Anyone like this?

haha. i just saw this movie tonight. i gotta say, i enjoyed it. one thing i can say in response to your criticisms/frustrations... it's a satire. i don't think it's meant to be taken seriously. this gives the director/cast/etc. a bit of license and leeway. things can be completely over the top and nonsensical (c'mon, a gun-bra?) and the plot doesn't necessarily have to follow any real path. another thing: why are americans in new york speaking italian? i don't think it really matters.

my take on the movie is that it's a funny, dystopic "vision of things to come." comedy is a good way to mask social commentary and make it more palatable for the masses. had they been trying to make a "serious" film, they might have kept the style and left out much of the camp. as for the boobs, well, ursula andress IS a mighty attractive woman, so i share your frustration on that one.

some things i liked about the film: the costumes were pretty badass, the sets and apartments (how the GF dials the phone and asks for five rooms' worth of neo-gothic furniture), the sunsetters, just all around good *beep* packed into this thing. i'm wondering what others thought about it as well. i haven't really been able to find too much info on it. just caught it at the AFI theater.

--take it easy--

The movie was awesome, take it as more of a "theatre of the absurd" than a thriller, kind of like the '60s Batman in some respects.

"No man is just a number"

I didn't like it, way too dated

When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

OMG!! I LOVED this film. It is a total spoof on about a zillion different genres. It is a total cheese-fest. This is a scream a second. They all must have had such a great time making this movie.

Ummm, as far as "why can't I see her boobs" uh yeah, anyway, for those who are not neanderthals ......

It is interesting that he still is her 10th victim in the end, though not in the way defined in the Big Hunt. I thought that was ironic too.

It's never "just a movie."

I just finished the movie and loved it. But I am an absolute sucker for 60's/70's movies which depict the future as a sort of dystopia (Logan's Run, Death Race 2000, Clockwork Orange, Rollerball, etc.). The movies create such wonderful constumes and sets but no matter they always look like they are taking place in the 70's; It's fantastic! And there was a certain feel which those movies created which our modern hyper-serious movies could never-reproduce. I would disagree with another poster who says this movie and others like it was a comedy. Nor do I think it was a satire really. I think the directors of the day were able to have more fun with their movies and thus they come off campy. But that is what makes the films great in my opinion. Beyond that I loved the plot. It is not only an intriguing depiction of how we may eventually reconcile our civility with out savagery but it also opens up a debate about whether or not what these people are doing is immoral or unethical. So my guess is you are just not a fan of this style of movie (unless it offers boobs as you mentioned). To each their own.

I thought this film was a great deal of campy'n'cheeky fun. Ursula Andress and Marcello Mastroianni made for extremely attractive and appealing leads. Bonus points for the colorful visuals and that infectiously bubbly'n'bouncy score. 8 out of 10 from me.

1,000 mini-bios and I feel like I'm just getting started

Not a big fan of "campy flicks" but this one was awesome! Can't expect less from Petri.

This is a bad movie with a killer crocodile in a swimming pool, a guy with a hook for a hand with a built-in cigarette lighter, a pop art house with Pompeii corpse statues and a herd of sheep in it, a cool Italian 60s soundtrack, Ursula Andress in a pink backless top and pants, and she kills a guy with guns hidden in her metallic bikini top!

How could anyone not like this movie?