MovieChat Forums > That Girl Discussion > This was not the first show about an ind...

This was not the first show about an independent woman


I love "That Girl". It is an adorable show for it's time and place. However, I get a little annoyed about how
groundbreaking it was. There were some shows in the 1950's about single women that are never mentioned. They aren't shown anymore--I'm even surprised TVLand will show "That Girl"--it seems that anything made before 1980 is too old to show anymore except for a few shows.
Anyway, does anyone remember Ann Sothern and her shows--"Private Secretary" and "The Ann Sothern Show"? or Eve Arden in "Our Miss Brooks"? Those were the real groundbreakers.

reply

[deleted]

Nick at Nite showed the Ann Sothern shows around 1985-87. As I remember, in one show she was the assistant manager of a hotel in NY and the other, obviously, a secretary. While these women wanted male companionship--they were okay on their own and not willing to settle for just anyone.
The Eve Arden show has very very rarely been seen and she did have a crush on the biology teacher, but she was bright and witty and strong.

reply

I have seen those shows Thanks to Nick at Night and TV Land...

That Girl is groundbreaking because those two shows still had women in traditional roles: One was a Secreatary and the other was a Teacher if I am not mistaken.

Ann Marie was the first young, pretty, single liberated gal who lived on her own to become an actress in a major city. That's what was so groundbreaking.

It took her boyfriend five years to propose to her - and she had a boyfriend to whom everyone knew she wqas sleeping iwth (wink wink) very liberated for this was the 60's.

She had a 50's kinda dad who thought his little girl would be around the home forever, but she said "no" to daddy and went to (gasp) New York City. Very liberated.

It was the age of free love, the pill, feamle independence, and the character of Ann Marie was the first noticable female on tv (1966) that did this in a non-traditional female role.

Now if you want to talk another non-traditional ground breaking strong female tv role -- you want to go to "Honey West", which was before "That Girl". The difference is "Honey West" didn't run as long as "That Girl" but Honey set the stage for female dectives and secret agents while "That Girl" set the stage for independent, single working females.


Just because you can talk, does not mean you are intelligent - Star Wars

reply

"It was the age of free love, the pill, feamle independence, and the character of Ann Marie was the first noticable female on tv (1966) that did this in a non-traditional female role."

I have to laugh. The sixties are the gift that keep on giving.

In a bad way.

reply

Honey West! Exactly....and before that, "Decoy" with Beverly Garland. Gritty.

reply

The others have got it right on the mark; a schoolteacher or a secretary were stereotypical roles for women at those times.

We could even examine the setups of the shows. I've not seen Ann Sothern's show, but Eve Arden's was a teacher looking for a husband and contending with a boss.

"That Girl" was about "That Girl". There was no adversary, no sidekick (no, Donald wasn't a sidekick, he was That Girl's intended).

Ann didn't report to a boss, like Lucy Carmichael or Doris Martin did.

Ann Marie had her own dream. Essentially, she was Lucy McGillicuddy sans Ricky Ricardo.

But the show was set up focusin on That Girll.

if we watch an episode and Ted Bessell or Ann's parents don't appear, then the show isn't different from others. It is still . . . . . That Girl!

da-DAH, da-DAH, da-DAH, da-dah, . . . . . . . .

reply

First of all, most people do have a boss, and can still be considered independent. Whether or not Ann had a boss is irrelevent to her being independent.

What is relevant is that Ann was something of an airhead, and Dawnnnnnn-ald and her father were always bailing her out of jams. The father apparently subsidized her rent, since she couldn't hold a job. That's not independence.

This show was not groundbreaking in the least.

reply

In one of the shows mentioned earlier, the woman was an assistant manager of a big NY hotel. Not a typical "female" job.
What is the biggest difference here is that Ann is very young! Ann Sothern was not.
I am amazed by some of these shows though--there's a mouse in the apartment and she calls her boyfriend at 2:30 in the AM!
Her jobs aren't exactly the kind you want to be doing forever either (meter maid, concession stand, salesgirl). I know these are the jobs she took while looking for acting jobs, but it didn't look like she was making much progress. Still, it is a very cute show.

reply

sjbradford: "First of all, . . . . "
-------------------------------------------------

First of all, I sorely dislike posts that feel the need to begin with 'first of all.' Just a peeve of mine, but I find it completely unnecessary.

Secondly, you have to decide which one we are going to discuss, most people having bosses, or characters in television shows up to this time and what their roles in life were dictated to be.

The roles of women up to that time, WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SHOW, were wives and girlfriends, get married, submissive roles.

Even those shows in which the woman was the star, such as Eve Arden or Lucille Ball, her relation was to others around her.

