MovieChat Forums > Dont Look Back (1968) Discussion > Which is better? Dont Look Back / No Dir...

Which is better? Dont Look Back / No Direction Home


Just wondering different peoples opinions so that I can decide which one to get. Maybe both someday... DYLAN IS GOD!

reply

They are both entirely different films. No Direction home just happens to use footage from Don't Look Back. I get different things from the two, but both are amazing. Get Don't Look Back if you want the myth of Dylan. Get No Direction Home if you want the man.

reply

if you don't know much about dylan's early career, the get no direction home.
if you know of his story well, then get don't look back.

both are outstanding, but i prefer don't look back, personally. however, if you don't know much about him, he comes off as harsh, rude, and just mean spirited.

reply

For me the better film is without a doubt Dont Look Back, but Dylan comes off a bit acidic. His character is portrayed better in No Direction Home.

Get Don't Look Back for behind the scenes Dylan during the concert tour.
Get No Direction Home for a better look at what and who Dylan was (in the time period).

Considering the whole package: Don't Look Back is a film. No Direction Home is a collection of glimpses and snippets.

reply

all true....it's not an either or...no direction home does include extraordinary colour fotage of the next uk tour...the electric second half from which came the "albert hall/free trade hall really" bootleg.

now that would be great to see in as full a version as possible

reply

both are great, but if I had to choose, I'd go for No Direction Home- it's more epic, plus it's Scorsese. But you can't go wrong with Don't Look Back as a pure time capsule of Dylan on the precipice of his folk-to-rock days (and it actually works *better* in hindsight of No Direction Home, if that makes sense, that he's not so much rude and prick-like but just sort of in a loop of media hype and buzz).



www.zackandmichael. com - No small roles, only small actors.

reply

Don't Look Back is the better of the two by far.
No Direction Home is garbage actually. It's way too calculated. It was actually insulting.
Don't Look Back is just the straight dope.

reply

"Don't Look Back is the better of the two by far. No Direction Home is garbage actually. It's way too calculated. It was actually insulting. Don't Look Back is just the straight dope."

I agree with this. Dylan in 1965 is much more interesting than Dylan in 2005. The guy interviewing him in No Direction Home did a horrible job. It ruins the film in fact.

reply

The formats of the two films are completely different, so in some ways it's difficult to compare them. While I've enjoyed NDH very much for the great footage it collects in one place, Don't Look Back is by far my favorite; it is I guess what would be called a "pure" documentary in that it is all footage with no narration and no on-camera interviews like in NDH. And the footage is just genius and needs no further adornment:

Highlights include but are not limited to:

- Dylan bawling out a drunken reveler in his hotel room
- Dylan bawling out an interviewer from "Time" magazine
- Dylan mind-screwing a self-proclaimed "science student"
- Dylan being congratulated by the high-sheriff's lady and her sons
- Dylan inviting an adorable Scouse fan up to his hotel room and humoring her
- Baez playing a lovely version of "Percy's Song" in Dylan's hotel room
- Grossman playing hardball on Dylan's TV appearances in a local promoter's office
- Dylan song-dueling with Donovan in his hotel room

(Speaking of Donovan, that's the one aspect of the film that always makes me squirm... because the two artists never should have been compared to each other and I think that Donovan gets a real bum portrayal... in their "dueling songs" scene it's such an unfair fight: Donovan plays the sweet but lyrically uninspired "To Sing For You" that is in no way representative of his talent, and Dylan totally delivers a knock-out punch with It's All Over Now, Baby Blue, which, it goes without saying, is the bomb. I'm a fan of both guys, so I always have a problem with the match-up. Still, it makes for great film so I'm not complaining too much...)

reply

"Speaking of Donovan, that's the one aspect of the film that always makes me squirm"

People should really stop considering that a song-dueling scene or competition between the two. You can clearly hear Donovan ask for "Baby Blue," so it wasn't like Dylan was doing his best to put Donovan down like so many have drawn the conclusion to all these years, he was just answering a song request.

She whispered in my ear "He's a half-breed," and I said "Fine, but can he paint like Van Gogh?"

reply

bobby cormier 2 different animals entirely. couldn't BE more different in their approach.

reply

You get more for the money with the new "Dont Look Back" delux set imho. I love NDH but there's a lot of influences and such with no Bob content that kinda gets in the way...but is relevant to his story.

reply

Meh, they're not really comparable, you SHOULD have them both. Don't Look Back is an experience, it's a trip, it's a moment captured in time, it's a movie. No Direction Home is very much a documentary. Sprawling, epic, in depth. I'd say you could get plenty from watching them in either order.

___
http://tinyurl.com/av95tqt

reply

[deleted]

They're both essential viewing.

reply