Why is this movie in B+W?


Financial or Artistic?

reply

I would say primarily artistic; it's used to convey the gritty, earthy, downbeat world of Burton's character (in contrast to the technicolor, glossy James Bond spy films of that time). Personally, I think it works wonderfully; I honestly can't imagine THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD working in color.

reply

[deleted]

Think about the subject matter. Agents move in a shadow world, and the blacks, whites, and shades of gray represent this perfectly. An absolutely perfect story to film in b&w. Arguments can be made for color or b&w on many films, but this is one where I believe the case is closed.

reply

This was also nearing the end of an era for B&W films. At that time, there were separate oscars for Color and B&W: Cinematography, Art Direction, Costumes.
The next year, 1966 was the last year of separate awards. Every director wants to make a black and white film. I think every director should.

reply

Think about the subject matter. Agents move in a shadow world, and the blacks, whites, and shades of gray represent this perfectly. An absolutely perfect story to film in b&w. - norm_gillespie

That's exactly what I thought the first time I saw Spy: Although it may seem that the motivations and "good guys" and "bad guys" are apparent--in black and white--the reality of those definitions and the moral ambiguity inherent in their deployment become a spectrum of varying shades of gray.

------------------
"Build high for happiness." - Red Kangs. Red Kangs are the best Kangs.

reply

I would say primarily artistic; it's used to convey the gritty, earthy, downbeat world of Burton's character (in contrast to the technicolor, glossy James Bond spy films of that time). Personally, I think it works wonderfully; I honestly can't imagine THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD working in color. - terrythomas

It may be significant to note that the British 1960s spy series Danger Man (later known in the United States as Secret Agent), which I consider to be the most realistic spy series of the decade, was filmed in black and white except for its last two episodes. Patrick McGoohan, the star of Danger Man, would have made a good Alec Leamas. He may not have had the brooding angst and dour resignation that Richard Burton conveyed, but McGoohan would have been able to convey the clenched-jaw resolve and enigmatic coldness.

The black and white format suited Danger Man to a tee in the same way that B&W worked for Spy: Things that may seem to be black and white in appearance actually blend into shades of gray, or that may hide in shadow until exposed in the light. Tellingly, perhaps, the two Danger Man episodes shot in color, the last two, have a cartoonish feel to them that belied the intelligence and sophistication that distinguished the series almost to the end, although by that time McGoohan was prepping for his next series, The Prisoner; the final episode, "Shinda Shima," was ultimately a pallid James Bond imitation; coincidentally, McGoohan had been tapped to play James Bond before the role was offered to Sean Connery; he refused, of course.

------------------
"Build high for happiness." - Red Kangs. Red Kangs are the best Kangs.

reply

Movies about "East Germany" "Spies" even films depicting "London" are so, so much more effective in B/W-
Color would have thoroughly ruined the eerie effect one needs to enhance this movie.
The only film characteristic I would have changed, would have been the court room decor.
This looked like a hunter's lodge, with elk and reindeer antlers all about-
And posters of NATO/OTAN uniforms?
Oh, they could have had black and white photos of unknown burly, Communist Officials, or Erich Honecker and Kosygin and Brezhnev instead!

reply

Firstly it is explicitly stated in the film that it isn't a trial but a tribuneral and it is secret. It would be more likely then to take place in somewhere other than a public courthouse.

Clearly the set is intended to be of a room not originally intended for the purpose. Judging by the coat hooks around the walls, the film projector screen rolled up behind the members of the tribuneral and the recognition charts of NATO uniforms on the wall, I'd suggest a room in a former hunting lodge which has been taken over by the secret service or the military and used as a classroom for training purposes.

reply

I totally agree. Just one of the many reasons I love this movie.

reply

It was the preference of many film-makers in the 1960s to shoot serious, low-key subjects in b/w. (and many still would, given the choice)
The costs of shooting in colour were slightly higher but it was a trivial difference for a film with a reasonable budget. Many films with a far lower budget than The Spy Who Came in From The Cold were shot in colour.

reply

I was just discussing this very question with my wife as we watched this on dvd yesterday.
As I told her, it may be called "black and white", but as you view it, there are very few things that truly are black or white. Nearly everything is a shade of grey...just like the gritty "real world" of espionage inhabitted by the characters in the film.

reply

Orson Welles called black and white "the actor's friend".

reply

As probably already noted, the more serious movies around that time often did tend to be in B & W. Generally it seems - looking at my film list - that in the mid-1960`s the stage was pretty evenly split between color movies and B & W (for instance, from 1965 I`ve got 19 movies and 10 of them are in B & W; from 1966 22 movies and also 10 of them B & W. Change was quick, however - from 1969, I`ve got stashed away 24 pictures, only 3 of which are not in color).



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

As well as artistic -- and b&w works very well in this case -- there had to be overwhelming financial considerations. It was no competition for the James Bond series worldwide, obviously, as has been said elsewhere on this site. Also, it would have been a waste of time distributing the film almost anywhere west or east of the Rockies judging by a lot of the comments here along the lines of: "Ah don't get it. Why were the Britishers speakin' all British, and wah didn't they just head 'em off at the pass?"

reply

This film in this era with this subject matter .... in color?

I think not!

--

The most profound of sin is tragedy unremembered.

reply

In the DVD extra, Le Carre says that the director wanted it that way because he wanted to make an art film. Interestingly, Le Carre himself thought the decision was a perversity and probably not a good idea.

reply

Financial or artistic?

Even if the decision starts out as financial, it becomes artistic because once black-and-white is decided on, lighting, set design colors, costumes, makeup, film stock, lenses, filters, and other variables are all based on it, and different from what they would be if they were filming in color. That being said, the very grim subject matter and emotional tone of this movie made black-and-white a perfect choice.

reply