Lucy Ricardo was definitely the stronger, more determined character around, but her hindrance was her husband (as far as she was concerned, and not her lack of talent). This just means Lucy was a bit more complex than Ann Marie.

Ann Marie and That Girl were simply going to be a woman on her own who sought no assistance from others, usually men, and likewise she wouldn't be hindered by bosses or directors in her quest for stardom.

She would still have to struggle (granted moreso than Marlo Thomas probably did with her nepotism), but unlike Samantha Stephens as a wife, Jeannie's desire to marry Major Tony Nelson, there was no hint or message in That Girl that "As soon as Ann Marie got this nonsense of being an actress out of her system, she could settle down and marry Donald Hollinger like a good little wife."

And unless you can pinpoint an episode where Lou Marie gave his daughter money for rent, that assumption is unfounded. Marlo Thomas produced the show with the sole intention of making Ann Marie that independent figure, and it is highly unlikely she would have her character receiving allowances from her father on any kind of regular basis, if at all.

Substance-wise, the show is flaky. I just watched an episode in the marathon where Ann lost her ring while making a cake for a commercial ad.

Compare this to Lucy Ricardo thinking her ring was lost in that barbecue grill. Ann Marie doesnt hold a candle to Lucy Ricardo, case closed.

reply

>>First of all, I sorely dislike posts that feel the need to begin with 'first of all.' Just a peeve of mine, but I find it completely unnecessary.<<

First of all, I sorely dislike posts that feel the need to criticize other people's writing styles. Just a peeve of mine but, I find it completely unnecessary and obnoxious.

>>Secondly, you have to decide which one we are going to discuss, most people having bosses, or characters in television shows up to this time and what their roles in life were dictated to be.<<

You brought up that Ann not having a boss is a reason she is independent. I dispute that.

>>And unless you can pinpoint an episode where Lou Marie gave his daughter money for rent, that assumption is unfounded.<<

Not at all - I assume she had to have some financial assistance. It would have been difficult for her to afford that apartment given her job situation. And considering how flaky she was, I could see her going to her daddy for money. Yes, it's an assumption, but not an unfounded one given the context of the show.

>>Lucy Ricardo was definitely the stronger, more determined character around, but her hindrance was her husband (as far as she was concerned, and not her lack of talent). This just means Lucy was a bit more complex than Ann Marie.<<

Comparing Ann to Lucy Ricardo in a debate about whether or not Ann was independent only underscores the weakness of your argument.

>>Ann Marie and That Girl were simply going to be a woman on her own who sought no assistance from others, usually men.<<

Completely ridiculous - she sought the assistance of her daddy and Donald all the time. Hell, the only reason Marlo Thomas got this star vehicle was because of her real-life daddy.






reply

sjbradford says: ".............................."
-------------

lol!

HAPPY HOLIDAYS, FELLA!

Kwanzaa, Ramadan, Chrismtas, Hannukah, take your pick and live it to the fullest!

reply

uh huh

RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

reply

>>This show was not groundbreaking in the least.

Heartily agreed. I was a young teen and I watched this show for one reason: THE CLOTHES. I thought Airhead Ann led a controlled, limited, and dependent life. My friends and I used to scoff at her fabulous wardrobe and her nifty apartment in Manhattan, all on the salary of a struggling actress. Oh, and the way Ann used to wake up in the morning in full makeup, including false eyelashes! And her wig!

Role model my foot. She was a Barbie doll.

