MovieChat Forums > Repulsion (1965) Discussion > Photograph at the end...

Photograph at the end...



Good lord that freaked me out... Don't know why really... Perhaps the look on her face. It honestly gave me chills... Anybody else?



Formula of my happiness: a Yes, a No, a straight line, a goal. ~ Nietzsche

reply

I thought it was to show that she had always been a disturbed person. In the case of the child molestation theory (from the other posts), this would point out that it had happened at a very young age and the damaging effect is visible early on.

reply

[deleted]

Maybe she was just angry that she had to have her photo taken, thus the old stare down. Lord knows what is going on in such a person's mind.

reply

I thought it was scary, too.

The photo underscores she was out of it years before.

reply

The photo was terrifying especially since from far away she looked peaceful and serene and in the zoom in you could see her giving her crazy eye.

reply

[deleted]

If you look real closely the first time the picture is shown (I don't recall exactly when but it was very early on in the film) you can tell that she wasn't "peaceful and serene." I had to rewind it real quickly b/c I wondered as it cut to the next scene exactly why Polanski had decided to zoom up to a shot on the mantel of a family photo when nothing really had happened yet (though we get vibes from the very begining that something is "not quite right" with Carol). What you see there is an obvious foreshadowing to the final scene where Polanski makes it quite obvious. In that very first time you see the family photo in the film it seem inocous...until you pause it for a second on the zoom to take a look. Everyone is smiling except for a young Carol who is in the background. At the time I thought it was just to show that she was mentally unstable even before she became a young adult. The final zoom-in at the end, though, does offer maybe a bit more to the underlying glare/stare and unsmiling face other than just pure instability. (I think it is obviously meant that she was sexually abused as a child just based upon her odd behavior around the men that were in her life).

reply

Really scary scene. That look on Catherine`s face was soooooo unnerving.

Brilliant.

reply

Truly was an amazing film, and as you say her portrayal was deffinaly unnerving.

"Thank God I'm an atheist"
Bow down to Bunuel
Borderline obsessive

reply

that friggin picture was terrifying. black and white horror films and the grainy quaility of the films of that era bring more mood and atmosphere than any horror *beep* in todays cinema.

reply

I agree. I also think that today's horror films seem to be more 'slasher' types. Whereas I always found a psychological one to be a lot scarier. I count Repulsion as one of the latter, as, like the photo at the end, it is what it inferred, and what carole dreams (like the rape) that makes it so scary.

"Thank God I'm an atheist"
Bow down to Bunuel
Borderline obsessive

reply

True. It corresponds nicely to the title sequence as well, showing the hurt along with the insanity at an older age... The build up to the look in the photograph was terrific and the music was right.

reply

epic crazy eye, indeed.



Key to winning baseball games? Pitching, fundamentals, and three run homers.-Earl Weaver

reply

how do you know that was her father or that her father was the cause of anything?

_____________________________
Pan and Scan makes me dizzy
Letterbox forever!

reply

I believe it is implied that her father molested her as a child and that is why she behaves the ways she does as an adult. It was clearly a family photograph and the little girl was giving the father that stare. I will never forget that final shot.

reply

Creepy that Polanski would make a film about a woman ruined by childhood sexual molestation... and then go ahead and molest a child himself.

reply

Because her "fantasies/delusions" at night when the man in the shadows rapes her. It is like she is a child going to bed at night and her daddy comes into the room. Did you notice also how the first "raping" she hated it... later on she ended up enjoying it.

It is clearly implied that she was molested by her father.

reply

Now, I'm not a psychiatrist, but there are some subtle signs that lead me to believe that she was indeed molested by her father.

As many above me have already noticed, she had this absent and a bit repulsive look in her eyes on that family photo, meaning that whatever "haunts" her, it could be traced back to her childhood.

One can notice her strong connection to her older sister. She is obviously frighten by the idea that she is going on vacation and leaving her alone. Here's what I think: her father molested her only when her sister was not there - so, whenever Helen was with her, Carol would be safe. And now, being all alone, Carol's worst nightmares come to life again.

Various male hands that we see (like the ones in the hall in one of her fantasies) prove that she is affraid of a male touch and contact.

Now, there is one more thing that caught my eye. If you pay attention, quite a few times in the movie, Carol scratches her arms, and rubbs her nose. My two cents about it (Psychiatry 101 :) ): she feels dirty, and therefore she subconsciously tries to clean herself.

