MovieChat Forums > 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) Discussion > I watched it expecting to be bored...

I watched it expecting to be bored...


I ended up being mindblown and didn't get bored at all. The visuals are so amazing and very impressive for an almost-50-year-old film. I was also impressed by the underlying themes of existentialism, human evolution, artificial intelligence and extraterrestrial life.

Such a brilliant movie.

All the people I know who watched it before me got bored though. And to be fair, I can't blame them 'cause this doesn't have a plot or explosions or big action or fight scenes. Maybe it's just not for them.

Anybody else who originally thought it was a dull movie?

reply

Great first post at IMDb, minotaur61!

reply

It's not my first post. I've been an imdb member for many years now and I've posted quite a few topics over the years. I wonder why all my previous posts aren't showing up. Weird.

Thanks though.

reply

After having heard about how absolutely, utterly amazing this film was, I finally got it a few years back in WallyWorld. It cost me all of $3.78 plus tax.

Taking it home, I put it on, expecting to really enjoy it, especially after hearing so many good things about it. To tell the truth, I couldn't even finish it the first time. In fact, I thought there was something wrong with my DVD.

Coming to this board, and hearing all the good things about it once more, I decided to give it one more chance. My initial impression after I finally finished it was reinforced, as I found it a dull, plodding and utterly pointless film. I really and honestly wish I could say otherwise.

I'm glad that so many found it enjoyable, as evidenced by the posts on this board. I, however, did not.

reply

It's possible that all those good things you'd heard about it raised unrealistic expectations. Or, maybe it's one of those films that just doesn't resonate with you personally. And there's nothing wrong with that. At least you gave it a try.

It does help to have seen it on a big screen the first time; but how many people today ever have that opportunity?

For me, it remains one of the best & purest of films made, a genuine masterpiece that yields something new every time I see it.


reply

It's possible that all those good things you'd heard about it raised unrealistic expectations.

Different expectations probably because the movie itself exceeds any viewer's concept of what film is. 

reply

Well said! :)

reply

[deleted]

I need to congratulate you, sir, on a wonderful post. 2001: A Space Odyssey is my by far favorite film, but when seeing someone disagree in such a gallant manner, I have to applaude. Kudos to you, sir.

reply

I thought it was dull at first and didn't get it then I watched it a lot older on the 4k print and thought it was the greatest piece of cinema I ever witnessed.

reply

graphs and equations

reply

2001 is definitely one of those films that's such a more intimate, emotional and visual experience on a Big Screen. As long as it's HD, 4k being great but not essential. To watch it on the old 4x3 TVs was still fantastic for me but it's full impact didn't come until I got my first 50" HD Widescreen some 12 years ago. It's no comparison... And then on the ACTUAL Big Screen, unreal!

reply

Hopefully the board trolls won't get this post deleted. I'll just keep trying, though. (That's for you, trolls).

IMO this film speaks a particular "language" which is unlike that "spoken" by most all other movies. If you watch this movie expecting to find it speaking that more typical language of film, you'll be disappointed. You won't be able to grasp what it's saying, so naturally you won't connect with it.


The Dumpster gives a whole new meaning to "red" states.

reply

I'm in complete agreement. Kubrick was not only a master craftsman to the point of perfectionism, as well as possessing a ferocious intelligence, he also had the soul of a truly visionary artist -- and he brought all of those qualities to this masterpiece in full measure.

Meanwhile, the current cultural POV has all too often diminished considerably to fanboy geek literalism, without any real sense of the lyrical & the poetic. While 2001 certainly has plenty of dazzling surface, enough to match & even outdo much of today's filmmaking, it has an astonishing depth & substance that so many contemporary films lack.

reply

Beautifully said! (Let's see if they delete THIS one. )


The Dumpster gives a whole new meaning to "red" states.

reply

The babbling brook of lost memories has returned...lol.