Patty Duke on the other hand had tons more moxie!


~~~~~~~
Please put some dashes above your sig line so I won't think it's part of your dumb post.

reply

Yes, it was. While Ann Southern and Eve Arden were older, established women, That Girl was just starting out. There had never been a character like that.

This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

reply

I don't think that Ann's apartment was meant to show that she was being subsidized. Her place is the Hollywood Housing Effect at work. Most people in television live in places that are far too nice for their means. That Girl is far from the most blatant example; that might be Sex and the City. (A newspaper columnist in New York couldn't afford Carrie's apartment unless she inherited a rent controlled place. And then there are her shoes!) Norman Lear's shows, starting with All In The Family, are notable exceptions; he tried to bring things closer to reality. (Props to the original exception, The Honeymooners.) And then there are shows with characters who are rich enough that they actually COULD live in really nice places, like Dallas and Gossip Girl.

Partly it's because you need a big space with good sight lines to be able to film and not have things look horribly claustrophobic. Partly it's because it's just too depressing to watch the circumstances that would actually come with the lives of the characters.

reply

I totally agree with your comment about T.V. Land. I was surprised to see this "That Girl" marathon, too. Nike at Night used to be great for vintage T.V. and when that bit the dust T.V. Land seemed to fill the gap until a few years ago, when "Reality T.V." and "Greatest T.V. Lists of...." started infiltrating the airwaves.



"I told you a million times not to talk to me when I'm doing my lashes"!

reply

the character of helen crump from "the andy griffith show" comes to mind. she came along before this adorable--but flighty and screaching--ann marie. yes, know helen was "just" a schoolteacher. but she played a realistic, young career woman who balanced her personal and professional lives in the very open, non-private setting of a small town. (if you're from a small town, you can appreciate how difficult it could be to be a teacher in the same town in which you live, and be dating the town's leader.) she and dated andy several years before marrying him, so she wasn't just all about getting that ring. she was also a transplant to north carolina from the kansas city area, and she had a master's degree in journalism. additionally, helen wrote a children's book, which became the subject of one episode.

none of these things may seem at glamorous as being an actress (ann marie) or even being an assistant producer (MTM), but taken altogether, it does paint a realistic, role model-type character--the epitome of the independent woman. she had a career (teacher), she had hobby/talent outside her career (writing), she moved far away from home (kansas to NC), and she was single and independent for several years.



too bad there's a horrible helen crump backlash among the fans of the show. they all prefer ellie, the lady druggist, another example of a non-traditional role for a woman. that concept was far too progressive for mayberry during the first season. they ran her out of town, poor thing.

reply

Well said.



"I told you a million times not to talk to me when I'm doing my lashes"!

reply

Whether meant to or not, Helen Crump came across as an obnoxious, overly jealous bitch. Ellie at least showed that a woman could be independent, self-confident and pleasant (cf. Mary Richards) rather than mean and bitter (cf. Murphy Brown) or a neurotic bundle of nerves (cf. Ally McBeal).

Your explanation of Ellie's disappearance has me imagining a mob of Mayberrians riding her out of a town tarred and feathered on a rail LOL.

reply

Yeah, I seen every episode of Andy Griffith about a dozen times and never thought of Ellen Crump as a "bitch," she always came across as empathetic and concerned about those around her.

However, Mary Richards struck me as insecure and incapable of committing to anything.

reply

Jack_1515:"Yeah, I seen every episode of Andy Griffith about a dozen times and never thought of Ellen Crump as a "bitch," she always came across as empathetic and concerned about those around her."
----------------------------------------------------

Watch that spaghetti episode again. She is literally biting Andy's head off, telling him, "Goober told you dinner was such-n-such," without giving Andy an ever-lovin' chance to INFORM her Goober delivered no such message.

Hardly empathetic or concerned about anyone but her own self being embarrassed.

reply

I don't know if I'd consider "that girl" to be a representative of the independent woman. I remember seeing it as a kid, and all i can remember is how much she wined "Don-al-l-l-l-d", and ran to daddy when there was a problem.

Silent 3

reply

What a great discussion...very interesting observations. I esp. love richardfuller1 and sjbradford's comments...very enlightening and I agree with you both. You both would make great attorneys. lol
New to these boards, but love em and IMBD!!

reply

She didn't have to run to Daddy, he was always there delivering her laundry, which supports your point in a different way. But she was in fact living on her own and pursuing her own career; they just couldn't make her TOO independent back in the 60s. Like the decade itself, the show was a transition from the traditionalism of earlier decades to the (relatively) liberal lifestyle of those to come, with elements of both periods, so we shouldn't expect too much of it. Gloria Steinem considers Ann a pioneering example of the independent woman, and while I may not agree with her on much else, that's good enough for me.

reply

Hi:

I read your post and totally agree with it. Ann Sothern, not Lucille Ball, was the first SOLE female producer of a weekly television show. I invite you to read my review of the tv show, "Our Miss Brooks". By the way, Desi Arnaz wanted Eve Arden and Ann Sothern to originally star in "The Mothers-In-Law". He was set to star them but was, correctly, convinced that their comedy styles were too similar. That's when Kaye Ballard was chosen to counterbalance Eve Arden. It would've been interesting to have seen Eve Arden and Ann Sothern work together, though.

Tom

reply

Just a note about her rent. She lived in an old walkup apt. She was always having trouble making her rent. In one episode she mentions she needs $87.50 for her rent. That's typical of that type of apt in the mid to late 1960s - for either of the apts she had.

Ann always had jobs and usually got some type of acting job. Her agent discusses one acting job - a commercial or maybe it was as the mop on the children's show. It paid $50 for just a short job. So I imagine she was able to make ends meet with the combination.

I have the first and second season DVDs and I had a ball watching them. Nice memories of the era and the NYC in the 60s. During the commentaries by Marlo Thomas and Bill Persky they laugh about her clothes. They realized she could never afford those - almost every outfit had its own matching coat - but it was something they were willing to compromise on because everyone wanted to see the clothes. It was TV after all.

In one episode Ann looks up an old boyfriend and discovers he lives on 73rd Street and she says,"Just 5 blocks away from me." If it's the East Side then the address I remember they use would put it in the East River. And if it's the Upper West Side then it would be in the Hudson.

As for her dad dropping in, he would sometimes explain his city visits as business for his restaurant. That makes sense since his suppliers could have been in NYC.

As for me, this show was the first about a young woman who DIDN'T WANT MARRIAGE AS A GOAL. That was really the whole key. Maybe some people don't realize but for women of that era breaking away from that societal demand was earth shattering in many families. Geez, there's still incredible societal pressure for people to be married. It was much worse then. It doesn't mean she didn't want a boyfriend.

I read that Thomas and Bessell were planning a reunion for Ann and Donald for 20 or 25 years later when he died. If the show ended in 1971 then I guess it would have been 25 years later. The plan was that they never did marry and they meet again and fall in love. Awwwww. That would have been even sweeter than if they had married back then. I can envision that Ann had chance to go to California for some great job and Don had some great opportunity to go to Europe or Asia as bureau chief - Don not wanting to ruin her career or put her in a situation where she sacrificed her career for him never asks her to go with him or does something to make her break up - whatever. There had to be some reason why they lost touch and then reconnect many years later.

There you have it. I've outlined the reunion show. I wonder if they would consider it with someone besides Ted Bessell. I know it might be a sacrilege but it might be doable if they could find someone as sweet and masculine as Donald to replace him. They just need to get the voice right cause he's going to look different anyway. I'd like to see this. Get on that right away, Ms. Thomas.

reply

Granted, she's not the star of the show and Matt has to be called in to deal with the rougher cowpokes. But she goes from a "wounded flower" of a bar gril in the early episodes to a formidable businesswoman running the most successful enterprise in Dodge City within a few years. that's more than Ann Marie ever did.

As to Ann's rent and clothes. I think it would have made sense for Lew Marie to be the owner of a chain of restuarants and fairly well off who agrees to let his daughter persue her career so long as he can make sure she lives and dresses in style until she can pay for it herself. Unfortunately they skipped over that and presented us with an inexplicable situation:: Ann has a nice apartment and great clothes even though she struggles to find work. No wonder Daddy is suspicious as to what she's really up to.



The past is a series of presents. The present is living history we are privileged to witness

reply

Clearly her father must have been paying her rent. (I wouldn't be at all surprised if in real life Danny Thomas was paying Marlo Thomas' bills as well) In various episodes, we see that he has a key to her place that he doesn't hesitiate to use to let himself in.

Was this series groundbreaking? I say no and yes. No it wasn't the first show about a single careerwoman nor did it show one who was truly independent like MTM, but it did go a bit further than those 50s comedies that were mentioned above. Call it a link in the evolution of women on TV (although honestly, I think that Marlo Thomas and the shows producers looking back have taken themselves a bit too seriously in congratulating themselves on being groundbreaking)

reply

Besides Miss Kitty, there was also Lois Lane of "The Adventures of Superman", and "Annie Oakley" starring Gail Davis.

reply

>>No wonder Daddy is suspicious as to what she's really up to.

lol


