A pre-GODFATHER gangster classic


If you love movies, this Roger Corman entry into the gangster genre is a revelation. The story is told in a series of loosely connected episodes that supposedly document real circumstances leading up to the St. Valentine's Day Massacre. A narrator tells us what we need to know for each scene, moving the action forward with an astonishing speed and clarity. Corman stamps the Docudrama style with this convention, and it really works; the immediate story is constantly informed by the narrator's voice-of-god telling of characters' past, present, and future circumstances. Even though the visual dimension of the film never escapes its studio locations, Corman's staging and his work with the actors gives it a sense of urgency. Corman has never really been talked about as an actor's director, but here he apparently had the time, the script, and I assume the inclination to let the players rip through the ceiling. The performances are all terrific. Jason Robards (looking nothing like Al Capone!) has an insane, maniacal smile that is often more unsettling than his violent rages. The camera seems to follow him around without the interruption of a cut; his mood swings keep his men in line and the viewer disarmed. True, Robards carries on, but it seems appropriate for the movie. George Segal has two great scenes that seem to play out without interruption. The one with Barbara Hale is a doozy. In fact, all through the film, Corman showcases characters in often ironic situations creating a tapestry of collective behavior that gives the film an amazing sense of vitality and, for the time (pre BONNIE AND CLYDE), an uncharacteristic sense of humanity. Its the odd, subjective character detail, one after another, that builds this story; we get involved not in the melodramatics of the action, per se, but rather in the lives of those individuals that come together who create the story. In a very real way, Corman's approach pre-figures and creates the template for Coppola's internal view of the Mafia in the GODFATHER movies. It lacks the scope of Coppola's saga, for sure. But it sets the precedent. Corman was a terrific director. This movie was the only one he did for a major studio, 20th Century Fox. As a director, a major studio suited Corman, the artist. But as a producer, Corman has written about his distain for studio waste and book keeping. So for the next few years, before giving up directing altogether, Corman continued to work on his own under his safe and financially responsible American International umbrella. If you love movies, this is one you will cherish. Please give it a look. It a rich, satisfying, and disarmingly complex little gangster movie; terrifically entertaining.

reply

[deleted]

JEAN Hale. Not Barbara by any stretch.

reply

So who was Barbara Hale? The one on the old Perry Mason series?

I agree with "nfaust1"'s critique of the movie. It's true, you often are distracted by the obviously fake sets and cheap production values. But the performances are dead-on. Just that sneer on Siegel's face and his air of cockiness. The story is told with clarity and is greatly enhanced by the brief, insightful voiceovers that give us background as each new character is introduced. The "on the morning of the last day of his life" voiceovers at the end give a memorable sense of context and fatalism. Even though these men lived by the gun, it reminds us that none of us never knows when the bell will toll.

The massacre itself is still first-rate. Its "gore quotient" is no match for post-Peckinpah and the blood does look unnecessarily fake in color but the scene is well-filmed with its rapid-fire quick cuts. These minor quibbles aside, the scene holds up and was actually quite violent for pre-Bonnie and Clyde Hollywood.

It's also worth mentioning that this is supposedly the first mainstream Hollywood film to so blatantly and repetitively use ethnic slurs. I've heard that that caused a bit of controversy at the time (I'm sure Corman's eyes lit up with delight), although it's been surpassed by today's obscenity-laced fare (e.g., the remake of "Scarface").

This was one of my many favorite movies as a child and I still enjoy many of its scenes. The fight between Siegel and Hale remains a hoot. The documentary quality adds depth, continuity, and credibility (even though I'm not sure how it rates for accurateness). All it needed was a bigger production budget and it would be an unqualified classic.

But it's still "Jake" with me.

reply

Yes, Barbara Hale was in Pery Mason.

The fight between Segal and Jean Hale is very reminiscent of the one between Glenn Ford and Hope Lange in "Pocketful of Miracles," and the scene where Segal terrorizes the bartender for not buying booze from the Moran outfit was a remake of a virtually identical scene in "The Public Enemy" with Cagney.

Besides, any movie with Dick Bakalyan AND Charlie Dierkop is worth the price of admission. I've never been able to tell those two guys apart, and they're both perfect gangsters (Bakalyan was a juvenile delinquent in real life).

But my favorite performer in the film is John Agar, fresh from his academy award winning performance in "The Mole People" (just kidding) as Dion O'Bannion.

Clint Ritchie was also superb as "Machine Gun" Jack McGurn.

reply

Oversplayer--
I must have seen TSVDM at least 50 times over the years and counting--[I have it on tape] and I STILL have to stop and figure out Bakalyan, Dierkop, AND David Canary, in the mix after it's over no matter how many times I see it. All 3 have that 'punched-in-the-nose' look.
So many unbilled greats in this--Nicholson, Mary Grace Canfield from 'Green Acres', Tom Signorelli, Bruce Dern, Dick Miller, Joe Turkel--from 'Paths Of Glory' w/ Ralph 'Bugs' Meeker, [and another Kubrick movie 'The Shining' w/ Nicholson], Russ Conway [source of my below quote]...