Ergo, I have no doubts: Carol was indeed molested by her father.

reply

Geez... your interpretation of her molestation having happened when her sister was away from home when she was a young girl, and in present, not feeling safe and secure because the sister left, subsequently causing all her repressed rape fantasies/nightmare to come flooding back into her head/life...yeah...I never really even thought about that. Pretty great observation there. And it makes perfect sense in the "father molested her" interpretation."Everything begins and ends at exactly the right time and place."-from Picnic at Hanging Rock

reply

Vey very good point..
As we all see Carol never shares even with the closest person she has (her sister) what is hapenning to her life, mind e.t.c And her sister acts like there's nothing wrong with Carol "She's just sensitive, that's all!"..
Carol was abused as a child when her sister was not present and she never talked to anybody. Same story as an adult.

"I can resist everything except temptation!" O.W

reply

good point.

reply

this whole thing with the picture is way overrated

my vote history: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=4847523&s=reverse_uservote

reply

how can an underrated film have something that is overrated? in your group of real life friends or the ten people on this specific board?

reply

What you said does not make any sense!

The word "over-rated" sure is over-used on these boards. I wonder if you kids know what it actually means.

reply

I kept expecting the head to move and murder me. Then I realized later on that

1. Polanski would never go for such a cheap scare.
2. It was scarier with the icy glare.
3. They wouldn't have the technology back then to create that effect convincingly.

REPULSION is definatly the scariest movie of all-time.

Leatherface, you bitch! Look what you did to my Sonny Bono wig!

reply

I was thinking that too... I just thought the eyes would shift very slightly. That would have been FREAKY!

But you are also right about Polanski not doing something so cheap.

Good stuff.

reply

Yes, I too found it to be incredbily poignant and deeply disturbing. That look on her face truly gave me the chills...

reply

oh god that 's so wierd! i thought the exact same thing that she would turn around and look at us.

i also thought that they wouldn't have been able to do that back then.

Walk into a guy's house, start looking through his sh*t, you'll find things that embarrass him.

reply

no way, it would have been ridiculous if he made her move. it was perfect just how it was.
and of course i agree with the point about her being sexually abused as a child.
What an amazing movie.

reply

Although it's possible. The thing that's odd in the photo is simply that she's the only one not looking at the camera. She's looking away, kind of spacey. Yes, it shows that she's always been disturbed, but I'm not sure there's any reason to suppose this is a result of abuse. Maybe so, maybe not. The nature of madness is that you can't just explain it cause and effect - it makes not sense to those who don't share it. I find it annoying when people try to box it up neatly and say "Oh, she's just nuts because someone raped her." There's no reason to believe she wasn't simply haunted by her repulsions and delusions since childhood.


"I can only express puzzlement bordering on alarm."

reply

I agree 100% with the above post. The film would never be so reductive as to say that abuse must be the reason for her disturbance.

reply

the rape fantasies do seem to point that direction.

reply

I have to agree with those who say that the film points to molestation by the father. Clearly, from what the landlord says, it is a family photo, which means mother, father, sister and Carol. Then, in the last shot, because of the shadows, you really only see the father and Carol with her menacing stare directed right at him. To me it seems clear that the final shot, which those posting here found so impactful, is indicating the "why" that was so obviously missing throughout the beginning of the film - why such a beautiful young woman whose sister has a healthy appetite for sex would be so "repulsed" and terrified by men.

reply

I agree. The whole film is perfectly constructed to lead up to that final shot of her staring at that man with the terrified look. We dont know for sure if thats her father but I dont think it matters, that guy did something to her and everything points to sexual abuse.

If that photograph moved it would have ruined the film, made it into a comedy so anyone seriously thinking it should have please leave this board. heh ><

reply

I think people are very wrong to believe that she has been abused, causing her to be "different". She doesn't have a rape fantasy; she has nightmares about being raped, which is entirely different. I know because some of my worst nightmares are the intruder/rape type, and I've never been harmed in any way. She simply became more fixated on this and had to deal with hearing her sister and her lover together, which would be unnerving and upsetting to her. Also, he taints her surroundings~not just the brush in the glass, which he obviously does to upset her.

While not every celibate person becomes completely unhinged as she does, the world can seem much more threatening I think.

When I first saw this, I understood the pressures she had to deal with at work and in social settings that she was incapable of dealing with. For some people, a date can be an ordeal, depending on the person and his expectations.

I never viewed her as a rape victim. I don't believe she was ever sexually abused. The photo tells us a lot by her being apart from her family with what I see as a somewhat lost, introspective, lost to the world gaze; she is in her own world at that point. I've always tended to be that way, and I did not like physical contact. I still do not. I've learned that this can be from a number of causes~ADHD and fibromyalgia/CFIDS included; often, an ADHD person finds physical touch uncomfortable~too harsh, too heavy, too irritating. She is very beautiful, and, if she still is a virgin, knows what men usually expect, setting up a fear response. Think about when she finally snaps, the circumstances that send her over the edge. Autism is a possibility, too.