~~~~~~~
Please put some dashes above your sig line so I won't think it's part of your dumb post.

reply

I wish I could see Eve Arden in "Our Miss Brooks." I've always liked her. I also wish we could see "Life with Elizabeth," which is what I think the Betty White sitcom was called. Someone needs to dig some of those old shows out and air them. Also, I hear The Goldbergs was a good show. I know it's on DVD, but people say the sound quality isn't good, so I'm reluctant to buy it.

Okay, back to the topic. TV seems to be slower than movies at embracing new concepts. There were movies in the 1940s where women were strong, powerful, and independent. Movies with women like Rosalind Russell. They would play women who were authors or owned or ran big businesses. But then in the 1950s we had Ricky Ricardo giving Lucy a spanking when she "misbehaved." Yikes.

Maybe it's just that during the 1940s they wanted women to be strong, to help the war effort (working factory jobs, etc), and then in the 1950s they wanted to put women back "in their place." Or maybe I'm just overthinking this.

reply

No, you're not over-thinking the last point, in fact, you're quite right.

The show that really showed a woman working on her own, and not needing a man was this series: Decoy (October 14, 1957 to July 7, 1958, in syndication) starring Beverly Garland as an undercover police woman. Unlike all of those other series, this one was serious (of course) since it was about a police woman fighting crime. This show was heads and tails above shows like I Married Joan, I Love Lucy, Private Secretary,That Girland it was the one that started off shows like Police Woman and everything else on the air with women in it who are not housewives these days.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decoy_(TV_series)

reply

I think you all are forgetting about a certain show called "Hazel."



"Careful, man! There's a beverage, here."

reply