MovieChat Forums > Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! (1965) Discussion > If Quentin did 'remake' this movie...

If Quentin did 'remake' this movie...


it would turn out like Inglorious Basterds. Which is to say, it wouldn't really be a "remake," the "remake" would actually be an homage. And yes, I love Tarantino's homages.

reply

But he already did a 'homage' to this one with the awful "Death Proof". He should not touch this movie, no one should.

tHe MuRdER CaPiTaL oF thE woRLd

"walk into this world with you head up high"

reply

[deleted]

"But he already did a 'homage' to this one with the awful "Death Proof". He should not touch this movie, no one should."

Basically what I was about to answer.

Death proof was a bad joke, and if he lays his hands on Faster Pussycat - the horror, the horror...



"Are you serving that ape a Martini ?"

reply

Death Proof is also my favorite QT movie, he should definitely do a remake of FPKK

reply

You are correct. This movie would be impossible to remake. Not because it was perfect but because it encapsulates the 60's and we ain't there anymore.
The genius of the movie is that it takes all the things which made the 60's what they were and twisted them so nicely;
Speed - (I love the MGs, Porsche, Triumph, Jeep...),
Sex - contrary to what the plot synopsis says they were not strippers. They were go-go girls, like M&R's laugh-in.
Violence - as it was becoming so prevalent in the media due to the effects of WW2, Korea and upcoming Vietnam.
Combined with good old greed and, of course,
Huge tits for a generation raised on bottled formula for the first time.
To make the same statement now, I think, would be impossible. First, you would need a Hollywood outsider who had learned his or her art filming the horrors of war who had the genius to not just satirize the culture but twist it by placing those components into the hands of those least suspected.
Tea-party members as jihadists would be only the start. You would still need to address computer driven isolation (Social Networking). I have gone on long enough but you get the idea - it just would not be near as much fun. This movie makes me smile and appreciate living through the 60's



reply

Tarantino has yet to pay homage to anyone or anything.

HOMAGE
noun
1. respect or reverence paid or rendered:
"In his speech he paid homage to Washington and Jefferson."
2. something done or given in acknowledgment or consideration of the worth of another:
"a Festschrift presented as an homage to a great teacher."

THEFT
noun
1. the act of stealing; the wrongful taking and carrying away of the personal goods or property of another; larceny.


We've met before, haven't we?

reply

I'd have to agree with this, he always mentions his "inspiration" for each film he makes, but never mentions the TRUE film that he borrowed from. Like Hateful Eight, which borrowed so much from Cut Throat Nines and Great Silence, yet he never mentions those, and instead mentions The Thing and some Western TV show.

He gets away with it because most of his audience have never seen CTN or TGS.

~RANKING 2016 FILMS~
imdb.com/list/ls031254554
Last seen: Don't Breathe [7/10]

reply

Exactly. The vast majority of his audience is seeing these things for the first time, so they're not questioning whether he's creating something completely original.



We've met before, haven't we?

reply

Tarantino has yet to pay homage to anyone or anything.

HOMAGE
noun
1. respect or reverence paid or rendered:
"In his speech he paid homage to Washington and Jefferson."
2. something done or given in acknowledgment or consideration of the worth of another:
"a Festschrift presented as an homage to a great teacher."

THEFT
noun
1. the act of stealing; the wrongful taking and carrying away of the personal goods or property of another; larceny.


Exactly.

I find Tarantino to be an amazing storyteller - but NONE of his ideas are HIS. He filches everything he does - cheats, steals - none of it is respectfully borrowed.

What's ever worse, is his cult following around the world praises him for being original and unique and having his own personal touch. I guess he HAS developed that over the years, but it's really just making something somewhat sophisticated and drawn out - of something that was already great, not broken and didn't need to be fixed.

reply

I can't stand seeing film covers/posters/reviews that have nothing to do with him have a quote from someone saying, "Tarantino-esque" or any mention of him, like he's the end all be all of, well.... anything!
Entertaining, sure. New? Non Monsieur!

We've met before, haven't we?

reply

Yup. I feel the same.

reply

I'd have to agree with this, he always mentions his "inspiration" for each film he makes, but never mentions the TRUE film that he borrowed from. Like Hateful Eight, which borrowed so much from Cut Throat Nines and Great Silence, yet he never mentions those, and instead mentions The Thing and some Western TV show.

He gets away with it because most of his audience have never seen CTN or TGS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

100% YES! Thank you! You nailed it !!!!!!!!!!




"The ENEMY of my ENEMY is my FRIEND"

reply