An unusual antiwar film


The first thing that struck me as I viewed this movie was the similarity in tone (it is filmed in black and white) to fifties/sixties television. The subject matter is another thing. We watch different groups range over the countryside killing each other. That's it. As the movie progresses- if you want to call it a progression- we go from one group to another. The hunter becomes the hunted. No one is safe. Death is like a tidal wave sweeping over the landscape. There is no sense to it, and thus the idiocy of war is flung up in our faces. Romance and family and politics and allegiance mean nothing in this film. The participants in this conflict are sucked into it and annihilated.

This is not a bloody film. The camera doesn't dwell on the murders being committed. It notes them and moves on.

reply

Yeah I agree. Also, neither side really seemed to be developed as the protagonist or antagonist - everyone seemed equally capable of wrong doing and pretty much everyone involved was guilty.

___________________
Myspace classic cinema group:
http://groups.myspace.com/cinema101

reply

Sad stuff for sure.


"Did you make coffee...? Make it!"--Cheyenne.

reply

If this weren't so boring it would be funny. I can just hear the director's instructions: There's no script, so--
If you can't think of anything to do, fire your rifle.
If you can't think of anything to do, take off your shirt.
Now everybody walk this way.
Now everybody walk that way.
You on the horses, gallop that way.
Everybody in white shirts, into the river.
Everybody in no shirts, out of the water.
If you hear a shot, fall down.
You, now separate the Reds from the Whites.

On and on for 92 minutes. Gesummaria!

reply