There are so many other reasons for her behavior, and I don't believe molestation is one.

~~MystMoonstruck~~

"I will take you places you have never been, and I will show you things you have never seen.~~And I shall see the life run out of you."~~Ghost Story

reply

I agree that the childhood abuse angle is left ambiguous (at best), but I don't agree that her rape fantasies were actually nightmares.

What I got from those scenes was that, like any human being, Carole felt strong sexual desires. However, she was so repulsed by them (i.e. look what it does to people) that rape was the only "acceptable" means to satisfy those longings. Hence, the violent sex fantasies.

reply

I don't know of any woman who fantasizes about a rape, not with what we know about the psychology of the act. So, a girl fearful of sex, even if she has "urges", is not going to fantasize about such a violent sexual encounter. I disagree strongly about this being a fantasy she wants.

This is her nightmare. This is her greatest fear, which is why she kills the landlord, which undoubtedly sends her over the edge. If she fantasizes about it, why does the real thing cause her to commit a murder?

People like to think that a girl like Carole feels "strong sexual desires" when she very likely does not. Try being an innocent in a world that expects something more. It can range from uncomfortable to terrifying. For Carole, this becomes repulsion at physical contact. Intruder nightmares are NOT an enjoyable experience! Watch the film "Salvage", in which those nightmares are placed on film. (Thank goodness for the ending!)

~~MystMoonstruck~~

"Smith's right. I AM a museum piece."~~Boris Karloff in "Targets" (1968)



reply

I don't know, I think I agree with prodigylover on the subject of whether or not those scenes were nightmare or fantasy. It's a horrible thing that terrified her, but during one of the last of these scenes she puts on lip gloss immediately before going to bed, then lies there wide awake. She almost seems excited about it. To me that said it all. I could have misinterpreted that though. Any thoughts?

reply

I tend to agree with you and the other poster about the rape scenes. In the first rape nightmare/hallucination/fantasy, she is terrified by the sex and struggling to get away. In the second rape, she is still terrified but seems to struggle a bit less. In the third rape, she puts on lipstick BEFORE she knows what is going to happen, and lays there with a smile on her face waiting. When the actual act does happen, she seems to alternate between being terrified and actually enjoying it.

I also agree that it's obvious that she's struggling with a repulsion of sex and a strong sexual attraction to men during the movie. This is obvious in the scene where she picks up her sister's boyfriend's shirt to put it in the hamper- or maybe it was even the trash can. She picks it up with two fingers, holding it far away from her, about to throw it away, then, almost as if she can't help herself, holds it to her nose and breathes in deeply, smelling it. After she smells it, she immediately gets sick and vomits. It's a very strong scene.

And to say that NO women have rape fantasies is simply untrue. There are women who fantasize about being tied up during sex, dominated during sex, being forced to have sex, hit during sex, etc. Obviously that's not all or even the majority of women, but they exist. There's such a social stigma about it that women who enjoy such sex live almost a double life. Unfortunately, some women like that kind of sex because they WERE abused, but there are some women who are just into it. There are people who are into everything.


"The only thing I expect out of lawyers is that they be back in their coffins by sunup."

reply

[deleted]

It is very interesting what's been said in this thread about her father being the cause. I don't think we can say that for sure, but it's a pretty good theory.
Another interesting point: at some moments of the film, Michael and Carol's sister seem to behave like her parents. They say goodbye to her right before they leave in such a "parents way". They send a postcard, Michael says "behave! don't do La Dolce Vita now that we are away from you". And finally, at the end of the movie, some people consider the possibility that she is raped by Michael (I think you can say either she dreams that it's happening or fantasizes). We can't tell also if that actually happens, but it's quite interesting, if you consider that Michael has "played the role" of her father.


"he went a little funny in the head... you know, a little... funny!" (Dr. Strangelove)

reply

"There's no reason to believe she wasn't simply haunted by her repulsions and delusions since childhood."

That's what I've always thought (though you put it better than I could have). I think the "her father raped her so now she's homicidally crazy" explanation is just too pat. It seems to me more likely that she was always unnaturally, unwholesomely attracted or attached to her father for reasons that had everything to do with her own mental processes and nothing to do with his.

We tend to think of forbidden desire as equivalent to a wild romantic longing, naughty but ultimately harmless. But I imagine for those burdened with it, it's a curse. I'll never forget that prison interview with Jeffrey Dahmer when he said, "The urges never really go away". Scary stuff.

reply