Stephen Boyd is unbelievable in the role of a handsome, magnetic star
who can afford to treat women as shabbily as he does. He's haggard looking,
his accent is shaky, and he has all the personality of a piece of wood in this
movie.
Exactly. While we look at this movie 50 some odd years later, sure, the role could have been played by a handsome young'en. But the fact that a BULLY personality like Steven Boyd to play it was genius. It is campy but Stephen was believable as a hard headed oaf that had a mommy complex and treated women like dirt and his friends like a carpet. Back then, Redford would not have been as believable as such as cold-hearted snake. Boyd was a rough, bad boy, hard cold hearted snake. Redford...well, actually, he would have been a nice Hymie. Think abut it. Tony Bennett was too--yuch--to play that role. Boyd needed a softie to play against him to make it work. A young softie like a Redford back then who WOULD have married the Jill St. John character because he had such a softer heart, but could also be a flunkie to Boyd's character's harshness.
What was wrong was Eleanor Parker playing the "older" woman. Perhaps, she was TOO young to play that role, not that Boyd was too old. They needed someone like a made-up Ethel Merman or such, but in looking at the film, they relied too heavily on Vaseline to smear on the camera lens when ANY lead woman in that film had a close up.
Okay, I'll admit it: I need Edith Head!
reply
share