MovieChat Forums > The Hill (1965) Discussion > Connery's Finest Hour

Connery's Finest Hour


Yes he may be the best Bond (personally I prefer Lazenby but I always say it was David Niven just to be controversial) but 'The Hill' is by far Connery's finest acting performance.

What is equally remarkable is the timing of this film - coming just after Goldfinger. At a time when other actors would go out of their way to play it safe Connery chose to play a powerful, complex character - minus hairpiece.

A brave decision at the time has left us with a brilliant , but sadly neglected , performance.

If his films last for a thousand years this will surely be regarded as his finest hour !

reply

Yup. Doesn't matter he makes all kind of crappy movies, he can act like the best of them. At least, he could... :)

In a mad world only the mad are sane.
Akira Kurosawa

reply

I totally agree... this is an virtually ignored masterpiece. I challenge anyone to find a better performance from Connery (even his oscar winning performance for The Untouchables doesn't come close). His other great performances are for The Offence and The Molly Maguires... two other criminally ignored films. When is Connery going to give us another great performance instead of wasting his talent and time on films like The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, The Avengers or Entrapment??

They call me MISTER Jinx

reply

This is one of my all-time favourites (I wonder if it will ever be released on DVD?) - it only ever gets shown in the wee hours of the morning here in the UK - mostly because of the use of the N-word.

I would have loved to have seen this on the stage as it was originally written, but I doubt if it would ever be done these days!

Incidently, I used to have a desktop theme for "The Hill" on my old (Win98) computer - must find it and put it on this machine! It had some good sounds and pictures... I'd love to have a sound file of the inmates singing "Kiss Me Goodnight Sergeant-Major!"

> When is Connery going to give us another great performance instead of
> wasting his talent and time on films like The League of Extraordinary
> Gentlemen, The Avengers or Entrapment??

When people stop offering him lots of money for such easy box-office hits...

I agree that he is a great actor in this film - partly because of the emotional and hard-hitting subject matter.

reply

At Connery's age I'd hope he's made enough money and could concentrate on the art of acting which he's proved to be so good at in the past.Connery hasn't made any risky moves in his career lately... and yet he's made lots of crappy films. I wish he could watch The Hill again or The Man Who Would Be King and remember what it was all about!

Anyway with so many little-known classics coming out on DVD I wouldn't be surpirsed if The Hill should be released sooner or later... I'm sure it would find a good following and would sell well thanks to Connery's crowd pulling name and also to a lesser extent, Lumet's good reputation as a director! A dream would be to have a commentary and some interviews with the surviving cast and crew...

They call me MISTER Jinx

reply

[deleted]

I've just tried to find this film on DVD but obviously to no avail! Yes, it is criminal that this work of art is not out on DVD but sadly reflects a low level of conciousness in the western world on the political nature of cinema. It also reflects a general desire on behalf of the cinema going audience to escape from reality a little too much perhaps! Escaping is , of course, a very desirable thing but modern, popular cinema, i.e Hollywood etc, escapes to far off places that make little or no sense and reflect not only an alternative reality but a distorted vesion of life. The history of the west in America is the supreme example of how cinema informs the way in which people see the past. The historical inacuracies, coupled with the "happy ending" Hollywood presents us with nearly every time, contrasts sharply when we look at the factual evidence regarding the real history of the west! It certainly was not an Injun killin/good guy, bad guy/hero gets his girl situation every time! No siree!! Life was tough and not always triumphant, people struggled against tremendous odds and did not always succeed! Life for the native people was devestating (10,000,000 indians died due to famine, disease and ethnic cleansing) but this stuff is not worthy of attention. Of course it is uncomfortable viewing for a public that has been brain washed into thinking that Calamity Jane and Roy Rogers is a true representation of how things were in the west.

The hill, on the other hand tells us that authority is very powerfull, that it cannot be defeated by the individual alone. Authority is not just buildings and uniforms and jails and routine, but a deep seated social/psycological state that infects everyone and that if you challenge it on your own you will get your head bitten off! It is the kind of film the people in charge do not want you to see because it begs the question......If we cant do it on our own then how do we realy get rid of these *beep*!!! TOGETHER PERHAPS????? THATS REVOLUTION!!!!

reply

[deleted]

I also agree that this is one of Connery's best performances, but another great piece of work he's done that hasn't been mentioned yet is his Robin Hood in ROBIN AND MARIAN with Audrey Hepburn. I'm not saying it tops his work in THE HILL, but the humorous side of his Robin is an extra attraction.

As for the talk about Oscars, it's a regular occurance that actors win the award as much for previous performances as for the specific role cited. So I'll always feel that a little bit of Joe Roberts went into the trophy Connery finally won.

reply

As for the talk about Oscars, it's a regular occurance that actors win the award as much for previous performances as for the specific role cited. So I'll always feel that a little bit of Joe Roberts went into the trophy Connery finally won.

