Just watched it for the second time the other night. I'm the guy that said it was a hoot, but on second viewing I have to give them an "A" for effort (but an "F" for execution). It was someone's vision of the future, and no one can see the future. The furniture and architecture was all mid-century modern...but recall that back then, we didn't CALL it "mid-century modern," we just called it "modern," because we thought that that's what the future looked like. Well, in a sense we were right...but we had no idea it would survive as a campy retro look. Back then, we thought, this is as good as it gets! As to the effects, I think we learned a LOT from the making of this movie...like, what NOT to do. Very simply, don't make low-budget sci-fi/vision of the future films. But someone had to make the mistake in order for us to learn from it! That's about the best defense I can muster.
Seriously, though, I love that they tried. They tried to capture on film our collective dreams of a utopian future. And for that reason, the film is somehow...endearing.
==JJS==
reply
share