"gonna throw, my raincoat in the river...gonna toss, my umbrella in the sea"...Sammy Turner.

reply

the current cultural POV has all too often diminished considerably to fanboy geek literalism


This ! All those popular youtube channels (Everything wrong with..., honest trailers) seem to miss the point of movies completely. It's funny how people often criticize Kubrick of being too cold and mechanical, too much focused on technique, yet those things actually apply to those cynical reviewers, not Kubrick.

reply

I couldn't agree more. And you know, I've never felt Kubrick to be cold and mechanical; it's simply that creatively, he takes a detached approach in that he observes & allows us to observe with him. That he understands human emotion & what it can do, both positively & negatively, is evident from his body of work. I don't see how someone supposedly so cold and mechanical could have given us Paths of Glory, for instance. And 2001 is brimming with passion & transcendent feeling of its own.

reply

those things actually apply to those cynical reviewers, not Kubrick

That's a very sharp and accurate insight!




The Dumpster gives a whole new meaning to "red" states.

reply

I'm in complete agreement. Kubrick was not only a master craftsman to the point of perfectionism, as well as possessing a ferocious intelligence, he also had the soul of a truly visionary artist -- and he brought all of those qualities to this masterpiece in full measure.

Meanwhile, the current cultural POV has all too often diminished considerably to fanboy geek literalism, without any real sense of the lyrical & the poetic. While 2001 certainly has plenty of dazzling surface, enough to match & even outdo much of today's filmmaking, it has an astonishing depth & substance that so many contemporary films lack.
I appreciate all of these things. Kubrick was a brilliant film maker, and I usually enjoyed his films, especially Dr Strangelove. Paths of Glory was another film that I thought was well-done as was Full Metal Jacket. And I agree that the technical aspects of 2001: ASO are spectacular.

The problem was that after watching it for two and a half mind-numbing hours, I was left with the question of what I just watched. Like I said on another thread, I kept watching, and expecting it to get better or at least to get to the point, only to find out to my great disappointment, that it had no real point that I could see.

Sorry, but for me, this film was a huge disappointment, as was The Shining. Although to be fair, part of it was that I just did not care that much for Jack Nicholson of that time. He has 'grown' on me since.

reply

Mind numbing lol.

You take drugs, Danny?



Buy The Ticket, Take The Ride

reply

Mind numbing lol.

You take drugs, Danny?
Do small-minded people engage in personal insults because it is easier than making other arguments?

There are films that I really enjoyed and at the same time, were hated by others. Rather than attacking these people I engaged them in conversation about the film. We don't always end up agreeing but we at least have a polite discussion. It appears from the quoted post, that you lack this capability. It's sad.




reply

You do realize that attacking the poster rather than presenting a well-reasoned response is what's truly sad, never mind exhibits your own lack of capacity, yes?


The Dumpster gives a whole new meaning to "red" states.

reply

The point of this film is if you ignore your ancestors, you will live a zombified life of long tortured flight, only to wind up as dead fetal tissue floating through the dark cosmic night.

"gonna throw, my raincoat in the river...gonna toss, my umbrella in the sea"...Sammy Turner.

reply

Not A Caddy fan, I see..



Buy The Ticket, Take The Ride

reply

it had no real point that I could see

Is that the best you can do? I'm serious. Your comment seems to me like you're just saying, "Duhhhh!" Put another way, it's as if you expended no mental energy in connecting with what remains after almost half a century one of (if not THE) greatest works of cinema.

How is it so many of us not only grasp this film's point but find it one of the most important in the history of human culture while you see "no point?"


The Dumpster gives a whole new meaning to "red" states.

reply

gary, it sounds to me as if you at least gave it a fair chance, with an open mind, and it just didn't resonate with you. Maybe a future viewing will change your mind, maybe it won't. I wish you could have seen it on a huge screen, in some classic movie palace, as I did in 1968 -- that does make a real difference in this case, in that it deeply immerses the viewer in the film. In some ways, the experience of the film is the point, I think.

But one viewer's experience is going to be very different from another's, after all. :)

reply

its a masterpiece

reply

No it isn't

reply