Have you ever read the 1993 book "Alternate Oscars," by Danny Peary? He actually thinks Connery should've won an Oscar for this movie too.


http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0385303327/qid=1116086554/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-4607888-5334267?v=glance&s=books




reply


This film & The Offence, even more, are, IMO, Connery's best performances--both directed by Lumet. In The Offence, he leads us inside a very disturbed mind.


Carpe Noctem!

reply

Gotta agree with MrJinx...THE HILL and THE OFFENCE are the best movies Connery ever made and both deserve to be much wider known and recognized for the great movies they are!

...now I do it just to watch their f----n' expression change.

reply

How about Ian Hendry's finest hour too?

I was fortunate to interview Hendry just months before his death in 1984. He had a pile of "Hill" stories to tell, along with anecdotes about Theatre of Blood, Get Carter, Live Now Pay Later, and his casting contest with Michael Caine for the part of Lt Bromhead in Zulu, which of course he lost!:)

I've watched The Hill several times on TCM now, and I pick up something new everytime. A real British classic IMHO.

reply

Yes, a real British classic directed superbly by an American no less!

reply

This is probably Connery's greatest film but if you like The Hill you should also try The Offense.

reply

I think I might have saw some of this on TV but doesn't he also speak with his heavier scottish accent that he uses today instead of sounding like Bond?

reply

[deleted]

AnEnglishmanAbroad said:

"I was fortunate to interview Hendry just months before his death in 1984. He had a pile of "Hill" stories to tell, along with anecdotes about Theatre of Blood, Get Carter, Live Now Pay Later, and his casting contest with Michael Caine for the part of Lt Bromhead in Zulu, which of course he lost!:)"

Uhhhhmmmmm, care to share any of those anecdotes?

--
Karl Morton IV
[email protected]

reply

I still need to see several of Connery's movies, particularly The Offence and The Molly Maguires, but this is the performance I like best so far. He's much better in The Hill than his Oscar-winning performance in The Untouchables.

"Dry your eyes baby, it's out of character."

reply

Agreed-the oscar for Untouchables smacked of sentimentalism rather like John Wayne`s award for True Grit.

reply

[deleted]

And Newman's for The Color of Money.

reply

Easily Sean's best role/performance....I bet he's most proud of this one!....also, glad somebody else has mentioned good ol' Jack Watson.

reply

I read somewhere that Harry Andrews was second choice for the role - the producers wanted Trevor Howard. It's impossible to think of the role without Andrews playing it - easily his finest performance and he should have gotten at least an Oscar nomination - but Howard was a good actor when he exerted himself.

reply

The Offence,
The Hill,
The Name of the Rose

are for me Connery's finest films.

His performance in The Untouchables was admirable but shallow and coated in too much sentimentality.

I often feel actors like Connery produce their best for lesser/indie films than the big studios of Hollywood. Hollywood is where actors earn their big money, but the independent studios is where they produce their best work in my opinion.

reply

I think The Man Who Would Be King is his finest hour but The Hill is a close second.

reply

Greetings,

I recall reading somewhere (sorry, cannot confirm source) that Connery has always considered "The Hill" as his finest performance.


Sidney Lumet's actor-centric directing style perhaps?

bye,

s

reply

My favorite Connery movie/performance is The Man Who Would Be King.

reply

The more I see great films like Marine, The Hill and The Man Who Would Be King--and the more I see Connery turn out tremendously in all of them--the more I wonder if he just might be my favorite living actor.

"What I don't understand is how we're going to stay alive this winter."

reply

This and The Offence. For a Bond, he sure has ability.




"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

Sean Connery was in MARINE? Where in the world did you get that one from, Icebox?

Oh my God, I just got it...Did you mean MARNIE?

LOL.

reply

I have to say , that for me The Offence is Seans finest hour that was a tour de force , not that his performsance in this film is bad because it isnt , I have just finisehd watching and what struck me was the scene with Harry Andrews , when Connerys character is forced outside with a bad foot and their shouting at each other , the way Connery acted was brilliant in those 2 or 3 minutes , and it struck me that at the time cinema goers must have been quite shocked/impressed as up to that point all they had ever seen was bond .

1. The Offence
2. The Hill

Both Great films

reply

Connery's performance is good but he's totally outclassed by Harry Andrews who's mere presence on screen steals the show.
I've never seen a film that Andrews doesn't captivate when he's on screen.

reply


The Hill is just more than a great performance from Connery. I believe the entire ensemble deserves a standing ovation. After the first time viewing this film I was utterly shocked why this diamond of diamonds wasn't nommed for any oscars. This film is a masterpiece. Hands down.



I'm Your Huckleberry.

reply

He is in fact great in this movie. It's certainly his best non-Bond performance. And since I find those Bond movies pretty corny, The Hill may be his best performance I've seen so far, no matter how suave he is as James Bond.

reply

He was the only James Bond as far as I'm concerned but his two best performances were in Lumet films - THE OFFENCE and THE HILL.

reply