I GOTTA TELL YA FRANK. YOU'RE NOT GONNA MAKE IT. SHOULD I GET A PREACHER?

reply

Floydpinque,

Did you know that Joe Turkel was also in Kubrick's very first successful film ("The Killing")? He and Vince Edwards are the two guys who enter the apartment with guns blazing.

I can always distinguish David Canary, particularly since he seems to be taller, and I discovered (on this site) that he is related to Calamity Jane.

But those other two?! If they both ran at the racetrack, they'd be an entry.

reply

I agree totally with your take on Corman's first big-studio gangster flick. However, both this and Bonnie and Clyde appeared in the summer of 1967. Critics of that time wrote it off as a typically mindless excise in graphic bloddletting, and while Warren Beatty's film got all the good reviews, both films were noted for pushing the envelope of screen violence towards the start of the MPAA ratings system a year later.

The look of this film, especially the color red, reminds me of the Poe films from Corman. His cameraman, Milton Krasner, who had excelled earlier in his career in b&w noir like Scarlett Street and The Set-Up, went on to be the first cinematographer to win an Oscar for shooting a widescreen film (Three Coins in the Fountain, 1954) actually wanted to shoot on location in Chicago, but Fox wouldn't go for it and the Clark St. garage was long gone by then any way.

Corman did produce another film for Fox, 1975's Capone, with Ben Gazzara in the title role. That film takes advantage of it's R rating in being more graphic, and even uses stock footage from the earlier Corman-directed version.

I like The St. Valentine's Day Massacre. It's a great gangster film, in many ways the template for The Godfather. It's a character-actor driven movie, and it has all the great character actors of the day in it, guys you've seen in lots of movies and tv from the 60's: Ralph Meeker, Harold J. Stone, Bruce Dern, Paul Richards, David Canary, Joseph Turkel, Leo Gordon, and even Alex Rocco, who plays Moe Green in the first Godfather.
Jack Nicholson has a bit as a heavy, and Frank Silvera steals the movie acting-wise.

This movie is another reason why Roger Corman should get an honorary Oscar.

reply

I cant find this film anywhere, I kinda wanted to see it/ rent it before buying it but since i cant find it anywhere i guess ill jsut order it. Hope its good.

Vader is lukes father Kint is Soze Edword Nortan is Tyler Durdan

reply

nfaust1--
My sentiments exactly on both TSVDM and Roger Corman too. I put these in a posting here a few minutes ago.
Just to clarify--it's Jean Hale, [ex-wife of Dabney Coleman], not Barbara. And when she hit George Segal with that radio she really did clobber him, which is why Corman said that scene took about 4 days to film.
Don't quite know how old you are, but the narrator Paul Frees was also the voice of Boris Badenov and Cap'n Crunch, et. al. It's a long list of his talents--you can actually see and hear him as the wireless microphone reporter in 'War Of The Worlds', and I don't mean the Tom Cruise pic.
The movie takes no sides, just presents the facts, which indeed makes it THE definitive one on the real SVDM events for the most part. Any Chicagoan would find it amusing for the inaccuracies--especially in the Hollywood streets passing for 'Chi-Town', but NYers are used to seeing Toronto/Vancouver BC Canada being portrayed as NYC as well.
Let's hope that Corman gets a Lifetime Achievement Oscar in this lifetime.

I GOTTA TELL YA FRANK. YOU'RE NOT GONNA MAKE IT. SHOULD I GET A PREACHER?

reply

Thanks for the response. You're right: Jean, not Barbara!

Am old enough to have seen the movie in the theater when it first came out! Even then, the name Roger Corman meant something to me. While my buddies were watching Lon Chaney Jr. and Boris Karloff on TV, I was sneaking into the Poe movies, and THE WILD ANGELS! Even by today's standards, those films are impressive. Corman was a driven director. Much is written about the way he'd stretch a dollar, but looking at those low budget, exploitation films today, one does not think "poverty." The Poe movies are all stylishly gothic; visual design perfectly supports the actors and the story that's being told. Even the grittiness of THE WILD ANGELS seems to flow out of the aimless lives the film chronicles. This, to me, says that Corman was on some level seriously considering the material he directed. ST. VALENTINE'S DAY is a film that seems to work on many levels. Corman doesn't merely shoot it up; he examines the situation from all sides. Not only that: the film takes into account the fact that it's recreating an historical event; the way the narrator is used and what he tells us deconstructs the event.

Interesting thought: what would Hollywood be today if there hadn't been a Roger Corman?

reply

[deleted]