MovieChat Forums > Seconds (1966) Discussion > Why did the people "boo" it at Cannes ba...

Why did the people "boo" it at Cannes back when it was released there?


I thought the French liked complex thrillers.

"Don't go down to the lake! I'm warnin' ya."

reply

I kinda liked this movie but I don't get the THRILLER tag at all. It was more of an arthouse mellow science-fiction tale with a whole lot of exposition.

All Movie Reviews www.cultfilmfreaks.com

reply

This article doesn't give a clear answer to your question, but it has some interesting comments by Frankenheimer:
http://articles.latimes.com/1997-05-05/entertainment/ca-55593_1_john-frankenheimer

Personally, I would classify the film as a psychological drama rather than a thriller.


---
Fowler's knots? Did you say ... fowler's knots?

reply

France is the Philadelphia of Europe--they just like booing stuff. But they do also give protracted ovations to the films that they like. They've got strong opinions...

Here's what some guy on Letterboxd thinks:

Makes pretty clear why it was booed at Cannes, as all those French intellectuals who were turning away from “bourgeoisie life” were probably not expecting a film that basically slaps their lifestyle in their face.


https://letterboxd.com/labuzamovies/film/seconds/

reply

Well....honestly....i was a little disappointed too. I didn't hear about this film till today and i picked it up after i read good things about it. But after i saw it....it didn't left anything behind. Somehow i had the feeling that the climax - his identity crisis as Wilson - wasn't masterated too well. Too superficial and not so well-played. But again....this is only my feeling

You don't have to be good all the time.....only when it matters

reply

The French and other similar huge groups of people have all kinds of opinions.

If it was booed by some it means that those people for various reasons didn't like the movie. Nothing wrong with that.

reply