dolly Levi -- throughout decades of movie watching. Lesbians, in particular, have been known to savor any movie or book whose protagonist is female. "Women are women," said Gloria Steinem in the early 1970s when Rita Mae Brown asked her if lesbians might ruin the women's movement. Then you have the Civil War reenactment lesbians, mostly on the East Coast. They never say the reason for Mary Lincoln's issues was that she was a closeted lesbian. They don't care what she did in private.

For these reasons people should take The Celluloid Closet with a grain of salt. It's trying to prove that millions of LGBT people felt this way or that in movie theaters during the evil 1950s and 1960s. That's very speculative.

reply

you mean Selma Blair from Legally Blonde.

reply

That's her! Selma Blair. If people can't tell the difference between her and Vivian in Legally Blonde, then why should I believe either one of them ever has had a same - sex bedroom experience ?

Memo to Selma / Vivian watchers: It's my turn to call the shots. Every character Vanessa Redgrave ever played has had all sorts of bedroom experiences. Some of them are alive during the experimental 1960s. Others aren't. They don't use labels for themselves (womyn, butch, etc.) because they don't want their screenwriters, of whom they are in search, to burn any more midnight oil. Conserve it.

The truth: Those who try to out Selma and / or Vivian have too much time on their hands. I used up just a moment for Vanessa Redgrave as you can see.

reply

Not really - Cary Grant meant jolly. He just happened to be wearing a lady's dressing gown.

reply

"(and yes, it's used to mean homosexual)"

Purely opinion. Just because that's what your 21st-century mental filter told you it meant, doesn't mean that's what Cary Grant meant...

reply

Not to mention the poor, forgotten screenwriter.

reply

[deleted]

"Gay" was definitley used as a synonym for "happy"/"jolly" when Bringing Up Baby was made, but the way the sentence is structured is odd. If Cary's character had meant "happy"/"jolly", one could replace "gay" with either of those words and the sentence would remain intact.

The line is "I just turned gay all of a sudden!"

But "I just turned happy/jolly all of a sudden!" doesn't sound quite right, does it?

I'm not necessarily saying that "gay" meant "homosexual" in that movie, I'm just trying to give a new way to looak at the line in support of the theory that it does refer to homosexuality.

reply

It was still normally used as 'happy/jolly' in 1950's. Except perhaps in gay underground world.

Otherwise we wouldn't have Elvis singing "I'm gay in the morning, at night I feel the same" in late 1956. :) Song was Paralyzed, a minor hit.



reply

As soon as I came to this thread 'Brining Up Baby' came to my mind.

There are possibly earlier examples in pre-code films but I can't think of them. People who think that the word "Gay" only meant "happy/cheerful" back in the 1930s are pretty naive. Possibly in mid-west of America, but "The Roaring Twenties" (a term coined many years after the decade) had occurred and a fair amount of sexual liberalisation had occurred, especially within Hollywood. It was of course around this time that Randolph Scott and Cary Grant were living with each other and many gossip columns weren't too subtle with their innuendos.

If you (not the poster I'm replying to, but others in here) want to think that the word "gay" in terms of sexuality wasn't used before the 50s, 40s or 30s that's fine, but you should be aware that you're wrong.

reply