MovieChat Forums > Monster a Go-Go (1965) Discussion > Its really not so bad....

Its really not so bad....

posted 14 years ago by UndergroundG
4 replies | jump to latest

Sure acting sucked and movie was poor but it is a 60's B movie what do you expect. The plot lifts this movie out of the bottom 100 itself you didnt see the end coming and I havent seen an ending like that anywhere else I've seen many movies worse, with worse acting, worse directing and horrible stories that you knew how they'd end.

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] MattyBAnderson 14 years ago

This movie is a piece of garbage. It hardly even qualifies as a movie. There was no plot, just like there "was no monster". Definitely deserves to be in the Bottom 100, if not lower.

[–] FlyingSaucersAreReal 10 years ago

It's barely a movie. They just threw together some unused footage from a couple of different films, and dumped it in drive in theaters.

I am the eggman, they are the eggmen
I am the walrus, googoo goo joob goo goo goo goo joob-J Lennon

[–] WakenPayne 10 years ago

you didnt see the end coming and I havent seen an ending like that anywhere else

Yeah but if the monster turned into a snowman of Bruce Campbell and started dancing to "The Dying Swan" - you can say nobody saw that coming. Although that would've made it more interesting then "No monster". Well it is your opinion but if a movie has a twist at the end I really don't like the "Everything you've watched up to this point was complete bull *beep*

it is a 60's B movie what do you expect

I have seen many 60's B-Movies and some of them even beforehand. Unless the only other movie you've seen from the era is either Manos or The Creeping Terror then this is NOT the usual standard of these movies.

I've seen many movies worse, with worse acting, worse directing and horrible stories that you knew how they'd end.

Horrible stories? What story?

If you've seen worse movies then can you please tell me about them - just so I can tell what to avoid.

The acting I agree SOMEWHAT with. The acting is some of the worst I've seen but not the very worst, I'd say Tommy Wiseau alone is worse of an actor then all the people in this movie combined.

The directing part has me scratching my head though - Didn't both directors of this movie call it crap (even Bill Rebane - The director who's other movies are the calibre of The Giant Spider Invasion - called it the worst movie ever made)

You have your opinions I have mine.