MovieChat Forums > Hang 'Em High (1968) Discussion > was this set up for a sequel? spoiler al...

was this set up for a sequel? spoiler alert


At the end of the movie Eastwood gets papers on his next job. Was this meant as a set up for a sequel, or am I over thinking?

reply

Your thought is logical, but to my knowledge, the filmmakers harbored no intention of setting up a sequel. When making the film in the summer of 1967, Eastwood's first two movies with Sergio Leone had just come out in America, and although they grossed well and Eastwood's stock was rapidly rising in Hollywood, the industry probably was not completely sold on him yet and would not have been willing to plan for a sequel. Besides, sequels were not yet a staple of Hollywood.

reply

[deleted]

Planned or not, I think it would have been a perfect setup. Not only does the ending feel somewhat unsatisfying to me, there is quite some unfinished business left. On the one hand, the last two guys that tried to lynch Cooper are still free and he wants to track them down. On the other, there is still this issue with the murderers of Rachels husband, which also raped her. She may have said to let bygones be bygones, but if those were to reappear, maybe even with some connection to the judge, and Cooper setting things right... I'm sure there is an interesting story to tell somewhere in there! Too bad the filmmakers left it as is.

reply

I just watched this movie for the upteenth time and it is really a great western movie. I also thought that their had to be more to this, possibly a "part 2" because of the way it ended. I think that, if this movie had been made in the last 20 years, and Clint was still that age, there would have been another one and maybe a whole franchise of this movie.

I can just see where the two men who were still on the run and Cooper chasing them, catching them and something were to show that they had been involved in the death of Rachel's husband and her rape. I like to see things wrapped up in a nice bow at the end, but that's just me.

I've often wondered why they didn't make a sequel. Of course, Inger Steven's death shortly afterward would have been a blow to trying to do a sequel.

reply

I don't know about a sequel, but with producer Leonard Freeman and director Ted Post coming from TV I wonder if there was an attempt to spin off a TV series...don't know if Clint would have been interested, and the time for Westerns had largely past...

reply

At the end of the movie Eastwood gets papers on his next job. Was this meant as a set up for a sequel, or am I over thinking?


Overthinking I believe.

If you recall, Jed was talking to Rachel about her giving up her search for the rapists. She replied that Jed was still looking for his lynch squad but Jed returned that the end to his search was only in Red Creek. I think that's why the loose ends for Jed. He got the main culprit (Captain Wilson) and the two left were minor players. Rachel would likely never find the rapists and she shouldn't let it consume the rest of her life.

Anyway, that's my take.


Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.

reply