1945 Version - the best?


I think the 1945 version - And Then There Were None - had to be the best? Yes?

reply

Yes, but there are parts of the others that I prefer. Orson Welles' voiceover as Mr. Owen in the 1970s version, for example, is a lot more chilling than whoever does it in the original.

reply

For a straight-up adaptation of Christie's novel, "Desyat Negrityat" is impossible to beat. It plays it totally straight, while a few members of the cast, at first glance, seem odd (Alexander Kaidanofsky is not a ladykiller, nevertheless, he's an even better Lombard than anyone else who's played the role, and he gets to play him as the @sshole Christie wrote, and Blore is not played by an overweight actor, but the man who plays him, as well as the rest of the cast are fantastic) And it retains the downer ending.

Of the English-language versions, the '45 version is the best, but as Jimmy-128 said, I like all the versions for different reasons (the '74 version's cast, with Attenborough, Reed, Lom, Frobe, and Celi, and the music, Pleasance and Lom in the '89 version, though Lom could have played the Doctor again at least.)



I love to love my Lisa.

reply

The Russian one is a little TOO faithful to be perfect. It seems like the screenwriter simply lifted the book whole and entire and didn't put too much of themselves into it. And when they did change things, it was often for the worse. One example is Marston's confession, which he refers to as "beastly bad luck." When the judge (in the book) replies, "For them, or for you?", Marston is taken aback, and then answers, "Well...I was thinking for me, but you're right, it was jolly bad luck on them."

That last line is omitted in Desyat, and it bothers me; it's the whole point to Marston's character. He isn't like Lombard or Rogers, who knowingly choose to do wrong. He simply *does*, and thinks about it afterwards, if at all. It's the reason Mr. Owen chooses to kill him first.

Also, it's a minor point, but it wasn't until halfway through the movie that I was able to tell the actors playing Lombard and Blore apart. They're very similar-looking men.

reply

I like the 1945 version better also. The '45 version plays out like a mystery, and the music supports the story. In this version, as one reviewer stated, it is reflective of the era more than the murder mystery. I think the reviewers said "hip". All the components of the story are there, but the suspense is off-key.

My Bees! No Lisa, your Bees died days ago. Theses are their angry, mutant descendants, Homer

reply

Lot's of insightful replies - thanks everybody!

reply

To me the 45 version is the best with 65 an honorably distant second that has levels of enjoyment that the latter versions IMO do not have at all. One thing that helps the 65 version is that it's chiefly retaining the Dudley Nichols script from the 45 original though it removes the elements of black humor that the original to let the suspense play out more straightforwardly.

Casting wise the 45 is the best for a great ensemble but I admit I'm not a fan of June Duprez and find Shirley Eaton better (and sexier). Barry Fitzgerald is terrific in the original but Wilfrid Hyde-White IMO is outstanding in that he manages to surpass Fitzgerald for the confession sequence. Fitgerald remains the charming lepracahan through it all but Hyde-White injects a level of quiet insanity that you really see a deranged killer in him that Fitzgerald didn't communicate.

reply

Yes. I've just seen the 1965 version, in which I could find no merit whatsoever, and I didn't think much of the one on British TV last Christmas either. So I'll be re-watching the 1945 version again to wash the taste out of my mouth.

reply

I have not seen "Desyat Negrityat", but of all the others, the 1945 version is my favorite, hands down. This one was cringe-worthy in parts. No such issues with the '45 film.

I'll have to track down the Russian version. Sounds intriguing.

reply