Why Christina dismisses Hilary?


What she said so serious?

reply

I agree.

Hillary may have been ignorant but there was no need to bite her head off and fire her.

She could have explained her position and gently pointed out how she didn't like her comments without being so harsh with her.

reply

I agree and it's one of the problems with the film. Her housekeeper behaves in a hostile and ignorant way yet Christina ignores it.

reply

I think the screenwriter is just bending over backward to show how much Christina is on their side against white prejudice. Tilly's prejudice is something less threatening because Tilly is a "member of the family."

reply

We only saw a small part of Hilary's comments, though Christina could have overheard more. What we heard didn't seem quite to rise to the level of her daughter calling her mom's employee a bitch, so that's more implication that we didn't hear it all.

My guess during the dismissal at the car is that this attitude wasn't news to Christina as they'd seemed to have worked together for some time. But Hilary made a special effort to visit the house in person to not just snoop, but to antagonize her daughter. That crossed a line that Christina wasn't going to tolerate. And as long as she was firing Hilary she also used the chance to tell her what she thought of her taste in art.

reply

It was a definite workplace violation, though, if you think about it -- she went to her boss's house to find out about her boss's daughter's interracial relationship -- none of her business at all -- and when asked "What brings you all the way over here, Hillary?" she makes up a random excuse, and Christina says "Couldn't you have called me to tell me that, Hillary?"

And also before that Hillary has a very condescending, sarcastic tone toward Christina saying her daughter "has been telling me a congratulations is in order and you didn't even know" -- her tone when she says it and her facial expression and frown are as if some absolute atrocity has been committed. When she says "I wish you every happiness" that tone and half-smile(/half-frown) with teeth seem so artificial it's like she's holding back what she really wants to say.

In my opinion Christina had every right to be upset and also feel like it was a strong workplace violation, and her comments to Hillary, I thought, were also meant to be funny to the viewer for their bluntness (they were funny to me): "It's not that I can't stand you, Hillary, even though I can't, it's just you and I have a different way of seeing things" and "Take out anything that could subsequently remind me of you including that bizarre 'kinetic sculpture' thing you have such a fascination for." And you have to admit, that so-called "sculpture" we saw earlier on was pretty dang random and weird.








reply

Yeah, I thought the same thing. Hilary was respectful, wished the two her congratulations, and wasn't overtly racist. Christina overreacted by firing her.

reply

There was nothing respectful about Hilary's actions or words. Christina most likely knew that Hilary was a bigot, but it had never flopped over in to their personal lives. This time her behavior was personal, and could no longer be tolerated.

Christina acknowledged Hilary's contributions to the job, and compensated her for that. But she wouldn't work with her anymore.

Hilary went out of her way to snoop and make not so subtle comments about the situation. Imagine how she would have behaved in the future.

reply

I think the point that was trying to be made by this character was that racism comes in many forms. Most obviously is the most overt and harmful form down in the South of Jim Crow, which had been on everyone's mind in the preceding decade as the Civil Rights Movement played out. But perhaps the filmmakers (Kramer, the screenwriter, I don't know who) were trying to convey the point that racism was not confined to the South and that even in a supposedly liberal place like San Francisco, you would find less overt, but still quite odious racism, a very hypocritical form (and the South was never hypocritical about its racism). So Hillary's attitudes are quite restrained, but entirely obvious nonetheless.

I grew up in San Francisco in the 60's and 70's, but my father came from Hawaii (moving to SF for college). My father recounts that once in the 1960's his cousin from Hawaii (who was part Hawaiian, so somewhat dark, especially with a suntan) came for a visit, and my father brought him along to one of the big athletic clubs in SF (I'll omit which one). Another older member pulled my father aside and with evident surprise and consternation asked him why he had brought a "black" to the club.

reply

I think, in addition to what has already been said here, is that sometimes a character, whether in real life or a work of fiction, is faced with a decision that they have to make, encountering a foil (a character who takes the opposite stance) is often used to solidify their previously wavering commitment to their decision. Initially when Christina met John she was shocked, and hesitant, but then hearing her daughter talked about how much she loved him, she knew what was right but only beginning to convince herself. When she saw Hillary's fake and insincere congratulations she realize that wasn't her, and in order for her to fully commit to her decision to sincerely back her daughter's marriage, she had to prove her commitment to herself - and sometimes the only way to prove your commitment is to do something permanent, like firing Hillary.

reply