MovieChat Forums > Star Trek (1966) Discussion > What makes a "good" actor?

What makes a "good" actor?


The obvious answer is that good actors give convincing performances -- you believe they are whom they're playing. My favorite male actors are Max von Sydow and Robert Duvall. Among women, I guess I'd pick Meryl Streep.

But there are other aspects of being a "good" actor. Perhaps the most-important is placing the quality of the film or TV episode above one's desire for attention or special treatment. In this regard, William Shatner is a poor actor.

Bette Davis is another example of a poor actor. Though she remains one of the great screen stars, * she's notorious for her resentment for lesser actors (Joan Crawford being the obvious example).

But she also treated Errol Flynn quite badly. In Elizabeth and Essex, Flynn has a difficult role, having to convey three somewhat conflicting emotional states at the same time. Davis publicly criticized him, then retracted her criticism.

Had I been Ms Davis, I would have said to Flynn "Errol, this is a difficult role for any actor. Let's work together to get the best-possible performance."

* She had the good sense not to turn down TV roles. I saw her recently in a Wagon Train I remember from childhood, playing a woman who thinks she's pregnant, but is dying from a uterine tumor. Her unaffected and gracious performance pretty much tramples everyone else's.

reply

I still think that The Shat's acting in Strek III was great. It seemed he really threw himself into the part. One could pick up some genuine concern for Spock in different parts of that movie. And after David was killed. I saw no overacting there. Actually, everyone on the bridge at that moment seemed genuine. Looked like Scotty was on the verge of tears.

reply

Usually someone who is good enough for the public to plunk down the price of a movie ticket to go out to see. 💰

Luke Skywalker, your Mom was hawt! Darth Vader

reply

A good actor I think is one who knows how to act without letting the size of his balls (essentially ego) interfere with his brains, so to speak. Jimmy Stewart, for example, was a master at that sort of thing.

reply

But she also treated Errol Flynn quite badly. In Elizabeth and Essex, Flynn has a difficult role, having to convey three somewhat conflicting emotional states at the same time. Davis publicly criticized him, then retracted her criticism.


The successful Broadway play was seen as a vehicle for Miss Davis, who wanted Laurence Olivier to play Essex (Lunt and Fontanne had starred on stage.) Flynn demanded a title change (the play had been called Elizabeth the Queen) and his notoriously casual attitude toward acting not only made her role more difficult, it made it unlikely that he would work with her as you suggest. She worked to perfect her accent; he drank and caroused.

It was an extremely difficult role, to be sure. It would have flustered many an actor better than Mr Flynn. I'm rather fond of the supporting cast, though.

reply

What makes a good actor? Lessons in good acting.

Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!

reply

From this laymans' perpective, I only need to see a convincing performance, but I realize that can be highly subjective. In the case of a running character, like in a TV show, I can be forgiving of a temporary straying from the norm if an otherwise acceptable performance is pretty convincing.

For the most part I can divorce myself from the on-set antics or personal life foibles of an actor. I just don't care that much because it's almost always 3rd party accounts and subject to a lot of heresay and he said/she saids. Some actors rub me the wrong way and I know nothing about them. For instance, I think Leo DiCaprio is one of the worst actors ever, yet he is wildly popular and tremendously prolific. (he almost changed my mind with The Revenant - kudos for that performance).

Good writing can make or break an actor. So much of a good performance starts with a great script that it can't be ignored. A truly great actor can elevate a mediocre script for sure, but a competent actor can shine with a great script and a great actor with a great script is gold.

reply

But there are other aspects of being a "good" actor. Perhaps the most-important is placing the quality of the film or TV episode above one's desire for attention or special treatment. In this regard, William Shatner is a poor actor


Are you referring to his being a camera hog or something else?

reply

That, and worrying about how many lines he had. Even if someone is a "star", they should be concerned with the contributions of the other performers.

reply