I remind you that if there were no remakes we wouldn't have had TITANIC, Gladiator, Alien or 300. To say nothing of Passion of the Christ, Pearl Harbor, Casino Royale and scores of other worthy films.
I will admit I could have done without the remake of House of Wax (itself a remake of Mystery of the Wax Museum), My Bloody Valentine, Halloween, Planet of the Apes, The Mummy, The Hills Have Eyes (actually didn't need the original on that one, either), and pretty much anything that started life as a horror film.
Remakes tend to suck because film makers tend to "update" them too much in a ,isguided attempt to make them TOO modern. If, for example, they made a remake of Gone With The Wind, it would be ridiculous if, in attempting to "clean up" the dated stereotypes of Mammy and Prissy they were to have Mammy say something like "Oh no you didn't!"
A remake of this film would succeed if the producer and director both agreed to follow the original script (issued as a photo-illustrated paperback at the time of the film's release) and NOT to make George Lucas's fatal mistake of throwing CGI and special effects into every scene.
The majesty of the words are carried by the simplicity of the themes. The complexity of the narrative is contrasted by the singularity of the moral center. Embellishing the source to make it hip, young and urban would be fatal.
"If you don't know the answer -change the question."
reply
share