MovieChat Forums > Cool Hand Luke (1967) Discussion > Heavy-handed Christ metaphor

Heavy-handed Christ metaphor


They even had him laid out in a cross shape at one point. It would have been better if they hadn't laid it on so thick.

reply

In 1967 Christ metaphors were not so tired and cliched in movies as they are today. Audiences weren't looking for them, and the filmmakers likely felt they needed the symbolism to be fairly transparent.

reply

Most films in the 50’s and 60’s USA had heavy religious treatment in my opinion. They really seemed to drill it home because a majority of the country was very Protestant and writers felt like they had to include Christianity so that they wouldn’t be accused of NOT being Christian.

reply

Yeah, I enjoyed the movie, but I groaned here.

reply

I love this film but that’s the same reaction I had with an eye roll. He was hardly a Christ figure, but they wanted to make him Some kind of sacrificial figure, I hated it and it would have been so much better if they had eluded to that like a piece of art would do rather than slapping a Christian stamp on it.

reply

It was not about putting a Christian stamp on anything, but about using the most easily recognizable symbol that could've been used to imply that Luke was a "martyr." The film also could've used depictions of Saint Sebastian, but those images were not as well known. Even if they were recognizable, the problem is that they were also homoerotic, which would've given the movie the wrong vibe.

The movie could've also alluded to the shooting of Lee Harvey Oswald, but the movie The Chase already had done it.

reply

THAT IS RIDICULOUS.

reply

Bullshit. One scene is why you draw this conclusion. Your interpretation is incorrect.

reply

Try watching it again. Why would they have laid him out like that if they weren't going for that metaphor? They did it by accident? Of course, they were trying to undercut the gospels, in that he became a mythic figure, one that his "disciples" spoke of after his *ahem* departure in awed tones, bigger than life -- and with all the accuracy of fishermen talking about the little fish they caught which grew in size with each retelling. It plants a none-too-subtle seed in the mind of the viewer. "Yeah, I suppose it could have happened something like that."

You're probably under the mistaken impression that because it had Christ-like parallels that it was pro-Christian. Far from it. The vast majority of movies, even in the '30's, disparaged faith. Before you argue reflexively, what is guaranteed whenever you see a layman who carries a Bible and quotes from it? He's nuts or evil. Guaranteed. It's happens so often it's an overworked trope. This denigration is just a bit more subtle, and with no Bible verses. But for it to work, you DO have to notice the parallels, so they're heavy-handed. People were more biblically literate back then, is all.

reply

I only remember the one specific shot...as he was laying on the table after eating all the eggs, and it was as if Newman had to "work hard" and scrunch his body and stretch his arms and legs up in all the right places to achieve the desired effect. It was SO on the nose that I almost took it as a bit of a JOKE on the Christ role for Luke.

The other(equally?) important figure conjured in Cool Hand Luke is Sisyphus of "The Myth of Sisyphus"(try saying that 10 times fast.) Sisyphus famously had to keep pushing the same big rock up the same hill and do it all over again when the rock rolled back down. Like all of Luke's escape attempts, over and over and over.

In 2022, there is an HBO documentary series about Paul Newman (and wife Joanne Woodward) and somebody suggests that as much as Sisyphus's travails up and down the hill are a grueling grind..."maybe Sisyphus had FUN doing that over and over again."

Maybe.

reply

Maybe he was laid out that way to resemble Gestas or Dismas.

reply

IT IS NOT HEAVY HANDED.

reply